Battle for Starting Running Back Brewing for the Arizona Cardinals
The Arizona Cardinals knew heading into this year's draft that Edgerrin James was closer to the end of his career than the beginning. They knew that they had to add another back to the stable and they preferred one with some game changing speed. They didn't get exactly what they wanted in April's draft but they did select a back who ran with authority and played faster than the stopwatch would suggest. Even though many so-called draft experts and fans had never heard of Tim Hightower, of tiny Richmond College, the coaching staff was ecstatic after the selection in the fifth round. They immediately started comparing him to Marion Barber and the praise for the rookie hasn't stopped since. He was impressive during camp, preseason and throughout the first seven games of the season. Everyone seems to be excited about what the rookie brings to offense, well almost everyone.
Complete breakdown and analysis after the jump......
There have always been questions about whether Edgerrin James was more concerned with his personal legacy than with his teams success, and the questions have gotten louder since he came to the desert. Last week reports started to surface that Edgerrin James wasn't so happy with his role, or to be more specific his lack of a role, in the offense:
"I don't want to just be on a team; I like to play," he said. "If I'm not playing, it's not serving a purpose. What purpose is it serving? I don't want to feel like I'm selfish but you want to play......Hey, I still got years in me, I know that. I can still play some ball. I ain't worried."
When you're 30 years old, averaging 3.5 yards per carry and there's a promising rookie breathing down your neck, those are the kind of quotes that you get sometimes. Edge didn't fair much better in his first game out of the bye though with just 17 yards on seven carries, a fumble and a drop on what looked like a well set-up screen. Hightower had a poor statistical game also (3 yards on 6 carries) but he had a couple of productive carries that resulted in a first down and a touchdown when it looked like he'd be dropped for a loss. That naturally led to Ken Whisenhunt being asked in a press conference, for the first time, if he would consider starting Tim Hightower over Edge. Whiz, who has always championed competition, didn't completely shoot down the idea saying:
"I think we have shown we will play the players we feel give us the best chance to win," Whisenhunt said. "We did that with the quarterback, we did that with the linebacker, we’ve done it with the offensive line. At the point we feel Tim gives us the best chance to win, then absolutely (he would start).
That doesn't mean that Hightower is slated to start this Sunday, but it's something to keep an eye on and certainly something that Edge will take personally. Whiz also said that they didn't want to give Hightower "too much" right now so it's unlikely that any major shift would be made in the near future. However the running back carries end up being split, one thing is painfully obvious, something needs to be done about the league's 29th ranked rushing attack.
While I think we all understand what Edge brings to a team and how he helps an offense in ways that don't necessarily show up in the boxscore, it's also obvious that he's not a franchise back anymore. Opposing defenses don't fear the running game or his ability to hurt them. Can Hightower strike fear into a defense? We honestly don't know at this point. I would argue though that if he received a majority of the carries, he would outperform Edge. They've both got great vision but Hightower has an explosive burst, that allows him to get through, a hole that Edge simply doesn't have anymore. I'm not sure that they can bench Edge but I do think they can make sure that Hightower receives at least half of the workload (and not just on the goal line or short yardage) Thoughts? Should Hightower start? Should they let Edge continue to start but give Hightower more carries?
0 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
OL headaches
We have have a decent O-line, it’s just they’ve become so good at pass protecting they cannot remember what to do on a run play. The opposing defenses are getting too much penetration on running plays and are fouling up running lanes and hitting the RBs behind/near the line scrimmage. For Edge, that’s doom. He takes one hit and immediately he starts to fall forward. For Timmy, he skips around a bit and gets a few more yards than Edge. Does that mean Timmy is the better back? On Sunday’s running TD, I’d say yes, but overall, I think Edge is still the guy IF the o-line can get some push and let Edge hit the holes cleanly and fall forward when the first hit comes four yards down field. IF the o-line cannot figure it out, then give Timmy the ball and let his young, bouncy legs find something but be prepared to temper the gains with a loss 20% of the time.
We all leave footprints in the sands of time, just watch out for the discarded fish hooks!
by Hawkwind on Oct 28, 2008 10:01 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Timmy
I was thinking the exact same thing. Edge is the ‘safer’ option because he’s never going to turn a one yard gain into a three yard loss by dancing, but at the same time he’s not ever going to that one yard gain into a 15 yard gain. With Hightower, that one yard gain could go either way. That two yard touchdown run never, never, never would have been made by Edge, but Timmy could have also been tackled for a four yard loss.
Since the passing game is so explosive, I think they can overcome some of the ‘minus’ plays that Hightower might produce. The occasion big run that he produces though will help the offense more than the 15 carries where Edge get’s a consistent two yards a carry.
by cgolden on Oct 28, 2008 10:40 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
O-line Pass protection is much improved
They have been giving Warner the time he needs. Kudos!
Hightower needs to get the ball more, end of story.
Every time I start thinking, “Why doesn’t JJ get more shots to prove himself?” says Matt to himself. He does something like…ohh, I don’t know, go out on a short passing route let Warner’s bullet slide right through his fingers and right into the defenders hands. So conflicted over this guy.
by badmatty53 on Oct 28, 2008 10:09 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
JJ
Yea that was a bad play and I think I read somewhere that JJ ran the wrong route. Supposedly that’s why Warner hesitated before the throw and could be why it sailed high. I think it had something to do with Warner changing the play at the LOS and the two of them not being on the same page.
by cgolden on Oct 28, 2008 10:47 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Miss communication or not
You have to catch that ball. Fitz, Q, Steve, all would have made that catch. Kind of fell bad for the guy, if he were given more opportunities I think he would produce. You can’t expect more play time when you don’t seize the opportunities that are presented.
by badmatty53 on Oct 28, 2008 10:56 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think that was very avoidable ...
Those plays happen in football and he’s shown way more positive than bad this season. We wouldn’t even be talking about that this much had the defense nut checked and stopped Carolina late in the fourth quarter setting up a game winning drive.
by boogatt66 on Oct 28, 2008 10:51 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
So many reasons we lost this game.
Seriously 3rd and like 17?
by badmatty53 on Oct 28, 2008 11:24 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
They happen...
But if your B-Rabbit, I mean JJ Arrington every opportunity is live or die.
by badmatty53 on Oct 28, 2008 11:26 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
So let me get this straight Hawk?
You want a flopper RB as to avoid having a higher % of losses for run downs. Hightower is a 1 cut type of guy. I have never seen him try to dance around minus the last game where there was absolutely no hole where he was running. I do believe that ended in a touchdown as well…
I am not impressed with the o-line either. They are 1 dimensional up to now. If we had the best run D# in the league and the worst pass D# we’d still be middle of the rung. You can’t be solid at one part of your job and suck at the other and become complacent!
by boogatt66 on Oct 28, 2008 10:44 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I want:
1) Consistent holes opened up by the o-line and four yard per rush; Edge is more reliable, still, at doing that.
2) A RB that will be good at picking up the rush; Edge is still better at that.
3) A RB that can take the dump off pass and go somewhere with it; both can do that.
So I give a slight edge to James. I love Timmy, don’t get me wrong, I just want him to be the change of pace that is positive when he’s in the game. If Timmy is our starter, what’s our change of pace? Someone not on the roster…yet.
We all leave footprints in the sands of time, just watch out for the discarded fish hooks!
by Hawkwind on Oct 28, 2008 12:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
change of place to Timmy?
JJ? — Ok, maybe I’ve had too much Kool-Aid.
by cgolden on Oct 28, 2008 12:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Blocking would have to VASTLY improve for JJ
Or we have to start replacing the opposing team’s Gatoraide with our bourbon-spiked Kool-aid…or we ask to play the Lions and Bengals the remainder of the season.
If JJ could pick up the blitz well, he’d be awesome on third downs. His chip blocks are…lacking, but he’s a blast to watch in space.
A second tight end that could block wouldn’t hurt either. ::cough, cough:: Or maybe Elton Brown gets a start at guard?
We all leave footprints in the sands of time, just watch out for the discarded fish hooks!
by Hawkwind on Oct 28, 2008 1:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stay with Edge
Im not convince Edge is done. Look what happened when he got the ball in Washington and San Fran? Good games. He hasnt got the ball a lot lately. Im very excited to see how hightower progresses though, once he starts getting the ball. I think we are just seeing a preview. This is a hard one, I think James needs the get on track at least for this year in order for us the have a good running game.
by Andrew602 on Oct 28, 2008 4:54 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
having second thoughts...
Why put a rookie in there to be slaughtered with a line that doesn’t block on the run? Edge’s career is almost over. Why not let him suffer through it until we get our line better suited for the run and pass. But then again, Timmy would probabbly fare much better with some of those tight holes that the line makes. He would benefit with extended play. Ay yay yay. I’m so confused.
by hevchv on Oct 29, 2008 5:21 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I think coaching is doing it right
Hightower is getting the time he needs in the right situations to get him up to speed and build his confidence.
by badmatty53 on Oct 29, 2008 10:51 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs

by 














