How Important Is Neil Rackers To The Arizona Cardinals?
by Andrew602 on Jan 21, 2010 11:45 AM MST
in 2010 Offseason
14 comments
There's been plenty of discussion lately among fans about what the Cardinals should do with kicker Neil Rackers. He'll be entering free agency in March and the Cardinals must decide if they'll resign the 34 year old, or risk letting him walk. Although he's experienced his share of heart-breaking misses, he's been a valuable asset to the Cardinals special teams unit the past two seasons. Let's take a look at some of the positives and negatives from the former pro bowl kicker.
The Positives
He has a boot - Ever since Rackers shoes were sent to the Hall of Fame(twice) for nailing three kicks in one game from beyond 50 yards in 2004, and making 40 field goals in 2005, he's been known for his heavy leg. Rackers can consistently land kickoffs in opponents endzones(we saw the difference with Nugent), and has the leg to make even the deepest of field goals. That alone will be a determining factor for the Cardinals organization to consider.
He's the 11th man in coverage - We've seen it before - Rackers sacrificing his body on kickoff duties. He's not scared to do the dirty work and make a special teams tackle if needed. We'll rarely see him shy away from contact like Jeff Reed in Pittsburgh, and there's been countless times when Rackers has kept an opposing teams' return man from breaking a big run. This could be a testament to the Cardinals very good coverage unit this past year.
His technique - Rackers takes the time and effort to tweak each and every one of his kicks to the point that they look flawless(yes, flawless). For the last two years his "pooch" kicks have been admirable, catching opponents off guard and landing in the right place at the right time. His onside kicks have worked wonders for the Cardinals too - even Rackers has recovered his own kick before.
But with every positive, comes a negative...
The Negatives
Pressure gets to Neil - Cardinal fans may shudder when they think of Neil Rackers knocking kicks wide left against the Bears, Chiefs, 49ers, [and now the Packers], especially when the game is on the line. We can speculate all we want as to why he botched the chip shot against the Packers two weeks ago, but the reality is that he missed a relatively easy kick in that situation. Either way, this is something that may cloud the Cardinals judgement on whether or not they should keep him as a member of the team next year.
Injury problems - His fearlessness on kickoff coverage is certainly commemorable, but it can plague the kicker at times. He's suffered injuries as a result of his tough-nosed style, that have forced him to miss action(and kicks) the last few years. We saw how ineffective Rackers could be the last two weeks when he's unhealthy and it's not a sight many Cardinal fans are ready to witness again. If Rackers returns, his health needs to be a primary focus.
When it all comes down to it, there are more positives supporting the cause for Neil Rackers then negatives. I love his bravery on kick coverage, I love the work he puts into his technique, and I hope that he can prove the us all wrong and make some game-winning field goals if he stays with the organization. What are your thoughts and why should the Cardinals sign or not sign Neil Rackers?
0 recs |
14 comments
|
Email
Print
Comments
Definitely keep him
Pro’s far outweigh the con’s. He’s been a solid kicker. Plus…how much can a kicker cost us?
exactly
where I end up on the decision…cost. May be unfair, but with all the contracts that need to be worked, if the front office can’t get something ‘reasonable’ done to keep him, then…well…
Nah cut him loose
If you cant make the kick in the clutch, you shouldnt be the team’s kicker, full stop. Its like having a receiver who only makes the catch when there’s nothing on the line. Think how ridiculous a player that would make. It should be the same for kickers, I dont care how many tackles he makes.
And do what?
Pick up someone untested? It’s not like good kickers are just lying about…
They are who we thought they were!
When did he last make a clutch kick?
I would not describe Rackers as a good kicker.
by Irishcardinal on Jan 21, 2010 3:19 PM MST up reply actions
Maybe I do
But blowing it three or four times in a row isnt down to chance. Its down to a flawed psyche. Could anyone on here honestly say they’d trust him with a kick from any? distance with a playoff or superbowl game on the line?
by Irishcardinal on Jan 22, 2010 1:13 PM MST up reply actions
um no.
What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds
Nice read from MJD regarding this. I say vote Rackers independent of this article though.
When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome again. True story.
-Barney Stinson
keep him
His ability to make tackles has been huge in preventing points for the opposition. Every kicker misses some big ones and it isn’t necessarily chocking. Plus, Rackers has gotten very good at kickoffs into the corner, which allows coverage to trap the guy with the ball. Also very good at onside kicks. He’s a significant plus overall.
Keep him.
When he heals up he will be fine.
Lifelong Arizona Cardinals/Chicago Bears fan.
I can't stand band-wagoner fans, stick with your team, throughout the good and the bad.
Granted...
Rackers has been a little shaky with the game on the line, but who would we get to replace him? There’s nobody available that I would trust any more than The Rack. With anybody else, we also wouldn’t be getting his monster boot, his onside kicks, and his superior tackling ability (lol I may be inflating his tackling skills slightly). Still, you may knock him on a few missed field goals over the past few seasons, but his onside kicks and special teams plays have been an equally large factor in some wins as well.
Keep The Rack!
sign him
if the price is right, if his demands are out of line, let him go.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
