Arizona Cardinals Defense Prepares for Ben Roethlisberger
It's not often that a defense faces a quarterback who is 6'5, 241, but that's what
Darnell Docket, Karlos Dansby, Adrian Wilson and company will be facing this Sunday. The Arizona Cardinals defense has been playing inspired football in the post season but they'll have another huge test this Sunday when they meet the Ben Roethlisberger-led Pittsburgh Steelers. The Steelers haven't been a prolific offense this season but Roethlisberger has a knack for keeping the game close and making just enough plays in the fourth quarter to pull out a victory. Five times this season he led drives late in the fourth quarter or overtime to take the lead or tie, including three scoring drives in the final two minutes.
Roethlisberger also has a knack for holding onto the ball though and scrambling around in the pocket looking for the big play down field. While at times that leads to big plays (ala his TD pass to Santonio Holmes last week), it also leads to him taking quite a bit of sacks. He was sacked 46 times during the regular season and another five times during their two post season games. Ben's a big, tough guy though and most of the time he bounces right back, but there have been games when the punishment got to him and affected his play. Five times this season Big Ben was sacked four or more times and those five games resulted in three losses and the offense averaging just 13 points per game. In fact here are some alarming stats for Ben's production and his effect on the Steelers when they can't protect him:
- Steelers record is 2-3 when Roethlisberger is sacked four or more times but a spectacular 10-1 when he's sacked three times or fewer.
- Roethlisberger has thrown just four touchdowns and turned the ball over 12 times (7 ints and 5 fumbles) in the games when he's been sacked four or more times.
So the moral of the story is simple, get after Ben Roethlisberger. But how?
The Cardinals find themselves in an interesting situation because they beat these Steelers last season and they did it by beating up and harassing Ben Roethlisberger from start to finish. He was sacked three times on his first four drives and he never got on track all day. He finished the game completing just 53%of his passes and he threw two interceptions. The encouraging news for the Cardinals is that they did all of their damage with their defensive line and that they didn't have to rely on heavy blitzes to break through the Steelers' line. Darnell Dockett was the star of the day with 2.5 sacks and a forced fumble while Antonio Smith also recorded a fumble and Bertrand Berry chipped in with half a sack. The most important thing for the Cardinals pass rushers to remember is that Ben will hold the ball too long at
times and they should give up on their pass rush just because it's been four, five or six seconds since the ball was snapped.
You might also be wondering, what's changed since these two teams last played each other? For the Steelers, their offensive line is almost completely different than it was last September. Here's a look at who was there last year and who's in the starting lineup right now:
LT - Marvel Smith out, Max Starks in: Smith was slowed by a bad back last season and he didn't last long this season either. Starks has stepped in and he's played like the guy who started every game for the Steelers' Super Bowl season in 2005. He's not the best pass blocker and he will struggle with speed rushers so don't be surprised if Chike Okeafor is unleashed more than normal this week. (On a side note, if you're hoping that the Cardinals pick up a OT in free agency, keep an eye on Starks. He's a UFA after this season and he's got a history with Whiz and Grimm).
LG - Alan Faneca out, Chris Kemoeatu in: The all-world Faneca left via free agency and Kemo has stepped in and had a decent season in his first year as a starter. Like Starks, Kemo's strong suit is being a mauler in the running game and he can be exploited by quick defensive linemen. He's also had problems picking up line stunts throughout the season so don't be surprised if the defensive line tries some 'twist-blitzes' on passing downs. (Kemo's also a UFA after this season and has history with this coaching staff.)
C - Sean Mahan out, Justin Hartwig in: Mahan was a disaster last year and he was cut in the off season. To fill his spot the Steelers signed Hartwig and the center of the OL has stabilized. Hartwig's not the biggest or strongest guy, but he holds his own and he's the veteran leader on an otherwise young offensive line. If Gabe Watson can command double teams on a consistent basis, it'll free up other guys to beat their man one-on-one.
RG - Kendall Simmons out, Darnell Stapleton in: Simmons went down early in the season, but the Steelers never really missed him. Stapleton reminds me alot of Lyle Sendlein because they are both undrafted, undersized centers, in fact they're almost the exact same size. Stapleton doesn't really do any one thing exceptionally well but he's a well rounded player who uses good technique and intelligence to get the job done.
RT - Willie Colon is still the guy: The only starter who remains from last years game is arguably the worst player on the offensive line. Colon looks like a guard and plays like one most of the time. He really struggles against speed rushers and at times won't even manage to touch his man (ala Terrell Suggs last week). Look for Bertrand Berrry and even Travis LaBoy to give Colon fits, if the Steelers don't give him some help.
A quick review of the current offensive line makes it pretty clear why Roethlisberger takes some abuse. When you pair a QB who likes to hold onto the ball too long and line that struggles in pass protection, the result is normally disasterous. Ben is like most QB's though and if you give him time in the pocket, he can certainly rip up a secondary. He's got a couple of legit speed receivers, an excellent possession receiver, a very good safety valve at tight end and a back who's capable reciever out of the backfield (Mewelde Moore, not Willie Parker). It will be imperative that the Cardinals put pressure on Ben Roethlisberger early and often. Can the Cardinals turn up the pressure with just the front three or four or will they have to send backers and A-dub to get the job done? How many sacks will they end up with?
0 recs |
26 comments
Comments
I'm impresed
I don’t know where you got all your information, but it wasn’t ESPN. You’re right on with just about every point. The Steelers offense has completely self destructed a couple times against good DL’s, particularly when paired with good bump and run CB’s. If you can get us into that mode, you’re chances of winning go up dramatically.
The more I look at this game, though, the more I think the Steelers running game is the key cog. Last year, the Cards not only got to Ben, but they completely shut out our running game. Parker was 19 for 37. This year, our running game has been feast (SD twice, NWE, HOU) or famine (PHL, DAL, IND, TEN). If you can stop our running game and get pressure, our offense would be in a lot of trouble, as it was in last year’s game.
I crunched some numbers a few weeks ago and found an interesting trend: when the Steelers faced defenses that were not in the top 10 in yardage, they outperformed the average stats of those defenses by a significant margin. When faced with defenses in the top 10, however (we faced a top 10 defense 7 times this season) we underperformed the average of those defenses by a significant margin.
Your defense has played uncharacteristically well in the playoffs thus far, so it’s hard to conclude how we will perform against your defense based on this trend. However, I think it shows that your defense needs to play a very good and aggressive game. If you don’t attack this offense, it suddenly becomes a very good one.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jan 27, 2009 9:37 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Cards' DLine
has been fairly solid so far in the postseason — shutting down two top-5 rushing attacks in Atlanta and Carolina.
"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski
by DbacksSkins on Jan 27, 2009 10:48 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Clearly they're capable of doing it, consistency has been the concern throughout the regular season
But there’s nothing “regular” about the post-season.
This game is going to come down to coaching. Both staff’s know each other well and ought to be able to recognize a lot of formations each team runs. Whoever is able to devise a new wrinkle that catches the other team by surprise is going to have a small advantage. Call me biased but Clancy has been known to create some bizarre looks in the middle of the game and that could be the difference between Ben imploding or Ben triumphant.
We all leave footprints in the sands of time, just watch out for the discarded fish hooks!
by Hawkwind on Jan 27, 2009 11:02 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I’ll give you credit for shutting down Turner, but Jake Delhomme shut down the Panthers rushing game. You guys let them run 15 times for 75 yards before they completely gave up on it.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jan 27, 2009 11:49 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Check the box score.
31 of those yards came on one carry.
"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski
by DbacksSkins on Jan 27, 2009 12:24 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh I forgot
Those don’t count.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jan 27, 2009 1:53 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
In a small sample size like that,
a single blown coverage on a sweep or counter can throw off the average. Nearly half the total rushing yards came on one carry. That’s significant, especially if you’re going to mention it as evidence that the Cards’ D “didn’t shut down the run” vs. Carolina.
"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski
by DbacksSkins on Jan 27, 2009 5:23 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
The sample size is somewhat small (not that small, though), but big runs always form a significant portion of total yardage. If you’re getting 3 ypc on most runs early in the game in addition to one long run, you’ll be sitting pretty in the 4th quarter if you can stick to it. I’d feel differently if 14 of the runs were for 20 total yards (effectively wasted downs) and the one big one was a 55 yard TD or something.
For an offense to give up a 10 yard run, one guy may have been the main culprit – a DL getting blown off the line or a LB leaving his gap or missing a tackle. For a guy to break a 30 yard run, something a lot worse has to have happened, usually a safety missing a tackle or taking a bad angle. After yard ~30 the additional yards become pretty cheap, as there’s usually no one else to make the tackle. A good run defense is as much about limiting the larger runs as it is about stuffing everything else: the Steelers didn’t give up a rushing play of 20 yards until week 9.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jan 27, 2009 7:50 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Pretty arbitrary standard, isn't it?
I guess where you stand depends on where you sit.
Panthers rushed for 2437 yards during the regular season (3rd in the NFL, 152 yards/game) and 30 rushing TDs (best in the league by 6 TDs!!) and averaged 4.8 YPC as a team. Against the Cards, outside of a single carry, they averaged 3.1 YPC. When they only rush 15 times total, a single long run throws off the math significantly. We’re not talking about the course of an entire season, when long runs are fairly frequent. We’re talking about 15 plays in one game. Over the course of a season, long runs are expected and average YPC effectively reflects that.
But the Panthers rushed 14 times for 44 yards. THAT is much more indicative of how they fared, on average, when carrying the ball than the 15 for 75.
"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski
by DbacksSkins on Jan 27, 2009 8:22 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Averages are exactly that
Throw out the long runs and you no longer have a true ‘average’.
If you really want to eliminate the one long run, to be fair you would have to also throw out the shortest (or largest negative gain) and then do the same for any other game/team/matchup you are comparing numbers to.
by AJ BirdWatcher on Jan 28, 2009 6:59 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
A look at D. Williams' stats
On the year, Williams had 16 runs of 20 or more yards, about 1 every 17 runs. He had 12 runs against you guys, one of which was over 20 yards. On the season, about 36 percent of his total yardage came from those big runs. Against you guys, 49 percent of his yards came on big runs. You guys got a tiny bit “unlucky”, if you will, in that regard.
However, if you look at his carries 1-10 and 10+ splits, he gets better as the game progresses, as do most RB’s. In his first 10 carries, he averaged only 2.9 ypc. After that, he averaged over 21 ypc. Even if you take out the 31 yard run, the Cards held him to 2.9 YPC which is exactly what he averaged all year on those carries, hardly “shutting him down”.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jan 28, 2009 9:38 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I'll concede the point,
as I’ve run out of reasonable arguments.
On another note, STEELERS SUCK!!
"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski
by DbacksSkins on Jan 28, 2009 8:23 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
If you don’t attack this offense, it suddenly becomes a very good one.
That may as well read: if the Cardinals defense doesn’t take the field, the Steelers offense will be very good.
There’s litte doubt that both teams’ defense will be in an all-out attack mode to start this game. Who can survive the blitzkreig? (Cue the Metallica song)
We all leave footprints in the sands of time, just watch out for the discarded fish hooks!
by Hawkwind on Jan 27, 2009 10:45 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Basically what I’m saying is that the Cardinals defense, which is not a top 10 defense, needs to play like a top 10 defense or they could be in serious trouble. If the Steelers can put long drives together (which we have against middling defenses), your offense will have to put up a lot of points in limited drives against a great defense.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jan 27, 2009 11:46 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Regular season stats = Linus' blue blanket
Clinging to what was done in the regular season is a dangerous trap to get yourself in. It makes a great point for discussion but rarely holds up in the post-season. Clinging to what was done as the reason something will happen is metaphorical thumb sucking. “Top 10” frankly doesn’t mean a thing at this point. Literally, the Cardinals are playing “Top 2” defense since they’re representing the NFC in the Super Bowl. The moment is now, the Super Bowl, not the regular season, not even ten days ago, the reality is what happens on February 1st. The only valid statistics that can be used for argument is what has happened in the post-season and even those statistics are only good for Super Bowl mental masterbation.
Yes, Jake Delhomme shut down the Panthers’ run offense because the Cardinals defense forced takeaways early that later induced more turnovers. There’s more ways to shutting down a running game than stuffing the RB at the line of scrimmage, BM. You, a fan of the Steelers, should know that as well as anyone. So don’t belittle the accomplishments of the Cardinals’ defense in the post-season thus far based on a 19th regualar season ranking. That blue blanket will choke you,
We all leave footprints in the sands of time, just watch out for the discarded fish hooks!
by Hawkwind on Jan 27, 2009 12:32 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Accomplishments vs. Identity
I agree that the fact that the Steelers finished first in so many stat categories doesn’t mean anything as far as an accomplishment. If the Steelers lose this game, I’m sure they won’t care what their stats were. However, what teams do in the regular season does begin to reveal what they are, and we demonstrated throughout the season that we had the best defense in the league and an average offense that beat up on bad defenses and crumbled against good ones. The Cardinals demonstrated that they had a pretty lousy defense, a poor running game, and a great passing attack. They didn’t suddenly become different teams in the playoffs. Maybe the coaches pulled out a few extra tricks they were saving, but they’re still the same players with the same coaches. Ask Ike Taylor if he’s watching film of Fitzgerald from the regular season, or if there’s no reason to look at anything before the past 3 games. Ask Whis if he’s looking back at games we had against the Giants and Eagles for ways to kill our offense.
Teams grow and change a little over the course of the season, but to say that a couple anomolous games (like getting 6 turnovers and avoiding a team’s greatest strength) give a better indication of what is to come than what’s been demonstrated over the course of a whole season is absurd. One game means almost nothing from a statistical perpective.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jan 27, 2009 2:28 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
The fact is..
That every team’s season is different. The Steelers had more to play for, such as, competition from the Ravens (as far as winning the division), and homefield in the playoffs. Once the Cardinals pretty much had the NFC West wrapped up due to NO competition, they really just stopped giving 100% effort. It sounds bad but this is a young team and probably didn’t know how to handle the situation. That situation can greatly change a teams “stats”, and its obvious this team is playing completely different in the post season.
Hey, hey, hey hey hey, watch the language, ok? I have a family.
Revenge of the Birds
by Andrew602 on Jan 27, 2009 3:16 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
And that skews the stats. It would be interesting to look at stats from the Cards first 10 or so games.
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jan 27, 2009 4:39 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
we looked pretty good then.
just think of the end of the season as a nightmare. it really seemed real until we woke up (the playoffs started) and we got back to normal. we started the season pretty balanced and kinda eased into one dimensional mode. now we’re back. balanced O and tenacious D. who’da thunk it?
by hevchv on Jan 27, 2009 9:50 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Seems to be around the bye week if I remember right
The Cards were a fairly balanced offence prior to that (minus the Jets disaster). The Carolina game in week 8 seems to be the point where they turned a little too pass heavy.
by AJ BirdWatcher on Jan 28, 2009 7:02 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Correct me if I’m wrong, but the disaster games against Philly and NYG came before you clinched your division, right? I mean, you were still trying to win those games weren’t you?
charity standing orders
by BadMaafala on Jan 28, 2009 9:43 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
True...
…but it was at that point a Cardinals win or 49ers loss and the Rams at home were coming up. The Giants game the Cards played all-out but the Giants were the better team that day. The Eagles game was an embarrassment that the short week is a likely culprit. The blowouts by the Vikings and Patriots are the games in question and the games remarked upon repeatedly by players during Media Day.
Realistically, this is all moot as aren’t teams trying to win every game on the schedule? Clearly the Cards didn’t do that in the regular season but have thus far in the post-season. I’ll take a Super Bowl appearance over a 12-4 regular season record any day. Just ask Carolina.
We all leave footprints in the sands of time, just watch out for the discarded fish hooks!
by Hawkwind on Jan 28, 2009 10:49 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
After 10 games Cards were 7-3.
And they didnt have a disaster game vs NYG. If Ralph Brown catches an onside kick that slips through his hands, that game may go to overtime.
Hey, hey, hey hey hey, watch the language, ok? I have a family.
Revenge of the Birds
by Andrew602 on Jan 28, 2009 5:43 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm going to jus refer to you as BM...
because you remind me of one!
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
by boogatt66 on Jan 28, 2009 10:58 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
You got served.
"Of course, it’s downright frightening to imagine how two Adam Dunns would turn the double play." - Joe Posnanski
by DbacksSkins on Jan 28, 2009 8:21 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
















