ROTB Community Mock Draft: With the 13th Overall Pick, the Washington Redskins Select...
Andre Smith OT, Alabama
6'4", 332
The Redskins were hoping against hope that Orakpo would fall here, but no such luck. Their need at SLB remains, but after signing high-priced Albert Haynesworth
for the defense, they'll bite the bullet and take troubled Alabama Offensive Tackle Andre Smith at #13. "Ironman" Jon Jansen, the longest-serving Redskin, has had serious issues with keeping healthy over the past few years but also in pass protection, and in the Redskins' new West Coast Offense, pass protection outweighs vicious run blocking. Chris Samuels is still the best Redskins offensive lineman, but isn't nearly as good as his reputation. At guard, the 'Skins replaced Free Agent and former Cardinal Pete Kendall by bringing Derrick Dockery back to DC, so their biggest weakness remains at tackle.
Positives: Voted "Mr. Football" during his High School career in the state of Alabama, Smith has massive size and a prototypical wingspan, and has more than proven his abilities in real game situations with talent, athleticism and good footwork. He'll be a star pupil for legendary line coach Joe Bugel.
Negatives: Smith's off-field troubles have been well-documented. He was suspended from the Alabama football team and prevented from playing in this year's Sugar Bowl for illegal contact with an agent. He reported to the NFL Combine overweight, he dressed inappropriately and bombed his interviews, and he put up a disappointing 19 reps on the bench press. Making things worse, he decided to leave the Combine early without informing anyone. Smith was only slightly more impressive at Alabama's Pro Day, and had lost 7lbs. What the kid doesn't seem to understand is that he cost himself millions of dollars in likely slipping from the 1st third of the draft into the 2nd or even 3rd.
Verdict: The Redskins have shied away from players with spotty reputations off the field in recent years, but Smith's troubles will allow him to fall to the #13 pick, where he's far and away too good a talent to pass up. Smith goes at #13 and starts at Right Tackle in 2009.
Many thanks to our very own DBacksSkins for submitting this pick. The Saints and Boogatt66 are now on the clock (e-mail to revengeofthebirds@gmail.com), with the Texans and Red Reign on deck. If anyone needs to refresh their memory on the draft order, check it here....
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Forgot to mention....
Andre Smith is also good friends with former 1st round pick and Crimson Tidesman Chris Samuels — working closely with his mentor and idol just makes too much sense for the ’Skins not to draft Smith.
With Joe Gibbs no longer around to check Vinny Cerrato and the FO, I don’t expect the ’Skins to be as strict in drafting “character” guys anymore.
We are truly in the presense of greatness here…-- unnamedDBacksfan
Nice write up DbacksSkins
Hey, hey, hey hey hey, watch the language, ok? I have a family.
Revenge of the Birds
::bows::
We are truly in the presense of greatness here…-- unnamedDBacksfan
by DbacksSkins on Mar 24, 2009 10:06 AM MDT up reply actions
That seems to be his only issue.
His stock could have been a lot higher.
Hey, hey, hey hey hey, watch the language, ok? I have a family.
Revenge of the Birds
Yep
Some teams reportedly took him off their draft boards entirely after his debacle at the combine.
We are truly in the presense of greatness here…-- unnamedDBacksfan
by DbacksSkins on Mar 24, 2009 10:21 AM MDT up reply actions
I wouldn't agree with taking him off the board completely
If I was a GM, I would just lower him to the point where the potential reward outweighes the risk. Some established teams have more luxury of taking a gamble on a 1st rounder than others.
Teams with talent and good coaching can afford to miss on a first rounder from time to time and still be competitive. For an unrelated example, the Steelers lost last year’s 1st rounder for the season, and still won the superbowl. A team like that may have more room to gamble on a high pick than a team such as Detroit, who needs their 1st rounder to make an immediate impact.
by AJ BirdWatcher on Mar 24, 2009 10:46 AM MDT up reply actions
Yet,
the Lions have so many holes…. that’s usually the paradox of having the top pick. If your team was bad enough to generate the worst record in the league, you’re almost guaranteed to be better off trading down for, say, multiple picks in the 2nd round.
I’d disagree that they need their first rounder to make an “immediate impact” — let’s be honest, it’s not as if the Lions have some sort of championship window anytime soon. If they’re smart, they’ll do what Charley Casserley did and take a guy like Mario Williams who might be unpopular immediately but make a big impact down the road.
We are truly in the presense of greatness here…-- unnamedDBacksfan
by DbacksSkins on Mar 24, 2009 11:16 AM MDT up reply actions
+1
Lions are rebuilding. I can’t picture an immediate impact.
Hey, hey, hey hey hey, watch the language, ok? I have a family.
Revenge of the Birds
Maybe not an immediate impact on winning...
But you can bet they’re looking for somebody who can come in and start right away. My primary point though was that they can’t afford a 1st round bust, and therefore would be more likely to go with a safer pick.
by AJ BirdWatcher on Mar 24, 2009 1:02 PM MDT up reply actions
yea you're on to something there
On a lesser level, Whiz made mention of that last year because they wouldn’t have to push DRC into the starting lineup and he’d be able to progress at his own pace. Alot of times these guys get pushed into the starting lineup from day one, get abused and are never the same. Winning teams with a better roster can afford to take it slow with rookies while teams like the Lions will be pressured into pushing rookies into the starting lineup.




















