Whisenhunt to ESPN: Leinart is Still the Starter for the Arizona Cardinals
We expected Coach Whisenhunt to downplay the ESPN story that the Arizona Cardinals had named (or would soon name) Kurt Warner as the starting quarterback. It was a bit surprising that he went as far as to say that Leinart was still the starting quarterback for now and that no 'knee-jerk' reaction would be made after one half of preseason football.
"Contrary to everything (reported), nothing has changed," Whisenhunt said. "We have not made a decision. We have not named Kurt the starting quarterback….It’s unfortunate it was out there. Its unfortunate Matt has to see those things. But I understand the quarterback
is the focus and people are quick to make judgments. It’s a process. You don’t (make a decision) based on one play or one half….But it’d be incorrect of me to ignore the fact Matt didn’t play well."
Whisenhunt went on to say that he talked with Leinart and reiterated that the reports weren't true, especially the part about his arm strength and his inconsistent play in camp. He also mentioned that Leinart's mistakes were physical 'gaffes' instead of mental errors which points to the mistakes being easily correctable. Both quarterbacks took snaps with the first team in practice on Monday and at least for now we'll have to wait to get some confirmation on who will take the field on September 7th, when the Cardinals travel to San Francisco.
Is anyone buying Whiz's story or is this just posturing for the sake of keeping the Niners from being able to focus on one QB? Is there any way that a great game by Matt against the Broncos would sway someone's opinion at this point?
0 recs |
23 comments
|
Comments
Hey give the reigns to Warner and MAKE Leinart earn the job! We know Warner is very capable and can lead this team to at least 8 wins…Warner WILL get hurt at some point, then maybe Leinart can take things over and be THE GUY…I see no problem with going with Warner to start the season…
-Dave
http://www.eSellOut.com
Cardinals Tickets for the fan who is tired of paying outrageous prices to a scary scalper!
by esellout on Aug 26, 2008 9:14 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I truly hope...
he’s not telling the truth. That would be a stab in the back to Warner, who was told the best QB out of pre-season would start. I hope leinart doesn’t start, for the sake of our record, the mojo of the locker room, and for the sake of our receivers.
by boogatt66 on Aug 26, 2008 9:16 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
That’s my biggest concern as well. What does it say to Warner and every other guy in that locker room if Whiz start Matty? The old adage of “playing the best 11” wouldn’t really apply anymore.
by cgolden on Aug 26, 2008 9:31 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep, then they're going to have a Packers situation in Arizona...
and they really have not established the franchise (YET) like Greenbay has. This will throw all their progress over the last several years out the window.
by boogatt66 on Aug 26, 2008 9:53 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
It won't be the same thing...
….as GB. Leinart has started 16 regular season games to Rodgers 0. GB was banking on the future with an unproven product while Leinart has shown us what to expect with him.
I love the smell of commerce in the morning
by Red Reign on Aug 26, 2008 12:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Whisenhunt is serious and Leinart REALLY is the starter
That’s not good news for the team. Leinart hasn’t done squat. Although maybe they’ll do the dual QB thing like they did a bit last year. Still, Warner is much better as of now.
Visit FanIQ.com for sports news, bloggings, polls, and more!
by MrNFL on Aug 26, 2008 10:27 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Bluff
No worries folks, this is all damage control posturing to maintain the mystery of the starting QB going into the season. “Believe In Now” is the NFL’s slogan for this season and that’s what Whiz has been preaching all off-season. Nothing is different, as the best 11 will be starting in Week 1 on both sides of the ball. “We Do This Together”, right?
What Dave said applies to either QB that starts the season. Someone will get dinged and the other will come in and shine. From that perspective, I’d rather see Leinart starting now when the whole league is tied 0-0 rather than later in the year when our playoff hopes are riding on his “questionable arm strength and decision making”. Oi. We know Warner can bail out a sinking ship like none other (Rams ’99: Trent who?).
Still, I want to win now. I’d like to see a winning record at the end of September. So does Coach Whisenhunt. I’d like to rub a Cards victory in the noses of all the Niner fans here at the office. Don’t you? For that to happen, Warner needs the reins from the start and let’s just hope we have a QB that can go the whole season…when did that last happen? Neil Lomax in St. Louis? Plummer maybe once?
We all leave footprints in the sands of time, just watch out for the discarded fish hooks!
by Hawkwind on Aug 26, 2008 11:11 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
good question
I’ll have to try and find out the last time a Cardinal QB took every snap in a season or at least played all 16 games.
With a tough second half schedule, I think a strong start is critical to a playoff push down the stretch. With that being said, I want whichever QB gets us the Dallas game at 4-1 or better. From what I’ve seen through three preseason games, that’s Kurt Warner.
by cgolden on Aug 26, 2008 11:15 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You obviously missed...
what I was alluding to. I was talking about the best player playing, and the ramifications it would have towards the Cardinals locker room. If Leinart started over Warner, it would mean the best QB was not starting, which transfers over to other facets of the game. What would that mean to others players? There egos would start to run wild and they would be thinking they were benched because of politics and not sheer athletic talent. SLIPPERY SLOPE. That is why the Packers had to get rid of Favre because if he was benched to Rogers, the best man would not be starting! Understand my wordier comparison now?
by boogatt66 on Aug 26, 2008 1:10 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
The Wonderful Whiz of Az
would be insane to give the job to Leinart. Based on all of the facts available to even the layman who are not privy to the same info that he has it isn’t a competition any longer. For the sake of all thats feathery. Give the old man his job back!
What about the rest of the team and the detriment for all those brave men and woman (Bolden) out there fighting for all Americans and our right to waste an entire Sunday swilling beer and eating crap and watching our lawns grow wildly out of control. Its not right damnit, and I for one am not about to stand around and let some else make these decisions that so adversely effect the rest of us. Oh wait…yes I am. Guess I will have to wait and see what really happens.
by badmatty53 on Aug 26, 2008 1:54 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Why let the lawn grow wild?
Invest in a goat or teach the wife the nuances of the lawnmower. If you go the lawnmower route you have a great excuse to turn every TV on in the house to a game with the volume blaring, lock the doors, and feign ignorance that she was locked out of the house all day. Oh wait, who is going to bring you cold beer to swill? The goat will look great in your old Boldin or David Boston jersey and make satisfactory noises when you kick it in frustration every time Warner fumbles, Leinart passes INTs and beer bongs around the opposing DBs during and after the game, Fitzgerald delivers the loaf of bread as a fumble or Rackers misses wide left and blames his holder…again. Also when you run out of “crap” to eat, you’ve got a nice fat goat!
Indeed, we wait and hope the Cards can get out of the Broncos game in one piece and let the cuts happen and maybe by then Whiz will make a decision. I think our expectations will be met, otherwise we’ll all wash out our shorts from the shock and have a lot to vent about here at RotB. :P
We all leave footprints in the sands of time, just watch out for the discarded fish hooks!
by Hawkwind on Aug 26, 2008 3:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
REAL MEN OF GENIUS...
Thank you Mr. Badmatty53 guy….
by boogatt66 on Aug 26, 2008 2:08 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
just keeping it real...
ridiculous! After all you guys pretty much said it all and i felt left out.
by badmatty53 on Aug 26, 2008 2:35 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
were any of those interseptions even catchable?
just curious if some blame could be shifted to the receivers.
by hevchv on Aug 26, 2008 6:57 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
IMO
The first one is debatable because I think Whiz tried to shift some blame to Fitz but the second and third are all on Leinart. He was trying to loft the second one over a defender but instead he threw it right to him. On the third one he waited to long to pull the trigger and by the time got close, there were three Raider defenders and Boldin had no chance.
by cgolden on Aug 27, 2008 5:37 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
First pick was all Leinart
I thought Leinart should have targeted that first one between Fitz & the sideline. He threw it to the wrong side of the receiver which opened it up for the pick.
by AJ BirdWatcher on Aug 27, 2008 7:11 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, no, and no
“It’s more physical than it was mental” is about the lamest excuse I’ve heard yet. You “threw the ball to the wrong spot”…well, sure, you physcially tossed a duck down the field twice but your brain chose the spot….so it’s your weak arm that’s to blame? Then what about the scramble and toss to Urban, when a floating duck down the sideline where only URBAN could catch it would have been ideal…you tossed a bullet right to a ref-running-over-Raider. NICE! Leinart will be starting for the LA Avengers before Fitz’s contract is up since that’s where most of the Cards’ has-been QBs end up.
We all leave footprints in the sands of time, just watch out for the discarded fish hooks!
by Hawkwind on Aug 27, 2008 7:37 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
all in all this game was a good example of classic steelers football.
What do you think?
by hevchv on Aug 27, 2008 5:41 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
They definitely won the game with pounding the rock and a stout defense. That type of game is going away in today’s NFL but when it looks like it did on Saturday night, it’s a thing of beauty.
by cgolden on Aug 27, 2008 6:55 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm confused, did the Steelers invent run-control football?
Or do you mean “Terry Bradshaw threw a lot of of INTs and Franco and the O-line saved their asses”? In that case, I totally gotcha your back on that! ;)
It’s refreshing to see a little run-control football coming from a team with a mostly white helmet. It’s been…well, a long time. OJ Anderson? Million Dollar Backfield? Nevermind those aborted attempts with Emmitt “Lure Cowboy Fans Into Seats Regularly” Smith, Thomas Jones, Garrison Hearst, etc., etc. etc.
But alas…it was preseason. Just like Rackers’ 59-yard field goal last year, doing it in the preseason only helps your chances of making the 53-man roster; doing it in the regular season is a totally different thing. Most of that “classic” game we saw was with the youngsters in the stable, not the “old” (never thought I’d be calling someone 10 years younger “old”!!) reliable in James. If Edge can pull of some consistent 10+ yard runs and break at least one 20+ yarder against the Niners, Dolphins, Jets, and Redskins, then I think it’s permissible to paint one-half of the Cards’ helmet black with no logo in homage to the coaching staff’s predominate Steelers’ pedigree.
Talking about last times…when was the last time preseason was used as an excuse to tone-down a Cardinals positive rather than put on the blinders to another Cardinals blunder?
We all leave footprints in the sands of time, just watch out for the discarded fish hooks!
by Hawkwind on Aug 27, 2008 7:29 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 




















