Arizona Cardinals News: Updating All Things Anquan Boldin Related
News of Anquan Boldin being disgruntled and making waves have died down over the past month, but there's not doubt that it's still a huge issue between the Arizona Cardinals and the player affectionately known as 'Q.' The franchise has maintained that they still want Boldin as part of their current team and part of their future but they don't seem overly willing to extend Boldin, who still has two years remaining on his current contract. Boldin, who was outspoken last off season, at points during the season, and most recently immediately after the Super Bowl, seems to have softened his stance a little bit, but it's obvious that the two sides don't see eye to eye. With that in mind here's the most recent news concerning Boldin and the Cardinals:
- At Kurt Warner's charity flag football game, Boldin said he was "fine" with the current situation and that he was enjoying the off season. He went on saying that the situation was out of his hands so it wasn't something that he was worrying about.
Despite both sides seeming somewhat amicable right now, experts are still spending their time speculating where Boldin would end up if traded and why not. If you type "trade Anquan Boldin" into a Google search you get over 78,000 results in less than a second. There even some experts who are willing to go as far as saying that he will be traded.
- Peter King has been the most outspoken journalist insisting that Boldin will not be a Cardinals by July. He cites the Eagles and Giants as the most likely suitors considering that they're both needing a receiver and they each hold three of the top 60 picks. He says that there's no way that Philly won't at least attempt to pursue a trade.
- John Clayton echos King's thoughts and again names the Eagles and Giants as the most likely landing spots. The Eagles, he points out, have over $40 million in cap room and 12 draft picks. The Giants on the other hand, he suggests, might prefer a player for player trade. He softly throws Osi Umenyiora's name in the discussion as possible trade bait.
- The National Football Post takes a different route though, saying that 31 teams should be interested in Boldin's services and that he's worth all of the money and draft picks that it'll take to pry him away from the Cardinals. The writer, a former safety for the Rams, Packers, Redskins and Bills, describes Boldin as.....
....the last receiver you want to see in the open field with the ball in his hands. Yes, Randy Moss might strike the most fear in NFL players when he lines up before the snap, but once Boldin catches the football, he's the scariest thing on the field.
So what should the Cardinals do with Boldin......
The Cardinals have but three options, pay Boldin, trade Boldin or simply make him play. At this point trying to predict what will happen is pure speculation because no one including Rod Graves or Boldin himself has any idea. I frankly wouldn't be surprised by any of the three outcomes although I think Warner's return reduces the possibility of a trade.
I won't go as far as guaranteeing that he'll be a member of the 2009 Arizona Cardinals but the team seems to be loading up for championship run with Warner at the helm and Boldin is more valuable, in the short term, than two or three extra draft picks. I'd also almost guarantee that if Boldin still a Cardinal on April 27th (day after draft) that he'll be a Cardinal for the 2010 season. Player for player trades are extremely rare and trading him in July for picks in the 2010 draft does nothing to help this current squad.
Whether or not that is true remains to be seen, but what do you think? Will Q be a Cardinal in 2009 or will be call another frachise home? Will he get a new contract this off season?
0 recs |
35 comments
|
Comments
He'll play in Red this season...
and depending on our situation (winning a Super Bowl, whose Quarterbacking for the Cards etc.) next year will determine where he lands. It doesn’t look to me like the Cards are so quick to dismantle the team that had so much success in 2008 and I think it’s a very good thing. We have our same core of players and only look to improve upon that with the signing of McFadden and whatever others we bring in this off-season. Keep the winning formula together and let’s rock this piece until the wheels fall off…
I want a Super Bowl baby!
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
by boogatt66 on Mar 12, 2009 2:22 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I have to agree.
We’ve virtually kept the core together and I think the run through the playoffs will carry over into the 2009 season. I know the Giants won the year before but look how their momentum carried over into ’08.
Hey, hey, hey hey hey, watch the language, ok? I have a family.
Revenge of the Birds
by Andrew602 on Mar 12, 2009 2:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Staying
He’s staying. Simply put, Graves has other priorities (i.e., Dansby, Wilson, draft) in the short term. When it’s Boldin’s turn, he’ll get what he wants. If the Cardinals have the money and don’t spend on it, then….well, I don’t want to go there.
While the thought of getting 3 decent draft picks in return for Boldin is intriguing, he’s key to the heart of this team. I also think trading him to an NFC team is silly. With Warner it’s “win now”, not build for 2011. I’ve seen some argue that investing that much in 2 WRs is unwise…I beg to differ…this is a downright scary offense with or without a top RB…because of Warner to Fitz/Boldin/Breaston. Take care of the pieces you already have and draft wisely…and there will be continued momentum in the desert.
by RedbirdsRule on Mar 12, 2009 2:50 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I heard a massive gong being banged at the end of your rant in my head, +1!
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
by boogatt66 on Mar 12, 2009 2:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
the son of Wolf?
Are you by chance related to Wolfley? The above comment makes me wonder! haha
Never do card tricks for the group you play poker with.
by sc464 on Mar 12, 2009 4:33 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Welcome to ROTB RedbirdsRule.
I agree that we need to keep the best offense in the league together and we can add a RB in the draft.
Hey, hey, hey hey hey, watch the language, ok? I have a family.
Revenge of the Birds
by Andrew602 on Mar 12, 2009 4:21 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
CARDINALS SHOPPING BOLDIN
Don’t know if there is any truth to it but a new article has come up online. Don’t blame me as I just saw it and don’t hold any credibility to this. Wonder who the league source is that knows all about this. Any truth? It seems something big is just waiting to take place with either a new signing or a trade. It is from the profootballtalk website.
Kurt Warner might get to keep his $2 million, after all.
A league source tells us that the Arizona Cardinals are shopping receiver Anquan Boldin to potential trade partners.
Warner recently has suggested that he’d devote a portion of his salary to signing Boldin to a new contract. (We don’t think Warner really means it.)
Boldin, a six-year veteran, is signed through 2010. He has wanted for roughly a year a significant increase from his current range of $2.5 million to $3 million.
With teammate Larry Fitzgerald at $10 million per year, Boldin is believed to want at least $9 million annually.
Boldin previously has requested a trade. At one point after the Super Bowl, Boldin said that he would not sign a new deal with the Cardinals, and that he wanted to be dealt to a new team. More recently, he had softened in his position, expressing a willingness to consider a new long-term contract to stay with the team.
by kj197728 on Mar 12, 2009 5:05 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I'll throw the link out for you:
Here. (pops)
Ryan Perilloux in 2010!!
by Dane Noble on Mar 12, 2009 5:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd take anything on Pro Football talk with a grain of salt
especially something that starts with “according to league sources”
that guy is well known for taking the “throw as much as you can against the wall because something is bound to stick” approach. 99% of his stuff is pure speculation.
by Bezekira on Mar 13, 2009 6:59 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks.
Realized I just forgot to put that link in there.
by kj197728 on Mar 12, 2009 5:22 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I will hold to my opinions...
I would prefer to have Q. He gives us a lot after the catch and blocking in the run game, but with his stock so high, we could get a mountain for him and that would be hard to pass up.
by hevchv on Mar 12, 2009 5:45 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
WHAT DO YOU ALL THINK
if we kept Q with his current contract through next year and then traded him AFTER this upcoming year? That way we can give Warner one more shot at the SB with the same team and then start to tailor the team more towards Leinart by using the picks we get from trading Boldin after the ’09 season. Boldin will claim he was sucker punched but what it comes down to is that HE signed the contract and HE is expected to uphold HIS end of the bargain.
Never do card tricks for the group you play poker with.
by sc464 on Mar 12, 2009 5:52 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Boldin Trade
I would like to see the Cards trade Boldin to Chicago.The trade I would propose would include Boldin,E.James,and Elton Brown for Devin Hester ,Kevin Jones and Daniel Manning also to include swapping positions in the 1and 2 round of the draft this year.This would be a great trade for both teams,the Bears would add a no.1 reciever which they need and get running back who wants out of Phx.,and also a young lineman who could help them rebuild their offensive line.The Cards would get a dynamic slot reciever and possibly a starting running back,and also add depth to the defensive back field.By swapping draft positions it would make the deal better for the Cards,because they would be getting higher ranked players for giving away a Pro Bowl player.I really think this would be a deal that could benefit both teams in the long run.
by RowdyReno on Mar 12, 2009 6:45 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Umm...
A pro bowl wide receiver, a hall of fame running back, and a back up lineman, for three players that have never done anything significant at their positions? And in return swap draft picks? I’m going to have to disagree with that one. The Cardinals get relatively nothing in that deal. All three of those players would ride the bench. I would only understand that trade if we got an additional 1st and 3rd picks.
Hey, hey, hey hey hey, watch the language, ok? I have a family.
Revenge of the Birds
by Andrew602 on Mar 12, 2009 9:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where's the hidden camera?
Did you get my good side on my reaction to this proposal? I reread this 3 times hoping to find a humorous undertone to your words, but alas, there is none. You are actually serious aren’t you? Well sorry to burst your balloon, but there is no way we would ever make that trade. Don’t get me wrong, I am a huge Miami fan, but besides speed, there is nothing to Hester’s game. He is still trying to learn the receiver position and we’ve got enough slots to spread over 3 teams. Daniel Manning isn’t an upgrade on any of our top 3 CBs and therefore wouldn’t even make it as a nickle on our roster. I do like Jones, but the only way I would give you Q for him is with a 1st and 3rd this year and maybe a 6th next year. Elton Brown is a free agent and if you want him, just sign him. Edge, do you really want his $5 mil contract? Sorry, this deal doesn’t benefit us at all. No hard feelings, right?
by hevchv on Mar 12, 2009 10:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
hold on now guys, lets look at this for a second
First of all Elton Brown isn’t under contract so that’s the first big flaw in the deal, but if we’re just going over some ‘mental masturbation’ as Hawk calls it, lets assume we’re doing a “sign and trade” (which they don’t do in the NFL). Ok with that being said, here’s my thoughts.
Assuming that we’re going to cut Edge anyway and we weren’t going to resign Elton Brown, the trade is really Hester, Jones and Manning for Boldin and we’d trade first and second round picks. That would move the Cardinals up to 18th and roughly 50th overall instead of 31st and 62nd. Hester and Manning would fill the void in the return game. Jones is an effective back when healthy and would fill the 3rd down role vacated by JJ and Manning is CB/FS tweener who fill the need for one more cover man.
The trades not great but it fills needs while also giving the Cardinals some decent options. I’d personally respond with “we’ll trade first rounders but we want your second rounder outright and you have a deal.” Thoughts?
by Bezekira on Mar 13, 2009 6:54 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
that’s a very reasoned and sound reply.
The other guys are right though, this is not a legitimate trade for the Cards. 2 special team guys and a backup RB that no one made any effort to sign besides the Bears for one of the best WR in the game and moving up in the first and 2nd.
I’d love to move up, bu that’s not enough value for Boldin. now maybe if they gave us their 2nd round pick and we kept ours, maybe, maybe, but that would mean that the Cards just love Hester. No other team loves Hester though, it’s only the Bears that are this delusional. See Grossman, Rex.
by KDean75 on Mar 13, 2009 7:29 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now for an unreasonable and unsound reply: I quote Jackyl’s song “Mental Masturbation”:
Something ripped a vein
I drive myself insane
Kiss my ass good-bye
Flush it down the drain
I’ll make it fit
Mental masturbation, I think it’s time to use my fist
As in it would take a gauntleted fist up Graves’ ass tickling his appendix to make this trade.
Now I’m off to make Beavis and Butthead noises. “Heeehehehehuh, he said Hester. Like ‘Hester the Molester’.”
by Cardinal_Fang on Mar 13, 2009 10:30 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boldin Trade
I didnt realize Elton Brown was unsigned,but I believe the rest of this proposal makes sense.Sure I would hate to lose Boldin and you can never get equal value for him,but the Cardinals cant afford him either.Lets see you put Hester one on one in the Cardinals spread offense and all defensive coaches would just lose their mind,because everyone knows that if he gets the ball in the open field,he would take it to the house,and Warner would be the perfect quarterback for Hester to recieve passes from.Warner has great touch and would get him the ball early and let Hester run wild after the catch. Teams would have to play nickle and dime defense everytime he was in,and that in turn would open up the running game.Yes Kevin Jones was on the bench, but because of injuries not because he lost his talent or is a malcontent.Trading James for Jones would be shear genius if you could pull it off.Jones would be great in the locker room not a devisive entity as E. James is. And Manning is a Safety and he could replace Francisco who totally blew his coverages in the Super Bowl.It was his inability to do his job that allowed,the Steelers to pass there way down the field and to a Super Bowl win.He is a great Special Teams player but thats it. And as far as swapping draft choices,The Cardinals would be lucky to move up,but not to far because they cant afford pricey players anyways ,up alittle on the draft sequence allows them the chance to get better players in each round.
by RowdyReno on Mar 13, 2009 10:07 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
We just locked up McFadden which in turn will allow Hood to stay at Safety...
so Manning is a moot point. E. James is over the hill and the Bears have a guy by the name of Matt Forte that would start over Edge. Wouldn’t that just make Edge ecstatic??? And trading Q for Hester… Um… Um…
Crackballs gives you WINGSSSSSS!!!!!
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
by boogatt66 on Mar 13, 2009 10:46 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Forte for Boldin…now you’re talking about some good trade mental masturbation. I can take the gauntlet off at least.
by Cardinal_Fang on Mar 13, 2009 10:50 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boldin for Urlacher...
Bump Dansby back outside and let him go at QB’s all day. Hayes and Urlacher up the middle… SICK!
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
by boogatt66 on Mar 13, 2009 10:58 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hood not a safety
Manning would be a great improvement over Francisco, and who cares about E. James,he doesnt care about the team,so who gives a crap about what he thinks.Kevin Jones would give us a great 1-2 combo at running back remember he is still young and has speed. Moving up in the draft is a really big deal in the NFL,but if you added a 3 rounder and Hester for Boldin, would that be enough? Maybe?
by RowdyReno on Mar 13, 2009 11:01 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Before I get any farther, welcome to RotB RowdyReno..
But anyway, I still don’t like the trade but it sure has sparked some good debate. Feel free to post your own fanpost and get the ball rolling on anymore trade ideas you have.
Hey, hey, hey hey hey, watch the language, ok? I have a family.
Revenge of the Birds
by Andrew602 on Mar 13, 2009 11:04 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Kevin Jones would give us a great 1-2 combo
You said US. Didn’t realize you were one of us. Welcome again. Still don’t agree though. But take it in stride. I get a lot of disagreements as well, but mainly I post for stimulating responses. Keep it going RowdyReno.
by hevchv on Mar 14, 2009 10:08 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Meant Rolle
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
by boogatt66 on Mar 13, 2009 11:13 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
dont thin he would be that much of an upgrade
over Rolle. Rolle should come into his own this season and really make a name for himself. As for a trade with the Bears I would be fine with Trading Boldin for Forte swapping swapping 2nds and 3rds and taking a 2010 4th round pick. If you think about it we have a maybe 75% chance to get Mack at 31. then we can swap 2nds and 3rd then take a pick from them in the 2010 draft. Maybe its a little lopsided on the Cards side because we would still be getting Forte but i think its fair. Forte is still not a fully proven back (look at Cadillac Williams rookie to 2nd and 3rd years) but I think he will still hold his own and do just fine in the league.
Never do card tricks for the group you play poker with.
by sc464 on Mar 13, 2009 12:05 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
















