Which is better? Sometimes I’ve got to have a chocolate cone. Other times (especially after very heavy Italian meals) I’d kill for some lemon sorbet.

As they say in the Army: “It depends on the terrain.”

Fitz and Q each have a few different attributes. Fitz is pure money jumping high to fight for a ball. There are few if any tougher wideouts other than Boldin running after the catch.

In the Cardinal offense, all 11 players have a part to play on any given down. (i.e. if Deuce blows his assignment, Kurt doesn’t get the ball off in time and the ball never reaches Q or Fitz).

Within that context, there is no such thing as a “#1” or “#2” receiver. Just “receivers” who have different roles during each offensive play. This #1 and #2 stuff is just something created by media pundits who need to find something to write about.

From a contract and locker room chemistry standpoint, trying to make this an issue is not helpful.

Having stated the obvious, the dumbshit might want to take this into consideration before he speaks next time:

Michael Irvin stated that if he was starting a team that Boldin would be the first WR he’d take, Antrel Rolle said Boldin is the most difficult receiver he’s ever covered, he has been to 3 Pro Bowls in six seasons with a franchise, that until recently, was a place that wasn’t exactly highly respected throughout the league, plays through injuries that would sideline most linebackers, and his career stats/pro bowl selections through his first six years in the league equal or surpass that of the aforementioned Cowboy HOF WR.

Of course, compared to Prisco what would a guy like Irvin know?

We are blessed to have him

Boldin and Fitz are about equal, they are just better at different things.