Arizona Cardinals Week Four Preview: Scouting the Houston Texans Offense
When the Arizona Cardinals and Houston Texans take the field on Sunday it'll be a match of two teams that have been mired in regular season mediocrity since the beginning of last year. Since the first week of the 2008 season the Cardinals and Texans are a combined 20-19 during the regular season and that's not where the similarities end. The two offenses that sport elite receivers and promising young tailbacks but what really drives the Texans' offense?
In order to get a better idea of what exactly makes the Texans' offense tick we decided to break down the history of their "big three." In an effort to stay consistent we'll primarily look at the period of time since Schaub became the starter in Houston.
Matt Schaub: Schaub's biggest problem since coming to Houston has been staying on the field (missed 10 games while playing in 26) but the Texans haven't fallen apart when he's on the sidelines. They've managed a 6-4 record with Shaub on the sidelines and have been just 12-14 with him at the helm. Here's a quick look at his stats in the Texan's wins and losses:
| Schaub | Comp | Attempts | Comp % | Yards | YPA | TD | INT | Sacks |
| Wins (12 games) | 21.9 | 33.0 | 66.4% | 297.7 | 9.0 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| Losses (14 games) | 18.6 | 28.7 | 64.7% | 197.1 | 6.9 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Total | 20.1 | 30.7 | 65.5% | 243.5 | 7.9 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.8 |
A couple of quick thoughts:
- First regardless of the outcome of a game, Schaub is an accurate passer. His completion rate in losses would still rank in the top ten among quarterbacks last season and a 66.4 completion percentage would have ranked fourth last season.
- One thing that strikes me as odd with these numbers is that his attempts actually go down when the Texans lose. As Cardinals fans we've grown accustomed to Warner throwing the ball all over the place once the team falls behind but I think in this case it might be more of a game plan issue than performance. His lack of attempts in losses might actually be attributed to the coaching staff either wanting to establish a running game early or they might not fully trust him at the beginning of games, although to be honest his attempts have increased each season and his attempts in losses are over 34 this season.
- The touchdown, interception and sack numbers are about what you'd expect. When he throws more touchdowns than picks and doesn't spend the entire day on his back, the Texans are more likely to win.
- The number that sticks out the most to me though is his yards per attempt. For those who aren't overly familiar with the "yards per attempt" statistic, 9.0 would have led the NFL in 2008 by more than half a yard while the 6.8 mark would have ranked him some where around 20th in the league. The ability to stretch the field is vitally important to his offense, but more on that in a bit.
Steve Slaton: Slaton is entering his second season so we'll obviously only be talking about 20 games here but he started 15 games last season and ended the year with 268 carries so he had quite an impact on the offense.
| Slaton | Att | Yds | Avg | TD | Rec | Yds | Avg | TD | Total Touches | Total Yards | Total TDs |
| Wins (10 games) |
19.7 | 80.5 | 4.1 | 0.6 | 2.7 | 24.1 | 9.0 | 0.1 | 22.4 | 104.6 | 0.7 |
| Losses (10 games) |
13.0 | 66.9 | 5.1 | 0.4 | 4.1 | 31.2 | 7.6 | 0.1 | 17.1 | 98.1 | 0.5 |
| Total | 16.4 | 73.7 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 27.7 | 8.2 | 0.1 | 19.7 | 101.4 | 0.6 |
A couple of quick thoughts:
- Honestly I don't think there's much to learn from Slaton's splits other than that he's a complete tailback. When the Texans fall behind he's just as, if not more, dangerous because of his ability to catch the ball out of the backfield.
- One thing that isn't shown on this table but is worth mentioning is that Slaton has had some fumbling issues this season after being relatively sure handed last season. He's already lost as many fumbles as he did all of last season (two) and he's put four balls on the turf as opposed to just three all of last season.
Andre Johnson: Last but certainly not least is a man that needs no introduction. Johnson, as Pyro explained earlier, is simply a beast. He's big, he's fast and he can single handily take over games. One thing that stands out pretty clearly is that the Texans are a much better team when Johnson is on the field. He missed seven games during the 2007 season and the team went 3-4 but in the remaining 29 games since Schaub became the starting QB, the Texans are 16-13.
| Johnson | Rec | Yds | Avg | TDs |
| Wins (16 games) | 7.9 | 118.9 | 15.0 | 0.9 |
| Losses (13 games) | 5.2 | 66.2 | 12.6 | 0.3 |
| Total | 6.7 | 95.2 | 14.2 | 0.6 |
A couple of quick thoughts
- First, those stats are more than acceptable, win or lose. The difference in the production though quite simply says it all. To put it simply, when Johnson has big games, the Texans win. If he is somewhat contained, their chances of winning diminish greatly.
- In fact, Johnson has produced 13 games of at least 100 yards since the beginning of the 2007 season and ten of those have led to Texan victories, including a game this season against the Titans.
- One other thing worth mentioning is the difference in his yards per catch between wins and losses. Two and half yards might not seem like much but think of how that effects a QB's yards per attempt statistic. In games where Johnson is able to make big plays the Texans' offense as a whole is more productive.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That's obviously a rather condensed look at the Texans offense and there will certainly be more offensive players who will help determine the outcome of this game, but Schaub, Slaton and Johnson constitute the "big 3." How can we make them producing "losing" numbers?
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
So basically,
Take the passing game away and we should win. Seems easy right? No.
Hey, hey, hey hey hey, watch the language, ok? I have a family.
Revenge of the Birds
by Andrew602 on Oct 6, 2009 3:46 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
How can you make them prodcue losing numbers?
You can’t.
But all is not lost! Fortunately for you, the Texans find ways to shoot THEMSELVES in the foot every week!
Seriously though, I know Arizona has a great receiver corp, no disputing it. I would say that the Texans are easily as talented and probably more dangerous.
Here is why.
1. Andre Johnson: You cannot cover him. It’s been tried. Double team? doesnt work. Andre is one of those freakish guys who is taller, faster and stronger than anyone fast enough to hang with him. For case in point, just youtube him and watch him rip balls away from double teams all day.
2. Owen Daniels: Pro bowl tight end. Owen is incredible. People talk about Schaub, Slaton and AJ but rarely mention Owen Daniels. Last year he had 70 receptions for 862 yards on his way to the pro bowl. If he is not covered, he makes teams pay.
3. Kevin Walter: Perhaps the most underrated white guy in the league. He has crazy hands and makes tough catches all day long that other guys drop.
4. Jacoby Jones: Gauraunteed to fumble one punt a game. That aside, he is faster than lightning and crazy dangerous to break returns for TDs.
5. Andre Davis: Another over achieving talented guy. He is open often because AJ draws the double team and has awesome speed.
The short of it is that there is no “weak link” in our receiver corp. We actually have more good guys than we can possibly play at one time. The obvious strategy is double team AJ and pray, but that doesn’t work well.
What’s the catch? Pressure.
The ONLY way to deal with Houston passing game is pressure on schaub.
You HAVE to get in his face. Do that and you can disrupt the passing game.
You aren’t going to do it simply by having a good secondary, there are just too many threats to cover.
Of course Arizona should know this, you guys have a couple of threats of your own and pressuring Warner will be our best method of shutting down Boldin/Fitzgerald.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Oct 6, 2009 4:16 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Well if we're just gonna mention all our receivers...
Then behind Q/Fitz you have Breaston (who could be a #2 for most teams), Urban (who is a bad white boy himself), Doucet (who is just stuck behind so much depth) and Patrick (a TE you better be glad isn’t playing). These guys are all explosive. Then you have our receiving backs in Hightower, LSH and Wright. Oh and seriously, do you want Wells to run the ball?
Life's too short. Be a fan. Orlando Magic, Arizona Cardinals,Tampa Bay Rays and of course "the U"! What a winning combo.
by hevchv on Oct 6, 2009 7:39 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Actually, yea I do want to see Beanie run,
Yeah, he had a case of fumblitis, but I would like to see more of him. We need that one two punch. Hightower does a good job of falling forward, but doesn’t have that break away threat. Wells does and I think he should be given more chances.
A man from Dallas who bleeds red, not silver and blue.
by Sir Whirly on Oct 6, 2009 7:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
what?
Seriously though, I know Arizona has a great receiver corp, no disputing it. I would say that the Texans are easily as talented and probably more dangerous.
I’m sorry but if you seriously think that, then your are certifiably crazy. I’ll give you Fitz and Johnson are a wash. I’m sure 99% of Cards fans would take Fitz while the same amount of Texans fans would take AJ. Looking at the #2 WR is a no-contest. Boldin is five times the receiver of Walter. Looking at the #3 wide out/deep threat is just as lopsided. Breaston is ten time the receiver of Jones. Going four deep, Urban’s season last year was better than any of Davis’ years in Houston. Tight ends is a no-brainer. Owen Daniels would kill each one of our guys but bottom line, don’t talk to Cardinals fans about how talented your receiving corps is and seriously, “easily as talented and probably more dangerous?” You were joking right?
Andre Davis: Another over achieving talented guy. He is open often because AJ draws the double team and has awesome speed.
So a former second round pick who’s never established himself as a starter or recorded more than 40 catches or had 600 yards receiving is an overachiever? Come man, he’s just a guy. You’ve got a great #1 receiver who opens things up for a bunch of other “guys.”
No one is saying that Walter or Jones or Davis can’t hurt a defense but opposing teams don’t game plan around stopping Andre Davis.
Be careful....to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
by Bezekira on Oct 7, 2009 6:38 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Im not suggesting opposing teams game plan around stopping Andre Davis.
Im saying that the rest of our receiver corp is VERY talented, and when you double team AJ they get unleashed in a big way.
I KNOW this is hard for you to buy, but after Sunday you will understand what I am saying. We don’t have big names behind AJ, but we have big talent.
Again I know you won’t buy it now because you don’t watch the Texans, but after Sunday you will see what I am talking about.
It’s not about the stats, it is entirely about the results and big catches when you need them. Play making.
And I am not disputing that the Cardinals have arguably the best receiving corp in football. I just happen to believe that our guys can match whatever they can do in the passing game.
Assuming we don’t unleash “Operation Epic Fail”, which we have a habit of doing after wins.
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Oct 7, 2009 8:13 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd argue that wide receivers are judged almost solely on stats
You’re initial point was that the Texans receiving depth chart was just as impressive, if not “more dangerous” than the Cardinals, so I ask you: Without starting a Fitz vs. AJ debate, who on Texans depth chart at wide receiver is better than his counterpart on the Cardinals depth chart?
Walter vs. Boldin
Jones vs. Breaston
Davis vs. Urban
Be careful....to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
by Bezekira on Oct 7, 2009 8:44 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah I'd say the Texans do have a lot of receiving talent
And they can make the “big” catch or play if needed.
But you are seriously underestimating Anquan Boldin. The guy’s a top 10 receiver to most NFL fans and could easily be a number one on 20+ other teams. He’s just been overshadowed by Fitz lately. Then you take the other 1,000 yard receiver in Breaston, who’s very important to the offense. Comparing him to Jones does not justice. Urban is a poor mans Steve Breaston. He just drops the ball when you need a big catch.
Hey, hey, hey hey hey, watch the language, ok? I have a family.
Revenge of the Birds
by Andrew602 on Oct 7, 2009 10:31 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Im not underestimating Anquan Boldin...
Trust me, I love the guy. He is on most of my fantasy teams!
Let me reiterate, I am not disputing the awesomeness of your receiving corp.
Also pulled some stats just for the sake of fun, stats from last year are of course meaningless for the most part.
From last year, regular season:
Cardinals:
Passing – 418/630 4875 yds 66% cmp pct
Rushing – 340 1178 yds
Texans:
Passing – 367/555 4474 yds 66% cmp pct
Rushing – 432 1846 yds
"An open mind is like a fortress with it's gates unbarred and unguarded."
The ROSENFAIL : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAKAKE-uq-8&feature=related
by TexansForever on Oct 7, 2009 12:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs



















