Grading the Defense: Cardinals vs Panthers
The Cardinals defense was run over by the Panthers this past Sunday and it's now their turn to be graded by the ROTB faithful. The Panthers exploited the Cardinals defense every opportunity they could, and dared the Cardinals to stop the run - the Cardinals never accepted the challenge. Even with 14 passes thrown by Jake Delhomme, the Cardinals couldn't see the run coming. Everyone in the leauge knows that DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart are talented backs, but no one on the Cardinals defense wanted to recognize it. 270 rushing yards later and the Cardinals are facing the aftermath. Only time will tell if Bill Davis can get a fire burning under the defense, but they'll need to wake up quickly as they face Matt Forte next week. Let's dish out the grade.
Defensive line: The defense line can't be faulted completely, as the linebackers are equally responsible, but allowing that many rushing yards is not acceptable. Darnell Dockett suffered a strained groin early, and when the defensive line loses him or he's not playing at 100%, they can't compensate. The long 77 yard run was the biggest dagger in the heart of the offense, and the defensive line was completely pushed out of the way. The defense line failed miserably pressuring Delhomme, and one sack for the entire game on the quarterback will not get the job done.
Linebackers: Several linebackers missed very important tackles, or were blown out of big rushing plays in the first half. Karlos Dansby was a tackling machine, but it wasn't enough to stop the Panthers rushing attack. Poor tackling has to be the story of the game. DeAngelo Williams can break tackles like the best of them, but there were plenty of times were the Cardinals got to the running back and let Panthers running backs break away. The linebackers are very important to a 3-4 defense and cannot continue to play defense this way for the remainder of the season.
Defensive Backs: There's not a lot to judge the defensive backs on after the game, mainly due to the Panthers gameplan of running the ball. The defensive back's primary job all game was stopping the run once it broke through the defensive line and linebackers. The only passing touchdown given up was a sideline throw to Steve Smith, who beat cornerback Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie. DRC looked like he was expecting safety help over the top, and was beat by the time the ball was released.
My Defensive Grade: D
Allowing 270 rushing yards and 34 points in one game is never a cause for celebration. The defense played a terrible game and because of their second half effort, they came away with a D. They need to focus on their opponent, and stop buying into their own hype. The Cardinals defense has enough talent to play with the best of teams, and they'll need to start showing that starting this week. What did you grade the defense and why?
0 recs |
15 comments
|
Comments
D?
If that was a F’d up performance I don’t know what one is. They allowed the Panthers to run freakin’ wild on them and offered very little resistance.
As far as I’m concerned, no one on this defense had a good game (not even my man-crush Campbell). Every position group deserves a failing grade.
Be careful....to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
by Bezekira on Nov 3, 2009 12:49 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
I gave an F as well.
They allowed 3 straight scoring drives, got just 1 sack, and no turnovers. They also allowed over 350 yards. That is inexcusable for a defense that is very talented.
by Pyromnc on Nov 3, 2009 12:51 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
If I was grading the first and a half quarter I would give an F
But truth is, from 7:33 in the second quarter the defense didn’t allow a touchdown the rest of the game. True, they put the team in a hard spot to win, but the offense should’ve took advantage and made the comeback. Instead, Warner throws a pick six and 5 more turnovers and the game was lost.
What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds
by Andrew602 on Nov 3, 2009 1:46 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I sorta see what you're saying
but once you have your ass beat down, it’s beat down. If a boxer get’s cut, bloodied and knocked down four times in the first two rounds but them somehow manages to go the distance, he still got his ass beat.
Forget when and how everything happened and look at the numbers:
- 270 yards rushing (over 6 ypc)
- 27 points allowed
- 0 forced turnovers
Now consider that you allowed all of that to a team that was averaging 15.6 points per game coming in and was sporting a 2-4 record coming in.
One more point: The Panthers’ TD drives weren’t short yardage gifts. They went 74 yards, 87 yards and 75 yards. Forget about what the offense did or didn’t do. When your defense gives up three long drives like this, you’re going to lose.
Be careful....to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
by Bezekira on Nov 3, 2009 2:21 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Looking at stats, yeah the Panthers weren't scoring a lot
But they’re the same team as last year that had a 1st round bye. The difference is the terrible play by Jake Delhomme. They took Delhomme out and handed the ball everytime and their really good running backs did what they were supposed to do.
What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds
by Andrew602 on Nov 3, 2009 4:10 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Turnovers kill the D
I gave the Defense a C because they performed well enough in the second half to win, but the offense gave them no rest and horrible field position to work with. Had we run on half of those passing-turnovers, this game would’ve been cake.
by ajotanelsona on Nov 3, 2009 1:06 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
We were playing to our strength...
and out strength is the pass. Problem is when Warner always has one of those games where he just stinks up the joint every season and that was this game. Also, since the defense was so nice to allow 21 points on 3 consecutive drives it made it difficult for us to really run the ball when we are down 14 points and it is almost the end of the first half.
by Pyromnc on Nov 3, 2009 1:10 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I can see your point. I think they should deserve a C for the excellent second half effort and put the blame where it does belong on the offense. Turnovers and failed connections were the story of the game and the ultimate reason for the L, not truly the D’s fault.
Section 102, Row 18
by CardsFan08 on Nov 3, 2009 6:01 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I Agree
I agree with you that “had we run of half of those passing-turnovers, this game would’ve been cake.” We ran 6 times and passed 5 on our first scoring drive averaging almost 6 yards per run. After the Warner pass to Peppers, we only ran 7 more times the rest of the game. Really poor play calling in my opinion.
by WeiWuWei on Nov 4, 2009 2:15 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I gave them an A
For effort. I think if you go out and try then you should get some kind of trophie at the end of the year. GO TEAM!
by badmatty53 on Nov 3, 2009 3:55 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Well as a Bears fan i expect a ass whooping and I think the rest of Bears nation are silently expecting the same…………
by bears rock on Nov 3, 2009 4:23 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
One week we're up, one week we're down
And last week we were down, so here’s to hoping!
by tw3kr on Nov 5, 2009 12:00 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds
by Andrew602 on Nov 5, 2009 8:57 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
























