NFC West Position-by-Position: Running Backs
Our second installment (our was the QBs) in our position-by-position analysis of the NFC West brings us to the running backs. Despite a couple of front line star running backs in the division, no team ranked better than 19th in the league in rushing during the 2008 season and every team, except our very own Arizona Cardinals, should return the same week one starter in 2009. There are some new rookies in the division though so lets see what each team thinks about their depth at tail back and we'll rank the division at the end.
Arizona Cardinals
Grading the Cardinals' running backs is difficult because their value is based on potential rather than actual NFL production. The trio of Chris "Beanie" Wells, Tim Hightower and Jason Wright have combined just eleven starts and less than 1,000 combined rushing yards at the NFL level. Jason Wright, an under the radar free agent acquisition, is the longest tenured (five seasons), but he's never logged more than three starts or 62 carries in a season. Tim Hightower, a fifth round pick from a year ago, has the most experience with his seven starts and 143 carries last year, but his 2.8 yards per carry is certainly nothing to brag about. The final member of this trio, Beanie Wells, will be asked play a significant role very early in his career and he's got the talent be a difference maker, but how quickly can he pick up an offense that is night and day from the power running game at Ohio State?
While that may paint a bleak picture of the Cardinals depth at running back, there is some hope that this group can be more productive than the 2008 trio of Edgerrin James, Hightower and JJ Arrington. Wells has the talent to be more productive than the 30 year old Edge and Hightower has reportedly dropped about 15 pounds from his playing weight last year. While I'd love to grade this group based on potential, I'll swallow my homer-ism and try and give them an unbiased evaluation. Grade: D
San Francisco 49ers - Niners Nation
I bounced back and forth on what grade to give the 49ers rushing attack. On the one hand the 49ers run game ranked near the bottom of the league in rushing. On the other hand, they've still got Frank Gore. As the NFL has moved towards more two and three-back systems, the 49ers have struggled to find a running back to complement Frank Gore. By himself, Frank Gore is an A+ running back. He became the first 49ers running back ever to put together three straight 1,000 yard rushing seasons. I think that says even more given the inept nature of the 49ers overall offense. They've lacked consistency at quarterback and their offensive line has struggled mightily at times. The best season for the offensive line happened to come in 2006 when Frank Gore set the 49ers single season rushing record. And that was a 7-9 team with a second year Alex Smith at the helm.
The reason I'm knocking the 49ers down from an A is because of the rest of the rushing situation. Similar to the Cardinals running backs, the 49ers RBs behind Frank Gore are based in large part of potential. In an ideal situation, Gore is the main back, Glen Coffee puts on 10-20 pounds and is the short yardage "power" back and UDFA Kory Sheets is the speed back, a'la the Earth, Wind and Fire of the New York Giants.
The 49ers do have two other backs in camp, Michael Robinson and Thomas Clayton. Michael Robinson was converted to running back from QB out of college and has found a niche in special teams more than anything else. He is also available for Wildcat formations, which may go the way of the DoDo in the Jimmy Raye offense.
And then there's Thomas Clayton. Clayton has been one of the top running backs in preseason play in each of his first two season, which naturally means the bandwagon filled up quickly for this guy. However, he has yet to touch the field in regular season action and he was never offered a contract off the practice squad by another team. If Kory Sheets shines in training camp, Clayton may be hitting the streets.
All things considered, I think the 49ers rushing attack will be markedly improved this season. Frank Gore will still be Frank Gore, but the question will come down to whether some combination of Coffee/Sheets/Clayton steps up. There is a lot of potential there, but none of them has proven a thing in the NFL regular season. They're just as much the key to the 2009 offense as anything else. Grade: B
St. Louis Rams - Turf Show Times
He can run, he can catch a pass, he needs to work on his pass blocking a little bit. The Rams have a real play maker in Steven Jackson, a guy so talented the new coaching regime is building the offense around him. Of course, they'd probably build the offense around a solid running game anyway, but Jackson gives them an edge. The biggest criticism pinned on Jackson in recent years is his seeming inability to play a full 16 games. That's not entirely fair. After a career year in '06, when he led the league in yards from scrimmage, Jackson missed four games in each of the next two season. However, the offensive line, or lack thereof, shoulders some of the blame for his bruised thighs and other ailments. He did nevertheless manage to crank out 1000 yard seasons in each of his last four. This year the Rams have significantly upgraded the line with the additions of C Jason Brown, drafting OT Jason Smith, and bringing in blocking specialists un FB Mike Karney and TE Billy Bajema, some are even calling it a team strength, with the stated goal of making Jackson and the run central their offensive philosophy.
Behind Jackson, the depth chart has some more question marks. They've got a speed guy in Antonio Pittman, but he didn't make much of his chance with Jackson out last year. Was it just the line? Kenneth Darby, an in-season pickup, has been a nice surprise and looks like a legit third down guy. Veteran Samkon Gado will get a shot in camp, and all eyes are anxious to see exactly what kind of back seventh round pick Texas product Chris Ogbonnaya can be outside of a Big 12 spread offense. There's just not enough known commodities behind Jackson to feel good about a replacement...at least not yet. The team will definitely looks to see who becomes a roster casualty when teams pare down their rosters.
I'd give the Rams an A if they had less of a question mark behind Jackson. Without that, they get a B.
Seattle Seahawks - Field Gulls
Seattle's Julius Jones and TJ Duckett are just average rushers, maybe better, but that both are average, and that Jones can contribute as blocker and receiver, makes them together a bit above average -- just not "B" above average. Jones is the complete back. He has a little shake, a little second gear burst, some power, some cutting ability and above average vision. His speed is hard to determine. At Notre Dame he was a burner, but he no longer looks like much of a home run threat. He is a very good, albeit stock receiver. He runs a pure rushing route tree: Outs, in, circles, flares, etc. He shouldn't motion into the slot and he won't dazzle with his receiving ability. He will secure the catch and redirect for run after the catch. So he's a steady, productive outlet receiver that can produce on screens.
Duckett is the interior thumper, but not in a traditional sense. He's not pure north-south and can be a bit picky behind the line. He's sort of a one-cut Earl Cambell, but worse. He blows through arm tackles, falls forward and excels at converting short yardage -- all the stock stuff -- but he also has impressive breakaway speed and some big-man moves. He was a workout warrior at Michigan State, and reportedly ran a 4.45 forty. That translates to good field speed. In his last two seasons, in just 127 attempts (mostly in short yardage), Duckett has a run of 29 yards, two of 32 yards and a 53 yard run in week 16 of 2007.
For reserves, Seattle has Justin Forsett, a tiny-power back (think MJD) type that dominated in the 2007 preseason, but isn't very fast and isn't enough of anything else to tantalize, and Devin Moore, a rookie that isn't much more than a intriguing forty time right now. So no superstars or even superstars to be, but in the right offense, Jones and Duckett could power a very good rushing attack not unlike the Duckett/Dunn duo of the Jim Mora Atlanta Falcons. Grade: C
After much deliberation, we took the easy way out on the rankings:
Tied for first: Rams and Niners
Tied for third: Seahawks and Cardinals
-----------------------------------------------------------------
So what do you guys think? How would you rank the division? Who would you rate as the best back in the division, Gore or Jackson?
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
theres no doubt about it
Gore and Jackson our by the far the best backs in this division. But givin the run blocking abilities of Kreider at full back and Becht at tightend, and given the 3rd straight season of an improving o line the cards have a shot to shock the world again, this time with a RUNNING GAME! Yeah I said it running game.
retarded poll
seriously…… Julius Jones and T.J. Duckett? I wouldn’t trade Jason Wright for all the backs in Seattle.
eh, it's really weak
I guess if you consider that Wells to terrible and Hightower may or may not be much more than a short yardage back, it’s close, but that’s two worst case scenerios. Basically two very marginal players for two highly unproven players.
Hightower
Although I think it was a smart pick to pick up Wells in the first round I really hope Hightower beats him out for the starting role,… for good. I really like Hightower a lot and hope that the loss of weight can make him a little quicker around the end. He SEEMS to have pretting good instincts (screen for a TD in NFC Championship) and definitely the power (exploding the facemask of some joker in San Fran). I guess we just need to wait and see though. I also BELIEVE that with the departure of James Hightower will feel the obligation to study more and be more resposible for the success of the running game and I really think that he has the maturity to step up to the plate. Give me some Kool-aid yo!
Never do card tricks for the group you play poker with.
I like our guys
I think the lack of a running game is more due to a poor scheme than the guys running the ball. I hope the Cards will try to spread out the defense more this season because that is when they can run the ball efficiently. I like the way Hightower runs the ball, and I was high on Beanie well before the draft. I like our RB’s and I would never trade them for any guy on Seattle. Although I hate the Bath House Boys, Frank Gore is an animal, and Steven Jackson is a badass too.
Feel free to grade easier
Just to clarify, you gave the 49’er QB’s a “B” grade, but our RB’s a “D”?
Must have been a class curve grade versus a straight curve.
grades
Each blogger grades their own position. So I was the one who gave the 49ers QBs a B.
by David Fucillo on May 22, 2009 6:45 PM MDT up reply actions
a "b"? are you kidding?!
to give any current niners quarterback a grade higher than average is absurd!
by lifelongcardfan on May 23, 2009 5:01 AM MDT up reply actions
grade
It was based in part on how I felt they would fit into the 49ers 2009 offense. They’re not great QBs by any stretch but in their particular system I can see success.
by David Fucillo on May 24, 2009 11:47 AM MDT up reply actions
It's Not Only About the RB's
Just as I believe a passing attack is more than “just about the QB” but rather an intact many-tentacled “system” involving the QB’s arm, reading skills etc., speed, hands, route running etc. of the receivers, pass blocking and overall timing, teamwork and coordination – the same can be said about the running attack.
The offensive line has to open holes. Linemen have to execute assignments at the LOS and at the second level. Receivers have to be good at blocking down. And let’s not forget about the TE. Unless you have 5 monoliths up front, the timing between blockers and the RB has to be swiss-watch-like.
Naturally, the better the ballcarrier, the more he can exploit the holes, running lanes and holes opened up by his run blockers. But I really believe that “the blockers come first” – i.e. even with average RB’s who are good at the little things (like ball protection, blitz pickup etc.) a team’s running game can be effective enough to at least rank in the middle of the pile.
Taking a long, cold objective look at the Cardinal backfield, I’d rate our RB’s at worst “average” with a tremendous upside in the form of (a) Hightower and his personal development and (b) the potential of Beanie Wells.
But in the end, it will still come down to the “many tentacled” running game beast to make our running attack go.
CHICKEN LITTLE WAS RIGHT!
I thought CG was generous with the "D"
For how many years have the Cardinals been trying to improve their running game (RBs and OL)? Aside from a one year blip of success here and there the Cards have to go back to the “glory” years of the ’70’s and early ’80’s to find a consistently good running game. How many times in just the past decade have the Cardinals had a running game at or very near the bottom of the league? Let’s see, starting with last year the ranking has been 32, 29, 30, 32, 22, 29, 15, 27, 27, & 29. ‘02 with Thomas Jones and Marcel Shipp was pretty good in hindsight! Shipp and Emmitt in ’04 was our last whiff of “middle of the pack” and that would be C- middle of the pack @ 22. And before folks pout about the “passing game takes away from the running game” the Cardinals mantra has forever been “establish the run and ball control” (Whisenhunt didn’t invent the concept fellas) yet it’s their inability to do that that puts the onous on the passing game. Thank goodness for WFQB!
Historically speaking, I’d give the Cardinals a Charlie Brown grade of Z-. Based on last year’s regular season an F. But, seeing a glimmer of balance in the post-season (with a player no longer on the team) and seeing Hightower melt the clock against a crushed Panthers squad, how can CG’s D grade be anything but fair considering the big IF of Wells, Wright, and Hightower behind a OL that we cannot even agree is being used appropriately? It’s this running game questions that helps the “experts” predict the Super Bowl Loser Curse continues.
We all leave footprints in the sands of time, just watch out for the discarded fish hooks!
"Z" is a little harsh.
I say at least an “X” because our last place ranking could have been accomplished by some girls.
Yeah I think Shipp was a pretty good RB
Someones gotta be 32nd right?




















