Revenge Of The Birds: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: The Record of Wrongs: Vanderbilt Commodores

Should Warner get the HOOK?



I think that we should give Leinart a shot.  Let's face it we just lost to the Panthers.  Can it get any worse?  I really want to know what all the Cardinal fans think about this situation.  We have a  young eager QB ready to step in and help the team win, and on the other hand we an old, slow QB that has thrown 11 TD's and 11 INT's with the best receiving core in the NFL!  The NFL isn't about making friends or what happend the year before (look what happend with Bledsoe and Brady) it's a business and if a QB isn't performing, it's just like anyone of us not doing our job!  Do you get a little slap on the wrist or do you lose your job?  Your gone!  This preseason and during practice Leinart clearly has shown that he is ready and that's according to Coach Whiz.  WHAT DO OUR CARDINAL FANS FEEL SHOULD GO DOWN? Stay with the old guy and watch the ship sink or go with the new guy and see the future?  

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Revenge of the Birds' (ROTB) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of ROTB's editors.

1 recs  |  Comment 116 comments  |  Add comment

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Absolutely not

Kurt Warner didn’t lose the game for the Cardinals on Sunday. The Defense couldn’t tackle, couldn’t stop the run, and only 2 of the INT’s were completely Kurt’s fault. Warner definitely gives us the best chance to win this year, and while I think Leinart is the long term QB, until Warner is the reason we are losing games, he should and will be the starter.
A QB change at this point (while in 1st place mind you) would do more to throw off the team as anything else.

The biggest problem the Cardinals have is that they throw the ball almost 70% of the time. Every team in the league would have a hard time throwing when the other defense knows it’s coming. What the cards should do is put an emphasis on runniong the ball 30-35 times a game, and let Beanie and Hightower take the pressure off of Warner. This will open up the play action, and allow more big plays, while giving the defense more time to rest in between series. This team can definitely run the ball if they put the focus on it. Look what happened in the playoffs last season when we put the emphasis on running the ball. it forced opposing defenses to adjust and allowed the Cardinals to take advantage of mismatches in defensive personel and alignment.

by robloosli on Nov 4, 2009 4:05 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

Last time I checked we are still first in the division

Benching Warner is not the solution. Building confidence and getting him to throw downfield are the goal. Whether we accomplish that by running or just start throwing to Fitz no matter whether or not his is covered, I don’t care.

by Drullin'OverDaCards on Nov 4, 2009 6:27 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

A little info

Just to let you guys know that we are in first place in probably the worst division in the NFL. There’s not another division you can go 9-7 and still make the playoffs. Are you guys just planning on getting to the playoffs and just losing, because Warner playing the way he’s playing now will probably throw 5 or 6 picks against the Vikings or Saints! And we’ll be out of the playoffs real quick. And only two balls were tipped for int’s 3 were his fault and he also had a lost fumble – 6 TO’s that ridiculous for a starter QB in the NFL. And if wouldn’t throw off the team because it would show that team that these coaches mean business and getting back to the super bowl is the main priority (and it doesn’t matter how they get there), and to not just being content with being a first round exit in the playoffs. Can you honestly say if we played the Saints right now first round we would win? It would probably be 42-17, if that – The Saints winning of course.

by js10jj on Nov 4, 2009 6:45 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

rable, rable, rable

rable rable rable rable

by badmatty53 on Nov 5, 2009 4:37 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

1 was tipped, 1 was dropped by a receiver, and 1 was a freak play by a freak athlete (Peppers) that is an INT 1 out of 100 times. The fumble was his fault, but every QB is allowed a bad game now and then. Will the Cards beat the Saints in the playoffs? I don’t know, but last year no one thought they would beat the Falcons, the Panthers, the Eagles, etc. If you have watched this team at all, you would know that Warner gives them the best chance at winning.

by robloosli on Nov 5, 2009 6:49 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Warner usually has these every year...

and he rebounds from them. Last year after that horrid Jets game he cam back with a nice performance against the Bills throwing for 250 yards and 2 touchdowns, no turnovers. 2 years ago he had that bad game against Seattle and he came back the next week against New Orleans with a 3 touchdown performance, did have 2 turnovers though.

I think we will see more of the same this week, Warner will show why he is the starter right now against the Bears.

by Pyromnc on Nov 5, 2009 8:46 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

every one is entitled but

6 turnovers is unnaceptable

The Devil Birds just got cha

by DaCards on Nov 7, 2009 8:54 AM MST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

how do you type in your straight jacket?

complete drivel … take Warner and the Cards lightly at your peril, they showed last year what ‘the worst playoff team in history’ can do.

As far as Leinart, hes had more than a few shots to prove hes ready, and hes not … Whiz has said from the time he came here that he is going to play the guys that give him the best chance to win now, and its painfully obvious to anyone paying attention that that is Warner.

seriously bro, you’re just hatin’

No question Kurt Warner is waaaaay to happy about his relationship with god, and his wife is a bit scary … but on the field he has the respect of every coach and defense in the league.

by quid pro quo on Nov 5, 2009 5:50 AM MST reply actions   0 recs

+1

We all know that Warner has his bad games every now and then. And every quarterback does. He’ll bounce back this Sunday, especially since he’s been playing a lot better on the road then at home.

What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds

by Andrew602 on Nov 5, 2009 9:02 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Warner is averaging 250 yards, 1 turnover, and about 2 touchdowns per game on the road this season. Total numbers: 750 passing yards 3 turnovers (2 interceptions 1 fumble lost) and 5 touchdowns thrown. He also has a 73% completion percentage.

At home he has 6 touchdowns but has 9 interceptions and 3 fumbles (1 lost), 1164 yards passing and a 60% completion percentage. He’s averaging less than 2 touchdowns a game, 290 yards a game (partly because they abandon the run), a little more than 2 turnovers a game, and the biggest stat that jumped out was the completion percentage. The completion precentage went from 73% to 60%, that’s a big difference.

by Pyromnc on Nov 5, 2009 10:06 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Good point

And you can throw one of those interceptions on the road out the window. It was a long hail mary that was picked off to end the half in Seattle.

What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds

by Andrew602 on Nov 5, 2009 10:44 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

what if

That game is the super bowl is it ok then no. You are a pro you can not make those mistake and every now and again I blame warner for 2 games this year but I don’t say pull him I make him watch more tape. And prepare a little more this week

The Devil Birds just got cha

by DaCards on Nov 7, 2009 8:59 AM MST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Warner always has one or two awful games a year

not that I don’t want to see what Matt can do, but as someone else mentioned earlier we are 1st place in our division. That’s not usually the best time to bench your starting QB. If Warner throws 5 picks against the Bears I will probably be campaining for Leinart more than anyone, but for now i say let the grey beard redeem himself….. you know Carolina had been planning for this game for a long time.

by CardsDefense on Nov 5, 2009 10:52 AM MST reply actions   0 recs

This is one of the most ridiculous posts I've ever read at this site
Let’s face it we just lost to the Panthers.

So I guess the Eagles should shut it down for the rest of the season too since they lost to the Raiders.

(look what happend with Bledsoe and Brady)
Do you even remember what happened? Bledsoe got hurt not replaced.

I simply don’t get it. KW has always been a QB who will have a terrible game or two throughout the course of a full season. Did we bench him after the Jets, Eagles or Vikings game last year? How did that work out for us? Decisions in this league aren’t made on a one game basis.

Be careful....to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

by Bezekira on Nov 6, 2009 7:04 AM MST reply actions   0 recs

I suppose

We could lose to the Rams. Or we could lose to the Titans in a few weeks. But instead we lost to a team that was 12-4 last year, looking for revenge for the beating we laid on them in their house last January. Was it a game we should have won? Probably. But we didn’t. And now the game is in the past. Every year good teams are going to lose some games they should have won, it’s a fact of life in the NFL.

When all is said and done, we still have 9 games left, and we’re still in 1st place. We are playing outstanding football on the road, and will win some games at home down the stretch. I know we’re still supporting a playoff team, and once the postseason starts anything can happen.

by robloosli on Nov 6, 2009 8:39 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Is this 2008 or 2009?

I don’t care what happend last year and if you ever played or coached football you know that. Everyone sounds like a bunch of girls from “He’s just not that into you” making up all these excuses for your man (Warner). It’s ridiculous! And also pathetic that we all give him a crap game and then say he always has a bad game and then comes back strong. Did we all forget this is the NFL? Not some flag league that who cares if we lose a game here or there. After last year they should of picked up right where they left off. But they didn’t because Warner had ANOTHER CRAP GAME against San Francisco in the opener, oh well wait let me hear all the girl excuses on why it wasn’t Warner’s fault!

Listen I have played as long as I could through college and after that and have been coaching college football every since, and when a guy is playing this bad I don’t care if it’s Joe Montana you pull him. Because lets face and be serious it hasn’t just been one game for Warner this season. And when you do this it does a couple things, first – it brings another facet to your team with a different, fresh QB and that could either work for you or not, second – it could light a fire in the QB that just got pulled and now will do anything for another shot and when he gets it, he’ll make the best of it, and third – the second string QB could take over and never look back and your team could get to the pinnacle of their season. Where is the negative aspect of this move?

So I say put in Matt. Since we are in first place what do we have to lose! If we lose another game who cares then put Warner back in, it really seems that you guys don’t care if we lose a game here or there anyway. But what If we put him in and we kill the Bears than what – oh I know what all the girls commenting here would say " Kurt would’ve done the same thing!" Grow up and finally face reality. Last year was a cinderella season for Kurt, his last hoorah! And yeah he was a very successful QB, but he’s just done now and that’s life. It’s happens to the best of them. We just have to realize it before it’s too late. If he stays in don’t say I didn’t tell you so. I guess he really does have to have another 4 or 5 pick game, get sacked a whole bunch (well that happens all the time and it’s not all the lines fault when your QB probably runs a 6 second 40), for everyone to say he’s done and it’s not just his alloted 1 mess up game a year. So I guess we’ll see the outcome after Sunday.

by js10jj on Nov 6, 2009 9:27 AM MST reply actions   0 recs

They played like crap as a team in their 3 losses.

You cannot blame just Warner for his play in their losses. With the exception of the Niners game, the defense played like crap in their losses. The offensive line could not block my grandma if they tried. Receivers are dropping passes they would not have dropped last season and our running backs have gotten a case of fumblitis. You gonna pull all these guys because of their bad games too?

Lets not forget when Warner has been given time he has been among the best, 24/26 and no turnovers against Jacksonville, 26/38, and no turnovers against Houston, 32/41 against Seattle 2 turnovers (1 a fluky interception), and 20/36 and 1 turnover against the Giants.

Constantly changing QB during the season is not good for a team, look at Tampa last season Gruden kept changing who his starting QB would be. It is best to stick with one QB during the season rather than changing it up, especially when you are in the playoff race and have more wins that losses.

by Pyromnc on Nov 6, 2009 9:52 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

That sounds like a great plan

We’ll just change QB’s every time we lose a game. On second thought, let’s not stop there. If a CB gives up a TD, bench him. If a RB get’s tackled in the back field, bench him. If a LB misses a tackle, bench him.

We’ll play carousel with the whole. That’s the best idea I’ve ever heard coach.

Be careful....to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

by Bezekira on Nov 6, 2009 9:58 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Bezekira Grow Up

QB’s are the exception and when CB gets beat deep continously, like the continous bad play of Warner yeah they do get benched. If a running back keeps fumbling he does get benched, do you not watch football. Someone can’t continously keep doing something, and that’s how I feel Warner is playing – continously bad! But I guess you don’t see it that way. IT’S EVERYONE ONE ELSE FAULT JUST LIKE I THOUGHT YOU WOULD SAY!

by js10jj on Nov 6, 2009 10:03 AM MST reply actions   0 recs

We should start a petition

For js10jj to take over coaching responsibilities from Whisenhunt, since he clearly knows more and would make better decisions than a head coach in the NFL…

I’m pretty sure it was Warner’s fault that Carolina ran for 270 yards and 3 TDs on the Cardinals defense, forcing the team to have to play from behind and throw on nearly every down, which made it really easy for the Carolina defense to play against the pass. I mean it’s not like the Panthers had the top passing defense in the league going into the game against the Cardinals or anything…

by robloosli on Nov 6, 2009 10:08 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

cause Whiz does not know what the hell he is doing, he must be stupid for keeping Warner in as the starter. We need to get Whiz out of their now and replace him with this genius.

by Pyromnc on Nov 6, 2009 10:16 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Yea, cause Warner has sucked it up this year.

He has not set the record for completion percentage in one game, he is not in the top 10 of completion percentage on they year, he is not on pace for 4300 yards, he is not on pace for 25 touchdowns, oh wait…

by Pyromnc on Nov 6, 2009 10:10 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Well

it’s not like 4300 yards and 25 TDs makes a good season…What’s that? Those are good numbers for a season? Oh.

I guess since we’re not in first place, it’s time to panic. Especially since winning your division only gets you into the playoffs if your division isn’t weak.

I guess it’s time to give up on my team for the season. It’s too bad there aren’t 9 more games to play, we might have a chance at salvaging the season.

by robloosli on Nov 6, 2009 10:19 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

by the numbers

Then he puts up 25 ints and we go 8-8. I would rather have a team with a winning team then pro bowl numbers. Look at drew brees last year best qb #s in league last year didn’t make the playoffs

The Devil Birds just got cha

by DaCards on Nov 7, 2009 9:03 AM MST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Puh-leeeeeeeeeze

I think we understand where you are coming from, and nobody is saying that Warner played well at all last week.

You keep on ignoring any argument that disagrees with you. Please answer these questions:

1.) Last year, Warner had three awful games: Jets, Eagles, Patriots. According to your logic, we should have pulled him immediately. Would you have given up the super bowl run last year? Or are you trying to tell me Leinart would have been able to make the same plays?

2.) Will you accept this challenge? If Warner continues to play poorly for the rest of the season, (We can measure this by QB rating—if he is not above the league average you win) I will get on here and post a fanpost where I will publicly tell everyone that you were absolutely right. I will write a poem about how insightful and brilliant you are, and will humbly ask your forgiveness for comparing you to Uncle Rico (see below). If these things don’t happen you have to write an argument for why KW deserves to go into the hall of fame, and a copy of his acceptance speech. You in?

3.) What college-level football coach insults everyone with references to “He’s just not that into you” and calling everyone “girls”? You sound like a seventh grade superstar. I’m not into ad hominem attacks, but if you’re going to try and establish credibility Uncle Rico-style (Click here for the reference), you’re opening yourself up to a whole lot of criticism my friend.

by bcloirao on Nov 6, 2009 10:22 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Can't we just agree to disagree
Someone can’t continously keep doing something,

But you can obviously keep making the same point over and over and over.

You don’t think Warner should be the starter. We get it.
You think Leinart should be the starter. We get it.

Just because we don’t agree with you doesn’t mean that we’re all little girls. You have made your point and obviously we’re trying to make ours. I’m sure I’m not the only one starting to get tired-head from this round and round discussion. Maybe I’ll go beat my head against a wall for a break.

Be careful....to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

by Bezekira on Nov 6, 2009 11:25 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Yup

and if it is still that way at the end of the season and we miss the playoffs, and don’t win the division, then we can talk about putting in Leinart.

I’d be willing to bet a lot of money that he ends up the season with more TDs than INTs.

by robloosli on Nov 6, 2009 10:23 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

The number of picks is obviously skewed, as he hasn't thrown 11 picks over the coarse of the season.

5 came on Sunday.

What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds

by Andrew602 on Nov 6, 2009 10:56 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

bcloriao I'm totally IN!

I’m speaking the truth with the “He Just Not That Into You” and “girls” remarks because that’s exactly what it sounds like – Denial! If peopel don’t like it, I don’t care. It’s my opinion. And why doesn’t anyone ever answer any of my direct questions? Does what happen in the past, last year 5, 6, or 7 years ago in the NFL really matter? And also this is what drives me crazy, why are people so mediocre? Instead of trying to win as many games possible people are saying if we lose and don’t make the playoffs then no big deal we’ll just put Leinart in next year! That’s a loser mentality, not a winner mentality! Do you think the Saints, Colts, Vikings, Broncos, and Patriots all the elite teams in the NFL right now (not last year) are thinking "Hey if we drop a couple games here or there, it’s NO BIG DEAL! Yeah right! They don’t think of any their games like that. Why are WE! Everyone is so confident in Warner, it’s safe to say that if Warner stays at QB this season the Cardinals wil not, I REPEAT WILL NOT MAKE IT BACK TO THE SUPER BOWL. And mark my words on that!

by js10jj on Nov 6, 2009 10:58 AM MST reply actions   0 recs

That's a pretty easy prediction.

Every team has a 1/32nd chance at making it to the Super Bowl. I would’nt even feel comfortbale predicting the Saints to make it, just because any team has a chance once they’re in the playoffs. We’re a prime example.

What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds

by Andrew602 on Nov 6, 2009 11:16 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Answers to your direct questions

There were two:

1.) Does what happened in the past in the NFL really matter?

It absolutely does. If you have a player who has a history (years and years worth) of doing something well, and for a short period of time is not performing up to those expectations, do you give up on him immediately? No. You look at his history, and you expect him to return to his normal performance. Every great quarterback has bad games. Look at Peyton Manning last year. He wasn’t right for most of the year, but did they replace him? Nope. If this was not the case, we would be seeing a lot more of Jim Sorgi, Chase Daniel, and Sage Rosenfels quarterbacking your “elite teams” right out of the playoffs.

2.) Why are people so mediocre?

I don’t think anyone is accepting mediocrity. Nobody is suggesting that it is okay for Warner to lose games. Where your opinion is fundamentally different from everyone else’s is in who gives us the best chance to win. I understand that you think it is Leinart. In my opinion, giving the job to Leinart mid-season is giving up on our chances for this year. In my opinion, Warner is still the best QB on the roster.

I’m going to hold you to our bet. Don’t go and disappear as soon as KW starts playing well again. That would be “girly”.

by bcloirao on Nov 6, 2009 11:18 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

TD's - INT's

Yeah the picks might be skewed, but the TD’s aren’t! 11 TD’s with the best receiving core in the NFL. That’s a joke. People don’t remember Leinart didn’t have this developed receiving core and defense to back him up, and they still were in the game with teams that were all decided by 3 points or less.

by js10jj on Nov 6, 2009 11:01 AM MST reply actions   0 recs

True

His touchdowns should be higher. Can’t deny that.

What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds

by Andrew602 on Nov 6, 2009 11:16 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

For a "football coach"

You sure don’t seem to pay attention to all the circumstances. The Cardinals pass the ball on 70% of their plays. Every team they play knows they are going to pass on 7 out of 10 plays and is able to game plan for it. They don’t even make an effort to try and hide it, which is a much bigger problem than Warner having a bad game every now and then.

I don’t think anyone has said it’s ok to lose, but only 2 teams in the history of the NFL have made it through the regular season undefeated, so it stands to reason that the Cardinals (and every other team) will lose sometimes. We lost 3 games this year, and there are still 9 to play. We probably won’t win all of them. But no matter what, you c

We all get it js10jj, you want Leinart to play. No problem. The Cards might not make the Super Bowl with Warner at QB this year, but how often does any team in the NFL make it to back to back Super Bowls?

by robloosli on Nov 6, 2009 11:17 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Someone please give js10jj a tutorial on how to use the reply button

And maybe a quick breakdown of how to run a spell checker.

Be careful....to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

by Bezekira on Nov 6, 2009 11:21 AM MST reply actions   0 recs

Sorry I didn't I was back in Junior High

Am I replying to the right person now. Sorry I spelled one person’s screen name wrong. So if they passed the ball 70% of the time don’t you think that he should be completing more balls then. And the real reason he has sucked this year is just another year of getting older and a messed up hip, and teams know that they could just blitz him because he can’t move and if they play man under he has no quick release or hot read and it’s going to result in a sack, or a bad throw/pick. If a QB can scramble a little better and just maybe elude one defender then the defense is screwed (especailly with our receiving core). But he can’t do that anymore that’s why I feel he is hurting the team more than helping the team.

And to robloosli, with the potential that the cardinals have they could get back to the super bowl this year.

by js10jj on Nov 6, 2009 12:04 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Finally we agree on something

The Cardinals absolutely have the potential to make it to the Super Bowl again this year. And I would like nothing more than to spend another long weekend in Florida in February, just like I did last year (PA is awfully cold in February).

My main point behind all of this is that the Cardinals coaches feel that Warner gives us the best chance at realizing that potential, and I agree with them. I know you disagree with them. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and ours happen to differ.

One terrible game from Warner isn’t enough to get me to change my mind, and Leinart has shown nothing to make me believe that he gives the Cards a better chance at getting back to the Super Bowl than Warner.

Also, as far as I know, the only way to get to the Super Bowl is to make it to the playoffs and win some games. If the season ended today, we’d have that chance. With Kurt Warner at QB.

by robloosli on Nov 6, 2009 12:18 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

But the season doesn't end today

And that’s my main point it hasn’t just been one game, the san fran game, the indy game all descent teams that know how to play defense will shut down Warner this year. Maybe not last year, but this year they will. It just sucks for the cardinals and leinart that they will be content with whatever happens this year happens. And what I don’t want to happen is next year they give Leinart the job and key players leave the team on both sides of the ball – and then if the Cardinals don’t win – it’s because Leinart sucks.

by js10jj on Nov 6, 2009 1:03 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Which brings me to my last point

The season is NOT over today, however, through almost half of the season our team sits in 1st place, with the 3rd easiest schedule in the NFC through the end of the season (opponent’s record wise). I’m sorry js10jj, but we’re just going to have to disagree on this one, because there’s nothing to fix right now. 1st place is 1st place. Until we’re no longer in 1st place, coaches shouldn’t be trying to fix something that isn’t broken.

by robloosli on Nov 6, 2009 3:05 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

The fist goal has always got to be win the division. We may need to tweek some things, but the parts are still in place.

by Drullin'OverDaCards on Nov 6, 2009 3:18 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

?

What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds

by Andrew602 on Nov 6, 2009 2:09 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

benching warner

You think you have trouble now put leinart in and you will have something to talk about for the week Warner is a proven Winner

by old school poke fan on Nov 7, 2009 4:48 AM MST reply actions   0 recs

Welcome to ROTB

What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds

by Andrew602 on Nov 7, 2009 3:49 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Check out the big brain on js10jj

Arizona Comp Att Yds Pct Y/A Sack YdsL TD Int Rating
 K. Warner 22 32 261 68.8 8.2 1 5 5 0 132.9
 M. Leinart 0 1 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 1 0.0

… I take it Matt should have stayed in the game in your opinion?

by quid pro quo on Nov 8, 2009 2:47 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

One bad game and you even consider benching the guy who led this team to the superbowl? Sigh @ knee jerk reactions. After todays game, alot of people just ate crow in this thread, and it puts a big smile on my face.

Go cards..

by squeeb on Nov 8, 2009 3:48 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

It was mainly js10jj that ate crow.

Everyone else was defending Warner.

by Pyromnc on Nov 8, 2009 4:41 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I think

The conversation died because all but 1 person on this thread was right in their assessment that Warner gives us the best opportunity to win this season…

Hey js10jj, anything to add to the topic?

by robloosli on Nov 9, 2009 4:44 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

It's pretty crazy

Warner had one of his best games, throwing 5 touchdowns and Leinart came in and threw 1 pass, which was a pick. I think js10jj went into hiding after this. He hasn’t logged in since Nov 6, probably so he didn’t have to read any of the comments lol

What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds

by Andrew602 on Nov 10, 2009 9:00 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Kinda like HardHat only pops out when Matty has a bad game?

Lifelong Arizona Cardinals/Chicago Bears fan.

No band-wagoner fans allowed, pick a team and stick with em, throughout the good and the bad.

by JoeCB1991 on Nov 13, 2009 10:32 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Welcome to ROTB squeeb and GraydonS

And like Pyro said, most of us were defending Warner.

What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds

by Andrew602 on Nov 8, 2009 6:12 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Hindsight is always 20/20, however

I think Warner just put this argument to rest. Let’s try to avoid any more panic fire in the near future.

by Long Beach on Nov 9, 2009 9:49 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

Seriously right?

What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds

by Andrew602 on Nov 10, 2009 8:58 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

BIG DEAL!

So Warner played good against a depleted high school secondary! WOW! That’s exactly what Warner can still do, he’s done playing good against a real defense. So when he has the opportunity to beat a team playing bad he does a good job at that. The annoying thing with you guys is that if Warner would played the way he has playing all season, yesterday everyone would’ve say we need to put Leinart in, but since he had one good game against a horrible defense – everyone starts saying “and I was the one sticking behind Warner and we were defending Warner” really you guys are a joke. Guarantee you would’ve wanted to pull Warner if they would of got beat by the Bears.

But you’ll stay all over Warner’s jock for a few more weeks because they don’t play anyone till Minnesota and then when they play a real team with a real experienced proven WINNER and defense- then you’ll see what a older, more productive QB looks like. Can you imagine Favre with Warner receiving core? Even with him at 40 no one would every stop him. What do you think Jaren Allen is going to do to Warner? Hmmmm. I’m guessing if he sacked Aaron Rodgers about 4 or 5 times that’s like 8 in Warner football. So you guys can hold your head up high after this win and think that your all right, but I know that when Warner faces a real team he will blow the game with a interception or get sacked on the last play of the game like he always does – remember San Fran, and who could forget the Super Bowl when he couldn’t even throw the ball up to Fitz in the end zone to give him a chance at making a play). So we’ll see.

And I’m not leaving because Warner will fall apart this season or get hurt and when he does and Matt comes in, guess who you’ll all be defending all of a sudden!

by js10jj on Nov 10, 2009 9:33 AM MST reply actions   0 recs

I am pretty sure Leinart would have bad outings just like Warner does.

Maybe not 6 turnovers bad but not every QB is perfect. You gonna say bench Leinart too when that happens?

by Pyromnc on Nov 10, 2009 10:15 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Bouncing Back?

Bouncing back against a horrible team isn’t necessarily bouncing back. I wish they would of played a good team week so all you guys wouldn’t have this stupid concept of him having one bad game and then bouncing back. What if he has two bad games in a roll, just leave him in – He’ll bounce back! So Warner does no wrong, huh? Well I guess it’s not his fault that he can’t move. My point exactly about Jared Allen and the last play of the Super Bowl, doesn’t it frustrate you as a fan, cause I sure know it does as a coach – when a QB cannot even elude one defensive player ever. Normally, when there is a last play of the game most teams will play a deep prevent even with there backers falling back – but do teams do that against Warner? Heck no, they bring it, because they know he can’t buy any time and even side step a defender and he’ll have to use that great quick release of his and get rid of it quick or get sacked – and this is exactly what the defense wants a quick throw on the last play of the game or a sack – and as long as Warner is the QB that’s exactly what will happen. So what kind of burden does it put on the offensive line to know that they have to block perfect every game, every play, because if one guy gets in, it’s a sack. And I think you guys are going to need professional help when Warner is gone, because you can’t take any criticism about your great, old QB.

by js10jj on Nov 10, 2009 11:40 AM MST reply actions   0 recs

the only response to this guy should be

Don’t feed the troll!!!

He’ll go away eventually if we just ignore him.

Be careful....to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

by Bezekira on Nov 10, 2009 12:12 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Bezekira

Don’t be mad because I’m speaking the truth, why can’t you give me any answers why I’m wrong. Instead of saying dumb comments like don’t feed the troll, why don’t you man up and speak on it. Is this blog only to speak on everything positive about the Arizona Cardinals and when someone says something opposed to what your saying, you call them a troll. Grow up! And earlier today everyone saying where I went and now you don’t want them to respond to me. I won’t go away because I told people I wouldn’t.

And for Long Beach, I did coach, I’ve played QB my whole life and have coached QB’s ever since I started coaching 20 years ago. I’ve coached at many D1’s throughout my career, including USC, Purdue, and then retiring from Georgia Tech, and now being retired I still will help out some local high schools.

Andrew602, the quick release was sarcasm – all everyone on this blog talks about his how quick his release is. Doesn’t everyone understand his release has to be quick, because if he takes any longer he’ll get sacked or hit. So let me get this straight, you would rather have a QB that can’t even side step a defender than a QB like Rothlisberger that can make plays at the end of the game unlike Warner, hmmmm? That’s where your thinking is really off. I can’t believe that you would say that. And every QB that’s pressured in the league plays like crap are you kidding, your ridiculous. Have you ever played or even watched football? Both Mannings, McNabb, Brees, Brady, Rothlisberger and the list goes on our all the elite QB’s in the NFL, yeah they just buckle down under pressure throw picks and never produce and don’t win games. That really is the most idiotic statement I have ever heard! Great QB’s produce under pressure that’s why their in those situations to make plays, big time players make big time plays in big time games! Or should we just pressure every QB in the NFL and they will just play like crap? Man, I wonder why defenses in the NFL haven’t figured that out? What are you a defensive guru? Why are you not calling a defense in the NFL? Oh wait, I think you would know how to stop Warner though – PRESSURE!

by js10jj on Nov 10, 2009 2:53 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Please elaborate

What were your job titles at USC, Purdue, and Georgia Tech?

by Long Beach on Nov 10, 2009 2:59 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm talking about defensive pressure

As in bringing extra defenders to blitz the quarterback, not pressure for big games. Obviously good quarterbacks don’t fold under pressure. But if you can force the quarterback out of the pocket or knock them down/sack them, then their stats will significantly decrease. And like you said, his release has to be quick, because he’ll get sacked or hit, which comes down to his poor offensive line protection. I’ll admit that Warner can hold the ball too long at times, but since he’s been in Arizona that hasn’t been a problem. I’d rather have a quarterback that get’s rid of the ball and not take hits. Roethisberger get’s sacked way too much, and a lot more then Warner ever does.

What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds

by Andrew602 on Nov 10, 2009 3:44 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Kind of fun to see how far it goes.

by Long Beach on Nov 10, 2009 5:01 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Be careful....to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

by Bezekira on Nov 16, 2009 6:36 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Out of curiosity, where

do you coach? I can’t imagine any coach having your take on Warner. You don’t need to be a running threat when, as you pointed out, you have a “great quick release.” It’s easier to block for a QB that you know stays in one spot than it is to block for someone who bails out on a regular basis.

by Long Beach on Nov 10, 2009 12:46 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Wait a minute

So you’re saying that a offensive line has a harder time blocking for a quarterback with a quick release then blocking for a quarterback who can side step occasionally? So Ben Roethlisberger, who can buy time better then any quarterback in the league with “side steps”, shouldn’t get sacked a lot right? Yet he’s been sacked more then any quarterback in the last 4-5 years. Interesting theory you got there.

And bad games are just part of the sport. They happen and every player experiences them. Larry Fitzgerald had a couple slow games and dropped balls early in the season. So were you thinking we should’ve benched Fitzgerald? I don’t understand. What does Warner have to do? Throw 10 touchdowns? The Bears aren’t great but they’re certainly not the Rams, Lions, Chiefs, or Buccaneers. As far as bringing added pressure, well any quarterback in the league plays like crap if they’re pressured or sacked a lot. You’re thinking is off.

What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds

by Andrew602 on Nov 10, 2009 2:04 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

If you really coached

at USC, that explains your favoritism towards Leinart. When did you coach there? I find it hard to believe that a coach as experienced as claim to be would have a major problem with Warner. Is he the best QB to ever play the game? NO chance, but he is a darn good one, and still is capable of playing with the best of them. Here are each game’s stats for the year for Warner:
vs SF(ranked 24th in NFL against pass, avg 241/game allowed): 26/44 288 1TD/2INT 3 sack
@ Jax(ranked 26th, 242/game): 24/26 243 2td/0int 0 sack
vs IND: 30/52 332 1TD/2INT 4 sack
vs Hou(18th, 223/game): 26/38 302 2TD/0int 1 sack
@ Sea(17th, 219/game): 32/41 276 2TD/1int(hailmary at half) 2 sack
@ NYG: 20/36 231 1/1 2 sack
vs CAR: 27/46 242 2/5 2 sack
@Chi(12th, 206/game): 22/32 261 5/0 1 sack

If you look through this season’s game, he has been better than average in yards vs every team the Cards have played.
15 sacks taken are 8th fewest in the league.
2nd in the league for TDs
4th MOST INTs, I agree, he could be better here, but 5 in one game throws this number off.
9th in passing yards
9th in completion %
15th in Rating

Overall, Kurt Warner’s numbers aren’t really all that bad this year, especially considering they have come against 4 of the top 12 defenses in the NFL against the pass, and only 2 defenses that aren’t in the top 18. Top 10 in the NFL in most of his statistics. I’ll take that anytime.

by robloosli on Nov 10, 2009 3:58 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

follow up

IND is ranked 9th, allowing 195/game
NYG are ranked 3rd, allowing 168/game
Car is ranked 6th, allowing 181/game.

by robloosli on Nov 10, 2009 4:00 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh

and all stats are taken from NFL.com

by robloosli on Nov 10, 2009 4:03 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

warner

hes a great quarter back and has done great, all any passer needs is a strong line, give warner that consistently and he will eat you up. as far as im concerned the rams blew it .

by bill b on Nov 11, 2009 5:31 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

Against good defenses!

Look what he has done against the good defenses according to your NFL.com stats. Against San Fran, Indy, and Carolina – 4td’s, 9 int’s and 9 sacks and 2 lost fumbles(and takeaway 2 of the int’s because I know that everyone is going to say that they weren’t his fault – so big deal now he has 7). So I’m glad that you guys are so happy that he plays good against the crappy teams, cause he sure buckles down against the pressure when he plays the good teams. And what kind of teams do you play in the playoffs, not STL, SEA, or CHI, too bad for Warner. And those are your NFL.com stats!

by js10jj on Nov 12, 2009 9:51 AM MST reply actions   0 recs

were all adults here ... right?!?

Don’t call people names if you don’t want to hear what a douche bag you are … thats kinda how blogs work

ok, so … you’re still on Leinart … Matt has a few major problems that, in training camp had him fighting for the backup spot. #1 he still doesn’t know the playbook, and he struggles to read coverages and defensive formations. Whiz blasted him at the beginning of training camp for not being more prepared, he was 3qb in the second preseason game. #2 pocket presence / he doesn’t move well. Hey, I won’t say that he’s less mobile than Warner, but Matt is still slow as molasses and he doesn’t feel the rush from the back side. #3 His slow release. Matts throwing motion is a little like Byron Leftwich, he brings the ball down below his hip in a long throwing motion before his release. He has tried to speed it up, but his quick outs look like wounded ducks. And if we go deep by the time Matts is done telegraphing the play and out of his throwing motion the safety is all over guys like Boldin and Fitz.

Admittedly, Matt will only get better, and would be better if he played more and got more snaps in games and practice. But the NFL stands for N.ot F.or L.ong if you don’t win, and Whiz knows this. Warner is much better at reading the coverages, defenses, and blitz packages, along with his quick release and tight accurate spirals (most days). You live with the finite career, and you focus on the next game, because EVERY week is tough in the NFL.

If Matt did go to another team it might be the best thing for him. Ya just never know, as they say, sometimes the change of scenery does a guy allot of good. Let me ask you this, do you think he holds any trade value? (regardless, I bet the Cards draft a QB next year)

by quid pro quo on Nov 13, 2009 2:59 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm just going to sit back

Because we have a bet on.

I hope you haven’t forgotten yet. Above league average = HOF acceptance speech from you.

The numbers are looking pretty good for me right now.

by bcloirao on Nov 15, 2009 8:24 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

Yea, Warner has looked great.

7 touchdowns, 601 passing yards, 126.7 QB Rating, and 72.6 completion percentage.

I think Matt Leinart can be a good QB but there is no way he throws up those numbers in those these games right now.

by Pyromnc on Nov 15, 2009 8:59 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Lifelong Arizona Cardinals/Chicago Bears fan.

No band-wagoner fans allowed, pick a team and stick with em, throughout the good and the bad.

by JoeCB1991 on Nov 16, 2009 1:31 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Wow, why didn't I read this little gem earlier. It's the Ant-HardHat.

We all leave footprints in the sands of time, just watch out for the discarded fish hooks!

by Hawkwind on Nov 16, 2009 1:00 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

It's been quite popular

What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds

by Andrew602 on Nov 16, 2009 3:08 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I'll just sit back and relax!

Because I can’t wait for the fall of Warner. And quid pro quo, your way off and you do not know how to evaluate a QB at all. Matt does not throw from his hip at all, your a joke and the out is one of his strongest attributes, when in doubt just run an out! And he’ll complete because he has great anticipation and timing. Warner has a quick release but his slowness really outweights any of his strengths now. I’m calling them losing to St. Louis his old team, they were getting whipped by Seattle at one point that’s ridiculous! I can’t wait till everyone is all on Matt’s jock next year, after old man Warner finally loses a hip. Whiz might of said something right at the beginning of training camp about Matt, but after the Green Bay game during the preseason this year he clearly stated that Matt was ready. And one might say well it’s the preseason, well it was the same defense that Warner was playing against and couldn’t do anything against. Matt came in when they were losing 38-7 and the final was 44-37. And they would of won 39-37 if Doucet would of caught that gift wrapped fade that Matt threw him, instead they kicked an onside and they ran it back. So after that game everyone knew that Matt was ready – 346 yards and 3 touchdowns in one half. You’ll never see an average QB in the NFL do that, even in a preseason game. He’s going to be great and if you want to trade him, the cardinals will be just like the Chargers with Drew Brees – so go ahead and trade him and see what happens. It’s your lost! Not Matt’s, he could start on many NFL teams right now, but he knows that when his chance comes (which will be soon, cause the old man can go down on any play you know that) he’ll ready because he wants his chance to throw to the best receiving core in the NFL only if the defense can hold up next year – they’ll have another chance for a run to the super bowl not just win the division and get smashed in the playoffs! And your Not For Long saying is great for Warner, because it won’t be long before he is watching Matt tear up the league! Mark my words.

And like I said before what has Warner done against good defenses? You talk about his stats for his last two games against two crappy teams! A good college QB could put up good numbers on those defenses! I wouldn’t be to happy about those games. Read my above posting about defenses (good defenses).

by js10jj on Nov 19, 2009 1:02 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

Hope you have a comfortable chair

If you’re basing all of your Leinart man crush on a preseason game against 3rd and 4th stringers I think you’re going to be in for a big disappointment some day.

By the way, several people have asked, but you have yet to answer, when and where did you coach at the D1 level. You are very quick to point out your “coaching” experience, but are even quicker to duck the questions about it. If you have such a great coaching history, why won’t you tell us who you are and let us verify your experience and ability to rate QBs in the NFL.

We all bleed Cardinal Red, but most of us don't recognize it!

by robloosli on Nov 19, 2009 5:13 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I do have a comfortable chair!!

And I’m not ducking any questions I just don’t want any of my personal information out on this blog with a bunch of guys that just know how to speculate, and have never coached or played a day in their lives. This is just a hobby of mine to talk football when I get a chance, it’s not my life like some people. Just put it this way Matty and I go way back to his high school years and up to his undefeated year against Oklahoma, and I know what he’s capable of – “Stay up 7, your time will come, and I know you’ll be ready!” And why are you ducking my question of what happens when Warner faces a good defense that they will face in the playoffs, not a crappy non-playoff team?

by js10jj on Nov 20, 2009 10:08 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

So far this season

The Cardinals have faced exactly 1 team that is going to be in the playoffs, and that’s the Colts. Warner threw for over 300 yards, 1 TD and 2 INTs. Was it a great game? No, but the Colts are also probably the best team in the league at this point.

The only other team the Cards have played that is in position to make a run at the playoffs is the Giants, and Warner threw for 231, 1 TD and 1 INT.

So to recap, 1-1 against potential playoff teams, 563 yards, 3 tds and 3 INTs. The Cardinals don’t get to pick their schedule.

At this point, your argument loses it’s merit with the fact that the Cards are in 1st place in their division, 3rd in their conference, and Warner is in the top 10 in pretty much every relevant stat a QB can have.

I hope Leinart turns out to be a great QB for the Cards, but almost everyone agrees that he won’t get that chance until Warner is no longer the best option the team has. Right now the best option the team has is Warner, and as long as that’s the case, he should and will remain the starter.

We all bleed Cardinal Red, but most of us don't recognize it!

by robloosli on Nov 20, 2009 11:14 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

1 team

So the one team that is a playoff team that he faces – the cardinals get smashed he has 1td, 2 ints and you feel comfortable with this. I don’t even know why you would point this out, it’s exactly what I’m talking about. STL, and SEA played the colts tougher than that, but hey were in 1st place, we have nothing to worry about. I’m guessing Warner does great tomorrow vs. the Rams! LOL.

by js10jj on Nov 21, 2009 11:56 AM MST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

Warner didn't fumble the ball away at the 5 yard line

whenthe Cards had the chance to go up 10-0, and Warner doesn’t play defense when the Cards couldn’t stop Peyton Manning.

We all bleed Cardinal Red, but most of us don't recognize it!

by robloosli on Nov 21, 2009 12:25 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

As long as Warner is the Starter.......

THE CARDINALS WILL NEVER WILL A SUPER BOWL!!! RIGHT THAT DOWN OR ARGUE THAT!

by js10jj on Nov 20, 2009 12:27 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

I'm guessing you meant WIN not WILL...

Ok, so my question is Warner a failure if they go the super bowl and lose?

by GraydonS on Nov 20, 2009 1:20 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Let me rephrase...

Is it going to take another Super Bowl win out of Warner for him not to suck?

by GraydonS on Nov 20, 2009 1:26 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes I meant win instead of will

And I don’t care whether he is considered a winner or loser. I’m worried about the team this year and if we try to stick with him next then that’s two years we don’t have a shot at the super bowl. I could careless what people think about him after he’s done.

by js10jj on Nov 20, 2009 6:03 PM MST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

No team can win the Super Bowl

without first making it to the playoffs. Kurt Warner led the Cardinals to the playoffs last year, and he is well on his way to leading them to the playoffs again this year. Once the playoffs start, it’s anyone’s ball game.

Say what you want js10jj, but fact is and will remain that the team doesn’t believe Leinart gives them a better chance to win in the playoffs than Warner does. And throwing for a bunch of yards in a pre-season game against 3rd and 4th stringers doesn’t give Leinart any credibility.

We all bleed Cardinal Red, but most of us don't recognize it!

by robloosli on Nov 21, 2009 12:25 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

You mean...

The same 3rd and 4th stringers that Warner couldn’t even get a 1st down against.

by js10jj on Nov 21, 2009 1:38 PM MST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

One more thing....

Throwing for a bunch of yards against horrible teams in the NFL doesn’t give Warner any credibility either! And you or me could probably lead the cardinals to the best record/playoffs in the weakest division in football. No credibility there either. And that’s the truth!

by js10jj on Nov 21, 2009 1:42 PM MST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

This will be my last comment on this thread

I tell my employees all the time that you can’t rationalize with irrational people. You my friend, are irrational, and I’m wasting my time trying to rationalize with you.

You have one opinion, the rest of us have another. As far as i’m concerned, this conversation is over. Like it or not, we’ll just have to let the Cardinals staff determine who is the better QB right now, and see what happens when the playoffs roll around.

We all bleed Cardinal Red, but most of us don't recognize it!

by robloosli on Nov 21, 2009 2:34 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

Oh ok...

And your not irrational? Yeah right, more like unexperieced at this kind of stuff so I get it. And Warner is doing great today! Against another 1-8 team! Lol

by js10jj on Nov 22, 2009 3:46 PM MST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

There have been 26 different winning quarterbacks in the 41 Super Bowls thus far. Here’s the list (with the number they have won)………

Terry Bradshaw (4)
Joe Montana (4)
Troy Aikman (3)
Tom Brady (3)
Bob Griese (2)
Roger Staubach (2)
Jim Plunkett (2)
John Elway (2)
Ben Roethlisberger (2)
Joe Namath (1)
Len Dawson (1)
Johnny Unitas (1)
Ken Stabler (1)
Joe Theisman (1)
Jim McMahon (1)
Phil Simms (1)
Doug Williams (1)
Jeff Hostetler (1)
Mark Rypien (1)
Steve Young (1)
Brett Favre (1)
Kurt Warner (1)
Trent Dilfer (1)
Brad Johnson (1)
Peyton Manning (1)
Eli Manning (1)

pretty exclusive club, if your name isn’t on the list, I don’t think you can be critical of anyone who is.

by TBru on Nov 23, 2009 11:28 AM MST reply actions   0 recs

Really don't think there is an arguement to be made anymore.

Comparing last season to this season through week 11 Warner has:

The same amount of touchdowns, 20

2 more turnovers this season, should be one more but a fumble was credited to him rather than Beanie

About 400 less passing yards

Similar completion percentage at 67.5

A similar QB rating a 94.4

and oh yea, the same 7-3 win loss record.

by Pyromnc on Nov 23, 2009 2:10 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

Does Matt call the plays

That was such sissy play calling in that game. And in case you forgot Matt doesn’t call the plays. They were basically trying to lose that game. Third and 9 and running the ball, I’ll tell you what I’m a little more scared of Warner throwing the ball down the field late in the game, he has a rep for throwing picks at the worst time. And Matt has yet to show that characteristic of his game. The one third and long they let him throw he completed a 20 yard pass to Fitz for a first down under a lot of pressure and to a big hit (and didn’t have to come out of the game – lol). So if they needed to get aggressive and throw the ball, I have confidence that the ball would be thrown pretty accurate – if they catch it that’s another thing. But he’ll be ready, mark my words Andrew602, when your all over his jock talking about how good Matt is. But I know you just out of spite you’ll never say anything good about Matt. When he’s he future whether you like it or not!

by js10jj on Nov 23, 2009 4:58 PM MST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

When have I stated anything bad about Leinart? Or actually, when has anybody on this thread said anything bad about him?

Since you went off on Warner he’s yet to throw a pick, whether it’s a good defense or not. You can talk all you want but if you or I go under center we’d get killed. It does take talent to play in the NFL. Funny thing, you say that Warner throws picks at the worst time but when Leinart came in against the Bears he threw a pick. Or let me guess, that was Fitzgerald’s fault? haha. And yes you are right, Matt doesn’t call the plays, but he did throw the ball 14 times. Are you telling me that Ken Whisenhunt forced him to throw every pass in the flats and overthrow Fitzgerald twice? You’re whole arguement has been squashed the last three weeks.

What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds

by Andrew602 on Nov 24, 2009 3:46 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Few dislike Matt on this blog.

Before you criticize and label us, go back and read some of the comments on Matt. Most of us think he could be the future at QB. But in a win now mode we need to do just that, win now. Kurt gives us the best shot at that. If this were a rebuilding process or we had won the SB last year, Kurt probably would not have come back and Matt would definitely have been the starting QB. Like I tell my kids, don’t pick sides in an argument, until you know both sides in an argument. You’re assuming we don’t like Matt cause we don’t deel he is our best option to win. Truth is, he probably isn’t, YET. Just give him some time to continue learning from the better QB then we will gim him his just desserts. Until then get back to practice cause we might need you to play this weekend Matt, I mean js10jj.

Life's too short. Be a fan. Orlando Magic, Arizona Cardinals,Tampa Bay Rays and of course "the U"! What a winning combo.

by hevchv on Nov 27, 2009 3:35 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

What is wrong with our offense this season? Fitz, Boldin, and Breaston are not nearly as effective as they were last season. It just feels like the offense has been riding the defense most of the season, not lately though.

by BakedPigeon on Nov 24, 2009 1:54 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

If you ask js10jj...

its because Kurt is not Matt.

Life's too short. Be a fan. Orlando Magic, Arizona Cardinals,Tampa Bay Rays and of course "the U"! What a winning combo.

by hevchv on Nov 27, 2009 3:28 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Covering the NFC West Champion Arizona Cardinals 24/7.
Start posting about the Cardinals »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Boldin?
7-eleven_iraq_small
Good For, Bad For...
Chrishanburgerlegends_small
Canton's Voters Once Again Prove They Know Nothing About Football
20450_708450133197_10615019_40859276_4024284_n_small
Warner wins 2010 Bart Starr Award
Arizonacardinals_small
2010-11 Standout Player
Arizona_cardinals-11696_small
Miami RB coach to Arizona Cardinals
Tristin_028_small
Love and hate for the former Cardinal
Articlelarge_small
Hi Cardinal fans looking for participation.
Vacations_040_small
Boldin for Wilfork?
Cardinal500_small
Julius Peppers

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Niners Nation
Golden Nuggets: I promise
Acme Packing Company
Replay: Tracy Porter's Super Bowl INT Return
Revenge Of The Birds
Arizona Cardinals Weekly Flock

Contact ROTB

Here at RotB we're always looking for new contributors or anyone just willing to give their feedback. If you'd like to become a contributor, create your own weekly segments, or just have a question or concern, contact us at revengeofthebirds@gmail.com.


Head Coach

Andrew602_avatar_small Andrew602

Coordinators

100_0035_small Hawkwind

Assistant Coaches

Cardsstadium_small CardsFan08

Cards_small Pyromnc

24306182067arizona_cardinals_1_small najmsh

Obx_small Undrafteds

Untitled3_small SundayBlitz