Arizona Cardinals Hang the Help Wanted Sign: A Look at Veteran Running Backs
The Arizona Cardinals running game struggled to say the least in 2008 and they finished the regular season as the worst unit in the entire NFL. To worsen matters they've allowed their third string and change of pace back to leave via free agency with the expectation to release their on-again-off-again starter Edgerrin James at any time. With two holes on the depth chart and the only remaining back, Tim Hightower entering his second season, it's unlikely that the Redbirds will wait until the draft to address the need at running back. That leaves them scouring the free agent market for a veteran back who can replace Edge's production while receiving a considerably lower salary. Luckily for the Cardinals there have been a handful of veteran running backs to hit the free agent market this off season and there are still several noticeable names on the market. Are they worth bringing in and do they have anything left in the tank?
We take a look after the jump.....
(Backs listed alphabetically)
Bell is the youngest option on the list but that doesn't mean he's necessarily the best option. One thing working in his favor is his production though as he's averaged 4.9 yards per carry during his five year career and last season he averaged a career best 5.7 yards per carry. Of course he was selling cell phones at the mall before the Broncos called him. So why is he still unsigned and why did the Broncos sign three other running backs instead of bringing him back?
Bell has some off the field issues and most think he's vastly underachieved given his abilities (which tells you something about his physical talent). While Bell might have the most upside of any of these backs, he's also the most unpredictable. He'll likely come very cheap, considering that he was out of football until Denver called midway through the season, but there's also no guarantee that he'll come motivated or in-shape. He also wouldn't offer anything to Hightower in terms of a mentor, but his slash and dash running style would be nice compliment and he's a decent receiver out of the backfield.
Bottom Line: Plenty of upside but some risk involved and his contributions will be limited to between the stripes.
Dunn is the eldest of the current free agent backs, but that hasn't stopped him from remaining productive. His 2008 campaign was his most efficient since 2005 he's totaled over 1,000 combined yards (rushing and receiving) in every single season of his 13 year career. He's also a high quality individual who would be a valuable asset in the locker room and despite being questioned about his lack for size for most of his career, he's missed just 11 games in 13 seasons. The only question with Dunn is how much does he have left in the tank?
Most will say that Dunn has lost a step and isn't a starter anymore and they're probably right, but he could still fill a role for the Cardinals. Dunn has always been tough to bring down and a much tougher runner than his diminutive size would suggest. He's at his best when in space and could still be threat out of the backfield. Dunn could fill the void left by Arrington and is one of the most respected veterans in the league. He'd be a solid locker room presence and there isn't a better back for Hightower to learn from.
Bottom Line: Sign Dunn and you get a guy who can still play and half a coach.
We've looked at the youngest and oldest and now Deuce represents the guy with the most question marks. He's undoubtedly a power back who was capable of being a workhorse, but at this point in his career his knees could put him on the brink of retirement. He's torn both ACL (right knee in 2005 and left knee in 2007) and he hasn't played a full season since 2003. McAllister wouldn't be the change of pace back that Bell or Dunn would provide, but his running style is similar to Hightower which could help develop the promising youngster. The question remains though, can his knees hold up for another season?
When I think of Deuce I picture that catcher from the movie Major League (Jake something or other), you know when he's on the plane icing his knees after each game. The good news is that Deuce might have a couple more years in those legs if he can play a limited role, which the Cardinals would probably prefer. If he's asked to start or become a workhorse back though, it could end up being a massive failure. Just three times in 2008 did he carry the ball more than 10 times in a game and each time he was unproductive in the following game.
Bottom Line: Injuries are a huge concern but at the right price and limited role he could be very productive.
Now before you completely dismiss Rhodes as a spare or career nobody, consider that he's a career backup who wouldn't carry much of a cap hit. He's also an accomplished receiver out of the backfield (45 receptions last year) and has plenty of experience protecting an immobile quarterback. He's only started 33 games in nine seasons so he won't be whining about playing time or lack of touches. He's a role player who doesn't hurt his team's chances of winning.
Bottom Line: He's not a sexy name but there's very little risk in signing him.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Now it's your turn so put on your Rod Graves mask and step into the GM's office. Who would you sign and what would your offer be? Any other guys your interested in that we didn't mention (ie Ahman Green, Rudi Johnson, Ron Dayne)?
36 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Choice 1)Rhodes 2) Dunn
He didn’t do himself any favors during his year with the Raiders, but he’s worked very well behind Peyton, and has been a great help to the Colts running game when Addai was down for a few weeks this year. I think Rhodes has a lot of game left in him and would be a great compliment.
Dunn is quality, but I’m afraid he would cost more than Rhodes for only slightly more upside. He came from a powerful running game, so that could either help improve the Cards through his experience, or limit his contributions due to the lack of power in the Cards OL.
Dunn would fit better
I think what we are looking for is the guy who will replace JJ as the change of pace third down guy… I am expecting the Cardinals to draft a RB in the first or second round, to be the starter, then Hightower as the short yardage specialist, and then one of these guys as the third down guy… for that role I like both Rhodes and Dunn, but feel Dunn’s skill set is a better fit for that role, and he would be a great mentor for the young running backs (of course for the right price)… one other name that hasn’t been mentioned is DeShaun Foster, I don’t know much about him, but he was productive for the Panthers not too long ago, and was a speed guy…
paco cabrera
lost his step and his game in the second half of '07
Never do card tricks for the group you play poker with.
yea his one year in SF didn't help his market value though
A team could probably get him for the veteran minimum.
Rhodes would be the obvious choice.
The Cardinals usually sign the low key names in free agency.
Hey, hey, hey hey hey, watch the language, ok? I have a family.
Revenge of the Birds
would you keep Edge then or do you have another FA in mind
Or are you drafting two RBs to fill out the depth chart?
270 votes and counting but just 10 comments
Anyone who reads can vote so alot of people are just picking the biggest name without actually reading, much less thinking.
Apparently the ones who talk the most...
don’t know what their talking about. :-)
I voted for Rhodes too.
by AJ BirdWatcher on Mar 12, 2009 7:21 AM MDT up reply actions
I gotta ask
Are all the Rhodes supporters picking him because he’d probably be the cheapest option and could still have another two or three seasons while Dunn or McAllister are probably just one year stop gaps? Or do you think Rhodes actually brings more to the table?
Rhodes
I guess when I considered Dunn’s age and McAllister’s knees, I felt Rhodes would give us a little more bang for the buck, and like Hawk said he’s lower risk financially. I thought Rhodes filled in well for Addai last season, and would be an adequate compliment to Hightower and whichever back we take in the draft.
by AJ BirdWatcher on Mar 12, 2009 9:41 AM MDT up reply actions
It cracks me up how many of you treat the "real NFL" much more like "Madden 09"...
You guys are always talking about age, age, age but there is nothing wrong with bringing in a guy who still has game to contribute over another guy simply because he’s a bit older. There are no extra points taken away in “off season progression” in real life, get with it. Rhodes has never, and will never be the back Dunn is even at 34 years old! Dunn has been a machine and also a presence in the locker room which is far more than Rhodes has ever done. Tiki rushed for well over a thousand when he was 33 years old and had enough left for another season but wanted to go out on top. It’s not like we’d be asking Dunn to rush for 30 times a game either rather than spell T. Hightower and our new draft pick when needed.
Now with that said, I don’t necessarily think Dunn is the best option, just don’t sell him short because his age, base it on his performance. I think we keep Edge until we have at least two other quality backs from the draft and at least one Vet. going into the pre-season. Let them battle it out and see how it shapes up on the depth chart. I’d rather see Shipp come back over Rhodes on the real!
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
Point taken
although I should let it be known that I don’t play Madden…or any other video games for that matter
by AJ BirdWatcher on Mar 12, 2009 11:13 AM MDT up reply actions
Wasn't a knock on you in particular man I have seen a bunch of people using this logic...
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
Apologies if it came across that way.
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
My reasoning as well.
Rhodes filled in very well for Addai and I think he’s got two or three years left in him. I think McAllisters knees won’t give him that longevity. And with Dunn, I really like Dunn, but I just like Rhodes over Dunn. Not the age thing (read Boogatt’s comment), it’s the just the game that he comes from and the realization that the Cardinals probably won’t be that kind of offense.
My pick is for Dunn
He’d be a great influence on Hightower and he’d be the best option on third downs. Not to mention that him and KW on the same team might just be charitable enough to save the world.
Dunn is a class-act
Him paired up with Warner would be crazy for Cardinals’ charities.
We all leave footprints in the sands of time, just watch out for the discarded fish hooks!
They could start a "School for Children who can't Read Well and Stuff..."
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
Rhodes
Love your thinking boog but i am still for Rhodes. I like the fact that he doesnt ever seem to get hurt and that he is very consistent. Maybe I missed it but when he did play last year I didnt see much consistency. This could be because i didnt see much of him but I still vote for Rhodes, always liked him even when he was behind Edge in Indy
Never do card tricks for the group you play poker with.
In fact, where is Shipp?
He’s not even list on nfl.com but I would still like to see him in Cardinal red next year.
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
yea he went to the Texans camp but was cut
He was out of the league last year but maybe he’ll get a camp invite somewhere.
WOW
I didnt know that. Shipp was always one of my favorite players. I still remember hanging the Mesa Tribune sports page featuring Shipp and his first 100 yard rushing game that said “Cardinals Ride the Shipp to Victory”.
Never do card tricks for the group you play poker with.
I still vote for Foster.
Yes he is injury plagued and will probably only be able to give us 5-7 carries a game, and thats all I need from him. Add in 12-15 from Timmy and 10-13 from our draftee and that is, on the high side, 35 carries a game. If we can average at least 3.7 ypc we will get about 130 ypg. That’s not so far fetched with the notion that continued continuity and some slight upgrades to the line could yield major improvements from last year. Even though Kurt is back, we will be transitioning slightly to a more traditional power running game. I only said slightly. Obviously we will continue to do what works with our personale. And now that Whiz is calling the plays again, he will want to be a little more balanced.
I'm fine with 100 Yards/game
Since last year we only hade 73.
Hey, hey, hey hey hey, watch the language, ok? I have a family.
Revenge of the Birds
I'm good with 85 ypg
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
I'll take any YPG...
so long as we can grind it out and salt away the game when needed.
Othewise, let Kurt lite them up like a Xmas tree


















