Revenge of the Birds Chats With FSN Arizona's Jody Jackson
With the draft getting smaller and smaller in the rear view mirror, the Arizona Cardinals turn their focus to the future and ROTB will try to analyze the roster, draft and future from every possible angle. Part of that strategy will include landing big interviews with those who know the team best, like Jody Jackson of Fox Sports Arizona. Jackson, who covers the team on two different FSN shows, has some unique insights after nearly a decade of covering the Red Birds:
RTOB - Since we've got some ROTB readers who might not be familiar with your fine work, can you tell us a little about yourself, how you came cover the Cardinals and what is your current involvement with the team? Also where can fans catch your show?
Jody Jackson - I am a die-hard football fan originally from the Miami-Ft. Lauderdale area. I am a Miami Hurricane (1995 grad) and after working in sports radio in Miami, I spent 2 years at the CBS affiliate in Buffalo, NY covering the Bills and Sabres. In 2000, I moved to the desert covering all the sports teams here in Arizona. My love for football drew me close to the Cardinals and I began hosting their show, "Maximum Cardinals" as well as doing sideline reports on the preseason games. I also host "Cardinals Live" here at Fox Sports Arizona Sunday nights during football season. Glenn Parker has done a fantastic job providing analysis for this show, as well as Paul Calvisi serving as our fine reporter in the locker room!
ROTB - Now that we're closely acquainted and expectations are flying high in the desert, how far has this team and franchise come since you first started covering them? What has been the biggest cause for change in your mind?
JJ - The obvious change is the stadium and the way the fan base has made game days special here in AZ. But the building was just the start. The Bidwills made the move to hire Ken Whisenhunt, and he has proven himself in 2 short years. Let's face it; he's done something we never expected in taking the Cards to the Super Bowl. His plan, his coaching staff, and his coaching expertise have made the difference. Rod Graves and Steve Keim have done a great job as well when it comes to identifying talent and "building the core".
ROTB - Most fans, and almost all of us here at ROTB, stand behind everything that Ken Whisenhunt does and view him as one of the best moves that this franchise has ever made. You've seen a couple of different coaches roll through here, so what sets Whiz apart from previous head coaches or did he just get here at the right time?
JJ - He did inherit some great players drafted by Dennis Green, and Kurt Warner was here as well. But it's all about making the right decisions. Whiz called the plays in the first year, and subsequently found out a lot about his 2 quarterbacks. When the running game didn't work in 2007, he let Warner sling the ball. He adjusted to his team's strengths. Then in training camp he made the call to go with Warner in '08. Seems like a no-brainer now, right? Think about the possible distractions in an unhappy Q and Edge all of last season. And yet they went to the last game and were 2 minutes and 37 seconds away from winning it all. He is very cerebral and doesn't let his emotions take over in his decision making. I believe that is what has made the difference.
ROTB - The Cardinals entered the off season with loads of cap room, more than a handful of free agents and several players who weren't exactly pleased with their current contracts. Some players were retained, some were let go and the some players are still unhappy, but overall one could argue that the Cardinals look to be more talented right now than they were this time last year. How do you view the Cardinals off season moves so far? Best move/Worst Move?
JJ - As much as I hate to see a great guy and a hard worker like Rod Hood go, I think signing Bryant McFadden is a terrific move. Steeler imports have worked well so far..... Curious how Beanie Wells will fit in, but I think he has the potential to be a bruising back.
Worst moves could be in the defensive front seven. We will all be okay with Antonio Smith getting his cash in Houston if Calais Campbell and Kenny Iwebema can do the job. Last year in limited action they played well. Antonio had a great playoff run with a safety in the Atlanta game and then stripping Jake Delhomme early in the Carolina game to swing the momentum. Campbell could become that type of player-remember it took Antonio a few years to develop. We'll see how the linebackers shake out under new DC Billy Davis. The draft picks, Cody Brown and Will Davis may take a little while to contribute.
ROTB - The Cardinals enter the season with high, yet actually realistic, hopes of repeating as NFC West Champs and a return trip to the playoffs, but that doesn't mean that they are without question marks. What area of this team is the most concerning to you and is a weakness that they can overcome?
JJ - I think it will be interesting to see if they are able to be more balanced on offense. We all know a more consistent running game will help keep Warner healthy back there. They don't have to run a lot, just be successful when they have to and keep defenders at bay. Tight end is still a question mark, but Anthony Becht is a good blocker and a very durable player. I think that on defense they could actually be a better unit with Billy Davis as DC, but again, there are personnel moves and we will have to see how they come together.
ROTB - For the last question I'll throw out an easy one......Predictions for the '09 season?
JJ - The schedule sets up really well for them-on paper. We all know paper doesn't tell us much in the NFL! No cold weather games, except for Tennessee perhaps. Maybe Chicago if winter comes in the first week of November. Beginning at home and ending with 2 home games is comfortable as well. No nightmarish Thanksgiving games on the East coast after playing just 5 days earlier. That said, it all comes down to winning the division, and I think they will do that again. I am too smart to go and try to predict playoff victories, but just for fun and because I'd love to go back to my home state of FLA, I'll say Cards vs. the odds makers favorite- the Patriots (although I wouldn't count out the Steelers). I know, you are rolling your eyes. Hey a girl can dream, right???
---------------------------------------------------------
Many, many thanks to Jody for taking the time to answer some questions. Don't forget to surf the TV Guide for her shows, Maximum Cardinals and Cardinals Live, where you'll not only hear great analysis but also regular interviews with players and coaches. Thoughts?
0 recs |
50 comments
|
Comments
Nice "Get"
Terrific interview with Jody.
One question – Did I miss something? Or did FS Arizona fail to cover the draft? I live in NJ and can access FS AZ via DirecTV, but when I checked out the scheduling grid for air times before. during and after the draft, I didn’t see any Cardinal draft-related programming (under the label, “Maximum Cardinals”, “Cardinals Live” or anything else). Did FS AZ fail to cover the Cardinals’ draft? Or did they simply fold it into a more general all sports highlights program?
CHICKEN LITTLE WAS RIGHT!
by JJeff88 on May 7, 2009 9:07 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
good question (that I don't have an answer to)
I’d have to think that they covered it though. Maybe they named it something different, although Cardinals Live only comes on during the season.
by Bezekira on May 7, 2009 9:49 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You beat me to the punch!!!
NICCCCCCCCCEEEE!!!!
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
by boogatt66 on May 7, 2009 12:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
She's incorrect
when she says this: Then in training camp he made the call to go with Warner in ’08. Seems like a no-brainer now, right?
She’s mistaken. Whisenhunt didn’t make that decision public until after the final preseason game against Denver.
Based on the way Warner played during the 2007 in place of an injured Leinart, it’s kind of hard to understand why Whisenhunt named Leinart the starter going into 2008, and only named Warner the starter after the final preseason game.
by GeoMak on May 7, 2009 11:06 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
We still got her point
What she was trying to say is that Whisenhunt played the player who gave him the best chance to win instead of playing the most popular guy… it’s very easy to predict the past, but if you go back to those days, Leinart was supposed to be the saviour of this franshise (still think he is the future) and Warner was a mistake and injury prone veteran QB, so it was not as easy as it sounds now, and it was a decision that not every coach will make, remember how McGinnis and Deny Green used to play guys based more on their reputation (salary or high draft pick) than their actual performance… Go CARDINALS.
paco cabrera
by pacocab on May 7, 2009 12:25 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Her 'point'
was wrong. Whisenhunt named Matt Leinart the starter going into 2007 and going into 2008.
Ken Whisenhunt was determined to play Leinart over warner.
Only when it became obvious to anybody with half a brain that Warner was the better QB did he name Warner the starter (a week before the opening of 2008).
Her statement was wrong. He made the call long, long after training camp. He made the call August 30th. A week before the opening game against SF.
That’s not even close to making the call in training camp.
She looks bad making a CLEAR mistake like that. Whisenhunt looks bad in having to go down to the wire with, in Jackson’s words ‘a no-brainer now.’
Just stating the facts. To some people, facts matter.
by GeoMak on May 7, 2009 1:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did someone shit in your Cornflakes this morning Geo???
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
by boogatt66 on May 7, 2009 1:14 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Looks like he’s trolling, these are his only comments on ROTB. But why this would set someone off is a little weird. Sounds like someone’s fan mail was answered.
by KDean75 on May 7, 2009 1:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
No
Just clearing something up. That’s all. Her statement’s totally incorrect. Not good for a reporter. Not only didn’t he make the call in training camp, he didn’t make it after training camp.
He didn’t make the call during the preseason games. He only made the call after training camp and after the preseason, right before the start of the regualr season.
And, she’s completely ignoring the QB controversy last year that Whisenhunt caused by naming Leinart the starter after 2007 and then opening up the job to competition after Warner insisted on there being open competition.
If Ken Whisenhunt is so smart, why’d it take him till August 30th to FINALLY settle on Kurt Warner as his teams starter?
by GeoMak on May 7, 2009 1:23 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
It didn't take someone with a half-a-brain to figure this out.
Everyone knew Kurt gave us the best chance to win after finishing out the ‘07 season. Whiz’ phylosophy (and most other coaches for that matter) was that you don’t lose your postion due to injury. Leinart was the starter before he got injured and when he got healthy again, he retained his starting status. After that, he opened up the competition. Don’t assume that Kurt wasn’t his choice for starter all along. From the outside looking in you only see what the media wants you to see. I can only assume that Whiz got a little pressure from the FO to start the highly paid young QB of the Future. So he gave him every opportunity to do so and he didn’t capitalize on it. I have no doubt that Matt can lead us successfully, but Kurt is by far the better QB.
And change your diaper. All that SH!T is making you cranky. Training camp, OTAs or Preseason, who gives a rats arse besides you. She is still HOT!!!!
by hevchv on May 7, 2009 10:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
sounds awful ticky tacky if you ask me
Training camp was over around Aug. 22nd and Warner was named the starter around the 30th. Are you really getting your panties in a wad over one week?
Chill out man. Her point wasn’t the timing of the announcement, it was that Whiz makes decisions that are best for the team.
by Bezekira on May 7, 2009 1:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Then why did
he ‘decide’ to name Leinart the starter before the 2008 season. Was that another one of his decisions that were best for the team?
As far as your timeline is concerned, the SF 49ers have a QB competition going on. There are about two weeks of training camp before pre-season games start. Most people (like the 49ers) refer to those two weeks of ‘training camp." The time after that is more commonly referred to as the ’pre-season.’
It’s a matter of semantics, and you are correct with your dates, but when Mike Singletary stated that he wanted to settle on a starter, he specifically referred to the time before the start of preseason games.
Saying that Whisenhunt decided during training camp when it was actually the week before the start of the season is ridiculous.
by GeoMak on May 7, 2009 2:10 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
wait wait wait
so you’re railing on her for being a couple of days off but then being very lax with your assertion that most people consider training camp only time period before the first preseason game? Training camp is training camp until the team leaves Flagstaff. Who gives a damn about what the Niners are doing? Oh wait (looking at your profile……), now it’s starting to make sense, you’re a Niners fan. Ok.
As for argument that she’s making Whiz sound like a genius for making a decision that was common knowledge, you know good and well that teams regularly give a young kid, especially one who was a high draft pick, the starting nod even if the guy behind him might be better suited to start at the current time. Get down off your high horse or go back the Bay.
by Bezekira on May 7, 2009 2:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interviews of Media Types
Geomak , there are but two things that I require when listening or reading an interview. That they be factual and interesting. Tell us something we don’t already know or are not aware of. Hawkwind and others that post to site seem not to be interested in the “facts”. I like my football “IQ” to be raised not lowered. That should be the ultimate goal. The only opinions that seem to matter are the one’s they’re in agreement with.
One should not be knocked for wanting the facts or accuracy. Media types have a greater responsibility and should be held to a higher standard. Geomak , keep your standards high. In the end , it is good for all.
Quote " If possible no animosisty should be felt for anyone …… To speak angrily to a person, to show your hatred by what you say or by the way you look is an unneccessary proceeding—- dangerous, foolish, rediculous, and vulgar " . Authur Schopenhauer 1788-1860
by Cardsfan81 on May 9, 2009 3:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you are missing the concept.
This is a site made for fans by fans. Sometimes we just want to cut loose and have fun. If you want facts and are not satisfied with us, I’m sure your appetite can be tamed by one of the OFFICIAL sites that are as boring as all your quotes.
by hevchv on May 9, 2009 7:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're Funny
We can agree to diagree. No body moves, nobody gets hurt. Sounds like you’re getting a ltlle testy hevch. If you dont like what you see then ignore it. I am sure I haven’t said (wrote) anything intelligent to you. For me it’s not personal. For you? Sounds like it to me. Why throw your colleagues under the bus like that by saying the Official sites are boring?
What about those Official Sites. Could you be more specific - please.
Quote “A prince need trouble about conspiracies when the people are well disposed of, but when they are hostile and hold him in hatred, then he must fear everything and everybody”. Niccolo Machivelli, 1469-1527
by Cardsfan81 on May 9, 2009 9:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The official sites aren't my colleagues.
RotB is. And for the record, I wouldn’t throw my colleagues under the bus. You, I’d be tempted to leave there. Not testy, just spunky. I’m probably having more fun with this than you. Just ask my wife. She is laughing with me.
by hevchv on May 10, 2009 12:16 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now your quoting Machiavelli???
Are you implying Hev is systematically using some Machiavellian scheme to dispose of any naysayers on ROTB? Wow, deep man! I bet all of your “colleges” are really impressed with your pseudo intellectual grab bag of quotes. Save ’em dude, they are really lame and you read like a bar napkin at a Sun City happy hour.
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
by boogatt66 on May 11, 2009 11:10 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it's funny....
….that he is trying to prove he is smarter than everyone else, but he lacks the ability to spell “ridiculous” correctly in the quote five posts above. Then he misspells “Arthur Schopenhauer.”
When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome again.
-Barney Stinson
by Red Reign on May 11, 2009 12:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
And "Machivelli"...
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
by boogatt66 on May 11, 2009 1:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's all about....
….raising IQs and holding yourself to a higher standard.
When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome again.
-Barney Stinson
by Red Reign on May 11, 2009 1:30 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes it makes you look rEdiculous
or ridiculous, don’t worry I know what you mean’t
by badmatty53 on May 12, 2009 1:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
GeoMak, people make mistakes and everyone's complaint is that you're making a big deal out of something very small.
I admit, when I read that in her interview, the fact fanatic in my brain said “that’s not exactly right”, but the person in me said “but I understand what she’s meaning”. She is technically wrong, but as someone else mentioned, it’s two days and the official season hadn’t started so I can consider her technically right.
Just a word of advice. We at ROTB have a great community who will argue our points and laugh at a good joke, but being overly picky or openly provoking someone for a response is not the ROTB way.
by CardsFan08 on May 7, 2009 5:05 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Look
I simply stated that she made a completely incorrect statement. She wasn’t close on the dates and she completely bypassed the QB controversy.
Your problem with that is what?
by GeoMak on May 7, 2009 1:35 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Tact.
You came off abrasive and like a complete Douche Bag!
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
by boogatt66 on May 7, 2009 1:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Go to my
10:06 post and please, please tell me what word or words you found tactless and/or abrasive.
I’ll be waiting.
by GeoMak on May 7, 2009 1:44 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
your first post was fine
but as soon as someone tried to say, we all knew what she meant, you had to jump back with she’s clearly wrong and making such an egregious mistake is inexcusable.
by Bezekira on May 7, 2009 1:50 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well
what ‘pacocab’ said after my first point was also wrong. What does ‘we knew what she meant’ mean when she completely misconstrued the situation.
Jackson clearly made it sound like Whisenhunt ‘went out on a limb’ and made a difficult choice in training camp.
Unfortunately, the facts are almost completely different. That’s the reality. Any ‘bashing of me’ and ‘supporting Jackson’s statement’ isn’t going to change the reality.
Not only was she wrong as far as the timing goes, but she completely ignored the entire QB controversy that lasted until August 30th.
I went to the final preseason game against Denver. Most of the season ticketholders around me thought that Matt Leinart was going to start the season. This was on August 29th. The next day Whisenhunt named Warner the starter.
That’s not even close to: Then in training camp he made the call to go with Warner in ’08
by GeoMak on May 7, 2009 2:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fine, you’ve mentioned this many times, your point is made.
My problem with your grandstanding is that you joined ROTB simply to rip on this interview.
by KDean75 on May 7, 2009 1:40 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're funny.
I didn’t ‘rip’ the interview. I simply pointed out that she was mistaken.
Anybody that followed the team last year would have known that.
Are you saying that Jackson or anybody else is above having a mistake pointed out?
by GeoMak on May 7, 2009 1:51 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, exactly what I'm saying
I’m mesmerized by her blond beauty.
Funny that that same question you asked could be asked of yourself.
by KDean75 on May 7, 2009 2:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
now that I look back through archives
Camp ended on the 22nd (a Friday), the Cards played the Raiders the next day and on the following day ESPN had the rumor that Warner was being named the starter.
Whiz of course denied the rumor for another week and even at the time we chalked that up to him not wanting the Niners to have an extra week to prepare for just one QB.
Believe whatever you want, but your all bent out of shape about two days. Quite frankly I think you’re the one that’s wrong or maybe she should have listed the date and time that Warner made the announcement to appease the chronically anal.
by Bezekira on May 7, 2009 2:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Read
my post at 1:10 above (Then why did) for a more comprehensive explanation about the dates in question.
I’m not bent out of shape at all over a week. She’s mistaken on the dates, and moreover, she was disingenous with her overall point.
She made it seem like he’s really smart cause he eventually decided on Warner.
After the way Warner played in 2007, there never should have been any question or QB controversy to begin with.
by GeoMak on May 7, 2009 2:14 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Semantics
–noun (used with a singular verb) 1. Linguistics. a. the study of meaning.
b. the study of linguistic development by classifying and examining changes in meaning and form.
2. Also called significs. the branch of semiotics dealing with the relations between signs and what they denote.
3. the meaning, or an interpretation of the meaning, of a word, sign, sentence, etc.: Let’s not argue about semantics.
For some people preseason = training camp and vice versa. If she said “made a decision in preseason” this would be a moot discussion.
We all leave footprints in the sands of time, just watch out for the discarded fish hooks!
by Hawkwind on May 8, 2009 11:17 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The mistakes of ken Whisenhunt
A). Naming Leinart the starter after the 2007 season for 2008. Even a cursory look at the stats between Leinart’s 5 starts in 2007 and Warner’s 11 starts makes that almost laughable. Looking at the stats (or watching the games) shows NO reason to name Leinart the starter over Warner. None!
B). The, after Warner lobbies for an open competition, Whisenhunt agrees. Leinart’s still the starter, but Warner is allowed to compete for the job. If it’s an ‘open competition’ why still name one guy the starter.
C). Whisenhunt goes down to the wire (after the preseason and a week before the regular season) in naming Warner then starter. Most coaches name a starter (if there is a competition) before the preseason or after a preseason game or two. Waiting until the week before the seeason starts is almost unheard of.
Fortunately, Ken Whisenhunt came to his senses. What took so long coach?
by GeoMak on May 7, 2009 2:38 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Frankly you're so far off, you're not worth our time
I hope everyone else makes the same decision that I am and simply ignores you.
Ha, it looks like your bit gets old everywhere considering you’ve been banned or warned from multiple SBN sites….it looks like you’re headed in the same direction here.
by Bezekira on May 7, 2009 2:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just wondering
what in my 1:38 post is factually incorrect or you specifically disagree with.
I mean, it’s all true, so I’m curious as to what I’m so far off of here.
Please tell.
BTW: I have to confess, I do like it when I post something that’s factually correct and people get all ballistic over it. It is kind of funny. Watching people line up to bash me when I simply point something out that’s TRUE (if anyone is paying attention).
by GeoMak on May 7, 2009 2:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where’d Kenny Wheaton go to high school?
by KDean75 on May 7, 2009 3:01 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Still waiting Bezekira
what in my 1:38 post is factually incorrect or you specifically disagree with.
I mean, it’s all true, so I’m curious as to what I’m so far off of here.
Please tell.
by GeoMak on May 7, 2009 3:21 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
To say that he didn’t “make that decision public” doesn’t mean that his decision process was short and thoughtless. On the contrary, Whiz made a decision as a new coach to play the $50 million draft pick. Leinart broke his collar bone, Warner played well with his shoulder in a sling (proving most everybody wrong), and the season ended. Whiz says its unfair to lose your starting position to an injury, so he names Leinhart the starter for 2008 (being very clear that he was the starter because of his injury, but also indicating that the QB position was no different than any other position on the team — there is always competition for every job).
Only after training camp and some preseason, Whiz makes the decision (according to rumblings around the ESPN watercooler) to make Warner the starter for the season, but it is denied publicly.
Yes, I would say that Whiz should be commended for his over two year process of playing the right QB. And yes, he was right — 5-11 (before him), 8-8 with two QB’s, and 9-7 / NFC West Champ / NFC Champ / Super Bowl contender (after making the decision to play Warner)
You are too simplistic Geo, and that is why you are wrong.
by FANinNY1 on May 7, 2009 4:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Welcome to ROTB
Everyone on here isn’t as bad as they seem…PLEASE STAY…please…
by badmatty53 on May 7, 2009 4:57 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes we are
When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome again.
-Barney Stinson
by Red Reign on May 7, 2009 11:51 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good job getting another solid interview guys
First Urban, than Cody Brown and now another person very close to the team. I certainly agree with her thoughts on having a more balanced offense.
by Bezekira on May 7, 2009 3:46 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Nobody beats the Whis
He is a great coach and has earned my trust and confidence, so I stand by every decision he has made in the past and decision he makes for our future… GO Whis and Go Cardinals
paco cabrera
by pacocab on May 7, 2009 5:49 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

















