Good For, Bad For...
This segment is designed to spit out random subjects in the league, mainly with the Cardinals, and to give readers a chance to debate whether it is good for the player, team, division, etc. or if it bad for the player, team, division, etc. As a huge Cardinals fan I am always interested to see how every move made in the NFL affects my beloved team. This forum will allow us to openly discuss the pros and cons and possible effects of each.
- Big Bert retires from the Cardinals. We will miss his pass rush and leadership. He was an unsung hero with his timely sacks in the Wildcard game. His retirement opens the door for more PT for our young pass rushers. Is Bert's retirement good for or bad for the Cardinals?
- Old Grey Beard is seriously contemplating retirement, again. He has been an amasing leader for our offense. There is no doubt he makes some of our receivers look better because of his surgical like precision. We wouldn't have been as successful without him. It is no secret Kurt would prefer to pass the ball 100% of the game. With his eventual retirement, the Cards may have no choice but to become a more balanced team. We have a stable of great young backs who could quite possibly carry the offense. Would Kurt's retirement be good for or bad for the Cardinals.
- Pete Carrol is the new HC of the Seatle Shehawks. He also has final say on the 53 man roster. Although his previous stint as the head man in the NFL lead to his dismissal, he was by far a better coach than many today. He left with a winning record and proceeded to lead USC to greatness. The past few years have seen the Skirts fall apart due to injury and just plain old Old Age. It is no secret that coaches like to bring in players and coaches they are familiar with. In saying that and knowing our troubles with speedy backs, Reggie Bush could be available this summer as the team is not impressed with him thus far. To make matters worse, Lindel White either wants a trade or to be released in search of more playing time. That formula doesn't always work in this league and Seatle has recently been our doormat. Could the hiring of Pete Carrol be good for or bad for the Cardinals?
- The Superbowl is only a few weeks away and then afterwards the offseason officially begins for all 32 teams. With so much speculation that this summer could be an uncapped year, many players will choose to go where the money is. Although the Bidwells have recently been opening up the purse, they are known to be pretty thrifty. And although Arizona is becoming a great landing spot for players who want to win (couldn't say that a few years ago, thanks Whiz), will the enticement of a bigger payday be too intoxicating for players to resist? Our very own Karlos Dansby has said that he is excited about an uncapped year for the possibilities of all that money. Can we afford to keep him? Is an ucapped year good for or bad for the Cardinals?
- And speaking of money, Q has been quiet most of the year but we all know he either wants to be paid or traded. Q is no doubt on of, if not, the toughest players on the team. There is no need to go into detail there. However, in his absence, the younger receivers have proven that they can step up and it is reflected by our record. Since last year fans have been torn over whether we should keep him or trade him. Many teams are in need of a good receiver and the return could be quite substancial in regards to draft picks. If we keep Q he is still such a great value for his salary, but he would walk at the end of next season and we'd get nothing in return. If we trade him, we could get some much needed picks in the draft this year. Would it be good for or bad for the Cards to trade Q?
Everyone's opinions are always welcomed and appreciated. Let me know if this something you'd like me to continue or stop.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Revenge of the Birds' (ROTB) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of ROTB's editors.
31 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
continue, I like it
1) Good and bad. Bert was a good player, but we need to inject some youth. Him declaring retirement forces us to do that and by doing it early, gives the Cards time to prepare.
2) Bad if Warner retires. I don’t see anything good that can overcome the bad.
3) Hate U of Spoiled Children, and I don’t think Carroll’s that great of a coach, but this is bad.
4) Undecided. Sorry, that’s lame, but I’m just not sure yet.
5) Very good to trade Q. Let the guy get what he wants, #1 WR, and it helps us by getting the draft picks. With our myriad needs on defense there’s not enough picks to get a QB early. Trading Q for picks could enable us to get a guy like LeFevour.
by KDean75 on Jan 22, 2010 8:44 AM MST reply actions 1 recs
Same mind, This is great stuff HevChv
1) Good. Bert was a great player and I think was an excellent situational pass rusher. We all know his past injuries and his accomplishments, so it’s easy to say that without a fresh B-Train on defense for the occasional down we wouldn’t have had very much of a pass rush this year. But as KDean mentioned, his “declaring retirement forces us to do that and by doing it early, gives the Cards time to prepare.”
2) Bad if Warner retires. The Cards have so many issues to address this year that if Warner retires it may be too much of a turnaround for one year to continue our winning record success.
3) Bad because Carroll has an eye for talent, though is unproven in the NFL. He has so much power over his team he may be able to pull down some quality free agents and possibly target some Cardinals to carry over there success and strategies.
4) Let Karlos walk. It’s hard to say after his incredible GB game performance, but honestly he wants too much money for doing an above average job. Only a few times during the year did he seem like an elite player. Do I like him, of course. But he wants way too much to be middle cog. If the Cards are going to spend that kind of money go get Julius Peppers!
5) Very good to trade Q. Totally agreed with KDean “Let the guy get what he wants, #1 WR, and it helps us by getting the draft picks. With our myriad needs on defense there’s not enough picks to get a QB early. Trading Q for picks could enable us to get a guy like LeFevour.”
Section 102, Row 18
Good stuff
1. I also agree good and bad. Okeafor was our worst LB this year and I would rather lose him than Bert. But at the same time, we desperately need some youth and athleticism in our LB core. This does force our hand.
2. Also agree. Warner is the engine that drives that powers our O. With his quick release gone I think we might truly see how poor our offensive line is.
3. Good. Carrol is going to need to rebuild the team for it to be successful. Also he is a Ra-Ra kind of coach and needs to have excellent coordinators around him. He is also use to exceptional talent. I mean, how many star/quality QB’s, WR’s, RB’s, LB’s, etc have come out of USC?
4. Bad. I like the balance and parity in the NFL today. The only good that can come out of this is a rookie salary cap. Untested rookie do not deserve the money they get. Period.
5. Agree. Trade him and draft all D and maybe 1 O. I love the man. I want to see the man paid, but I think for the long term its better to have some money for players on D that we can pay than to have two very high paid WR’s.
They are who we thought they were!
by Jesse Reynolds on Jan 22, 2010 10:57 AM MST reply actions
1. the good news is that we'll lose both this offseason
The only way Okeafor comes back is on a Berry like deal from last year (one year for peanuts).
Be careful....to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
Comment
1. Berry will be missed but there should not be any problem finding a replacement. Brown or draft picks will fill the role.
2. I am still critical of keeping Warner. Yes it drives the offense and they feel like they can win but it also makes it negative. If another QB comes in this team feels like they can’t win and that is not good. They will have to make adjustments this year or next to get ready for Warner to leave. If the team doesn’t feel right with Leinart then they need to find a QB they like.
3. Carrol has looked good at USC because he gets many top players at the college level. I don’t think he will keep the talent level coming into Seattle. Bush looked good for one game but Hayes was gone in the middle and that just showed the lack of depth at ILB for the Cardinals.
4. Dansby likes being in Arizona. He is worthy of a better deal but probably wouldn’t be top money. The uncapped year may give him the chance to find out what teams want.
5. Boldin is done. If he stays he will demand big money/long contract. With Doucet and Breaston it would save some money to trade Boldin. They win without him and with some extra draft picks or FA the team can find other needs filled.
well done sir
1. I say it’s good. B-Train got out at the right time. He was never much of a run defender but he’d gotten extremely one dimensional over the past couple of years. He hung on a for a couple years as a situational pass rusher and now it’s time to go. Thanks Bert for leaving on your own terms.
2. Bad if Warner leaves. It’s good for Leinart and maybe the future of this team but for now I’ll take what we know over what we’re not quite sure of. I’m not ready for this run to end.
3. Good for us. Even if Carroll turns out to be a good coach, something I highly doubt, it’s going to take a while to turn that franchise around. They’re offensive line is a mess and they have no future at QB. That takes multiple years to fix and Carroll probably won’t last through the rebuild. That team will suck and he’ll get blamed, even though the real blame should be laid on Holmgren.
4. Unknown at this point. I don’t think one year of uncapped football will have a long lasting effect but it’s a problem that the NFL needs to fix before it becomes something permanent. No one wants to see the NFL turn into the MLB.
5. Bye bye Boldin, you were good for this team but now we need the picks that your trade will bring us. It’s been great buddy and I’ll always root for you but your days as a Cardinal are numbered.
Be careful....to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
Love The Idea
1) Berty B took off at a great time for both him and us. I’m sad to see him go, but mostly for nostalgic reasons. I have always been a fan of BB. However, since this thread is about what is good for the Cardinals, and not me personally (lol), this was a good thing. The Cards need to be able to stop the run while still presenting an effective pass rush. As Bez said previously, he’s just not good against the run and really doesn’t fit into the future of our D.
2) I’ll go out on a limb here and be the first to say that it’s good for the Cardinals if Warner retires. Personally, I want another full season out of him and to give him another shot. I love cheering for Kurt and don’t want that to end. However, we don’t need a question quarterback each season. We need a team leading, future QB. We need someone to be the future of this team and to step up and fill Warner’s shoes. If it isn’t Leinart and this isn’t the year for that, then I think Matty has worn out his welcome and needs to be on his way. I don’t see a reason to keep both Matt and Kurt another season. If we want to move forward with this team and get ready for our future QB, we need to either give Matty the shot not or get rid of him now. It’s just tim. I feel if we hold on for one more season, we’re going to be in bad shape next year at QB. The only argument I see that could convince me otherwise is my lack of knowledge regarding NEXT year’s Free Agent class?? If there are some solid QB’s we could go after, then maybe Warner staying one more year and getting a Free Agent would work.
3) Bad for us. How could it not be bad for us? We’ve seen what has happened to Seattle in previous years. They’ve turned to crap! Why would any Cardinals fan want to see a change in that? I’d rather they left things the way they were and continue to fester while we make them our doormat. The problem here is that Seattle is crap, but they are crap with some talent. A coach that can be a great motivator, and Carroll can do that, could ingest some heart into that talent. On top of that, people believe Carroll to be a winner. They believe that he brings a winning mentality. That kind of belief can also infuse life into this kind of team. I just don’t think we count the constant success of Carroll entirely on his players. A bad coach can destroy a good program very easily. He didn’t do that. The last thing I wanted to see here is a wild card and that is exactly what I consider him to be…he’s a wild card that has the potential to turn that franchise in the right direction. That equals bad for us.
4) Pay Dansby. Pay him to close the hole in the middle. With Berty gone and possibly Chike gone as well, I don’t want to lose another of our linebackers. Whether the others ae aging or not, and regardless of how poorly Chike played this season, it will still hurt us if we were to lose too many LB’s. Hayes is injury prone now a he gets up in age also. We’ve all agreed that we need to spend some draft picks on LB’s…but I dont’ want to replace our entire linebacking core! We need to keep some veteran leadership and Dansby is obviously the key component on of our LB’s. He’s also the top LB in the free agent class. Lose him and we open ourselves up for a hurting next season as we will not be able to replace him in the off-season.
5) Trade Boldin. It’s what’s best for the team. Trade him fo a defenive stud or for some draft picks, or a combination of the two. Either way, we have talented wide receivers to step in and we are gearing more towards a balanced offense. We can’t have our money tied up in two high-priced WR’s when it would be better spent stacking up our defense or even or offensive line.
one quick rebuttle to #3
They may have some talent but 90% of that talent is veteran talent and veterans normally don’t like the rah-rah speeches from a guy with ZERO skins on the wall. He’s been a mediocre NFL coach at best and that’s how 30-something players are going to view him.
Be careful....to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
I don’t like him, but the guy did have a winning record as an NFL head coach.
Look, I’m an upgrade as a head coach over Jim Mora Jr.
well that's a good point
His tenure was so short I had just about forgotten that Holgrem wasn’t he guy last year.
Be careful....to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
So, this was bad for us then?
Since Jim Mora Jr. was such a poor coach, wouldn’t we be better off had they kept him rather than change to PC?
yes it was bad for us
I also beleive they players didnt listen to Mora as evident in their effort the 2nd half of the season. Mora Jr had the pedigree (hence the Jr part of his name) but not the ability.
Never do card tricks for the group you play poker with.
good segment hech
heres my two cents
:Berry= could be GOOD for Cardinals IF they either bring in a dominant pass rusher FA and/or develop (successfully) Cody and Will/new draft picks, and get even more out of the position. I would guess initially there will be some growing pains, but long term we should be fine
:Warner=BAD
:Pete Carroll= BAD. could be GOOD for Cards but I am nervous b/c I think he will make them instantly better than Mora’s team. I hope I am wrong.
:Dansby= I can’t say either way. Dansby is talented, but I am not sure a blue chip draftee couldn’t fill his role?
:Q=GOOD. Again, Q is my favorite all time WR. Period. But I think we can fill more needs by trading him for picks, and Early looks even better than advertised.
http://undrafteds.com/
I know I am going to get cyber punched in the balls for this....
In a way I want Warner to go… Please dont mistake that for what it sounds like because I want him back bad and yet I understand the need to move on. If you step back and look at it here is what happens:
1 – Warner stays and we have the same team as last year, we essentially get one year older all the way around because it is the same system and a 75/25 chance of making the playoffs. We have less of a chance to see if Leinart can make it in this league and we HOPE LIKE CRAZY the front office can fill our MANY holes this offseason with people that can immediately make an impact.
2- Warner retires and we move to a more balance attack (what Whiz is silently building behind closed doors). This means its a 50/50 to make the playoffs next year. We are a year younger now not just because Leinart is younger but we have already shifted to the new rush first approach, we see what we have in Leinart and if he isnt the answer we have time to draft a good QB to go along with the other young talents on the team. We move on and maybe play 500 football for a season (likely getting us into the playoffs in our division) and then come out with a more consistent team relying on the run.
This is all being based on Rolle, Gandy, Dansby leaving. I also wonder if Warner retires that the Cards keep Boldin around to help Leinart transition or if they trade him for a pick to plug elsewhere, just an afterthought.
Never do card tricks for the group you play poker with.
didnt put my goods and bads
1 – Good, we were too old at LB. I also think Chike is gone unless he signs for 1 mil like Berry did last year
2 – Overall bad, I ahve come to realize thought I think for the teams future it is better he retire now than later.
3 – Bad. I know he failed in his last 2 stints and I know his rah rah attitude doesnt really work in the NFL but he also knows talent and with a slight attitude and approach adjustment could become a great NFL coach. I REALLY REALLY hope I am wrong.
4 – Bad until I see the wallet actually open
5 – Good. He is no longer needed and has given me headaches over the last 2 years. Thank you Boldin for your service up until 2008 but they are no longer required.
Never do card tricks for the group you play poker with.
I agree...
1. Its better he retired, time to shore up the defense.
2. Im actually hoping(yes i know…) that warner retires, it helps solidify matty as a starter and gives us a whole year to decide to keep him, then if not draft a qb. i hate the feeling of thinking “whats gunna happen next year?..”. every team needs a franchise qb(look at the rams), and its time for us to find out, time to rip the Band-Aid off and see what happens.
3. i dont understand ppl saying Carrol is gunna be a bad coach and he was spoiled with talent, ummm…isnt that the goal of every nfl team?? look at the chargers, crap full of talent but fails each year because of the coach, it can go both ways. I think hes gunna be a good coach, bad for us.
4. we need to re sign Rolle. If dansby is willing to stay for good money(not great) then keep him. Dockett is an amazing DT and i do believe in paying hard work but i heard he wants Haynesworth money, that is just ridiculous, trade him too.
5. I would hate to lose a talent like boldin but trade him and get the picks. draft LBs and OL.
4.
Mikey likes it
1. Bad, in that Bertrand is a very good influence on the young guys. Its good hes leaving on his terms, him coming here was the beginning of the end of the “same ol Cards” and he was a big contributer. Its never good when a great veteran leader leaves the team, he will be missed 2. BAD BAD BAD. How in the hell can Warner leaving be a good thing? Leinhart will not get this team into the playoffs, sorry but Ive had a taste of a winning team and I want more. Even if Warner can come back one more year and play I’d be happy. All the “give Lienhart a chance, turn the team into a run first team” talk is bull. We might as well rebuild too like all the other NFC west teams, we have a good opportunity next year to be in the after party again. Maybe a chance in next years draft for a QB 3. Bad, any chance to make any of the other NFC west teams better is bad, even tho it’ll take a couple years 4. Toss up. Now that M Bidwell is running the show maybe things might be different. I think michael got to like having a winning team when the Rattlers were the perrenial arena league champs. Who’s to say he might open Bills wallet and not only take care of the good f/a’s but maybe bring in some big talent. Not saying it’s ever going to happen but there might just be that chance. 5. I want Q to retire a Cardinal but I also can agree that the Cards can profit from a trade. Just like with Berry, Boldin has done so much to help this team with the way he plays and being a great veteran leader to the younger players
heres the thing
with our defense as porus as it is as hard as it is to admit is is going to be difficult to get back to the playoffs next year even with Warner (unless they sign some big name FAs).
Never do card tricks for the group you play poker with.
I agree
The offense is set up for Warner and the best chance to get back in the playoffs is with him. Theres no way in hell it’ll happen with Leinhart. I have alot of confidence the defensive problems will be addressed this offseason. I really want to believe that now that M Bidwell is running the show the Bidwell bank might open up and get the players they need
I disagree
The offense is a great one, but not set up specifically for Warner. The offense has been set up as a pass first offense and would be fine with any quarterback in the pocket that can make a quick decision and complete an open pass. Further, the running game has been developed to a sustainable point where we can begin to even out the pass:run ratio. This actually pushes the offense more towards a game management qb than a pass first qb. Warner is a pass first qb and always will be. He’s great and I’d love to have him for another season, but his retiring does force the envelope and will help the Cards in the long run. Sure, one more season of glory would be terrific. What happens then? Do we really keep Leinart on the bench for another full season? He is being paid far too much for me to see that happening. I don’t see us getting a quality QB in this draft either. This means, if Leinart isn’t our future, and we dont’ get a solid QB in this draft, we only have 2 choices: Throw a ton of money at a free agent qb in next year’s market, or draft a rookie Qb in next year’s draft as in immediate starter. Neither of those ideas inspires much confidence from me. This, especially, seems like a bad idea since Warner coming back will probably lead us to the playoffs and another low draft pick next year.
We need to know if Leinart is the futur QB or not. He still has the potential to be a decent QB if he can start making better, faster decisions. With all the talent around him, and most of that talent still young and effective, now is the time to give him the chance. If we do not, we are about to be the Rams or Seahawks in another year. We’ll be th team left stranded by an aging quarterback (a la Hasselbeck and Bulger) that is crippled from leaning on an inexperienced young quarterback. THEN we will find ourselves rebuilding and I’d rather not see that happening.
If Warner retires, and we line Matty up as the starter now, we save money we would’ve given to Kurt, and we solve our QB drama right away. We can then spend money and draft picks on defense. With a Quan trade, we can get a stud defender or draft picks to pick a late round qb as a back up developer.
by SundayBlitz on Jan 26, 2010 12:11 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs
So?
I basically agree with you. We should draft a QB or pick up one in FA despite what Warner does. BSP? No thank you, I have way less confidence in him than Leinart. But what if Leinart doesn’t work out? What route do we go? Another willy veteran or look to the draft and hope next season we can hold the 49’s at bay?
They are who we thought they were!
by Jesse Reynolds on Jan 27, 2010 8:19 AM MST up reply actions
You give it a year to work out or not if you're the GM
If he performs poorly, you address a replacement in the offseason with a FA signing or through the draft. If he performs very poorly, you use the 2nd stringer. Whatever you do, as a GM, you keep costs contained. From a fan’s perspective, you want everything — of course, right, you’re a fan. But, the team has to operate with a budget and right now and as the fans would have it, Leinart is being paid very good money to sit & learn. It’s time for the baby bird to leave its nest to see if it can fly. Even if Leinart is a bust, I cannot see this team doing worse than 8-8 even if that means he gets replaced during the season as a starter. Maybe it’s time we be some more rational fans for a change.
by LowcountryJoe on Jan 27, 2010 5:21 PM MST up reply actions
I like the write up Hevchev... Keep it up man.
If Warner retires I think we’ll still have an above average team but we really need to bring someone else in via FA or the draft to compete as I have said before.
Good riddance Berry, time to pass the torch onto some of our younger players. I lean towards this being a positive thing though as long as we find a viable replacement. I was not overly impressed with Brown’s performance in limited playing but hopefully he comes out swinging next year.
I’m indifferent about Seahawks new coach. We need to just play our game and worry about ourselves and we’ll be alright.
The verdict is still out on the Bidwells. They have shown in the last several years that they are willing to open up the pocket book and make moves to better the team. But I also think we all have the feeling that they might be pulling the wool over our eyes and eventually revert back to their same cheap ass ways. I don’t however think Whiz will stand for mediocracy and allow them to do that. He would walk before letting his reputation be tarnished because of lousy ownership.
And now to the million dolar question, the Q factor. I forget who said it on here but they explained how Q is perfect in the dump and dunk offense and I don’t think we will be much of a downfield passing team without Warner. Weighing that, Q would definitely allow us to be succesful because of his YAC. On the other hand, we have proven time and time again that we can win ball games in Q’s absence and we are very deep in the receiving core. We could really use him for some draft picks while he still has value and shore up our porous defense. Very difficult because I love Q and it would be great to see him retire a Card. I’m just glad the final determination does not rely on me because I really don’t know what I would do.
Really good segment again man. We seem to be bombarded with stats and news updates, which is fine and all, but you can get that info very easily through other outlets such as azcardinals.com and azcental etc. This article really opened up the possibility to express our opinions on Cards gossip which the site seems to have steered away from over the past year or so. Keep em coming bro
Who would win in a fight, Whisenhunt or a Hurricane?
Hold on, hold on, what if the Hurricanes name was Whisenhunt?
Daaaaaaaaaa Cards, Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards Da Cards!!!
It would be great to see Q retire a Red Bird
They are who we thought they were!
by Jesse Reynolds on Jan 24, 2010 12:31 PM MST up reply actions
+1,000
I have been saying to trade Q this year because it is what is best for the team.
Personally, I love Q and want him to stay a Cardinal until he retires. I don’t think he’s replaceable in terms of everythinghe brings to the table. Just catching the ball, we’ve got guys who can do that. His overall value, unfortunately, lays more in trade than anything.
It’s upsetting because he’s one of my favs
by SundayBlitz on Jan 26, 2010 12:13 PM MST up reply actions
Thanks for all the positive feedback guys.
I guess I’ll keep the segment. More to follow as news and rumors develop.
Life's too short. Be a fan. Orlando Magic, Arizona Cardinals,Tampa Bay Rays and of course "the U"! What a winning combo.
by hevchv on Jan 24, 2010 1:22 PM MST via mobile reply actions
My five cents worth
1) I think that Berry’s retirement is mostly bad in that I don’t have a whole lot of confidence in the ends outside of Campbell. With several holes to fill, this is just another position that needs to be addressed with the draft. Unless, of course, Bidwell open up the purse for some FA signing to address this particular need.
2) he’s not coming back, folks. Since he was given $19 million to play last season [the bonus has already beeen paid in full] he’ll make just $4 million in 2010 if he decides to play. And so far, he says he’s not motivated. This is mostly bad but I am not ready to hang myself from the shower rod over it. I have faith that this team will return as NFC West champions for 2010 [though, that doesn’t seem to say much]. Leinart will get the starting job and the team shall see what it finally has on its hands. Definitley expect the running game to be featured more than it had been. This might be a blessing in desguise, long-term, though not nearly as exciting. Dark cloud; silver lining!
3) the competition will do as it does; the team and, certainly the fans, cannot control for this. If the Cardinals owners, GM, and head coach get the players they need to comptete, what other teams do should make too much of a difference. Sure the team has to make adjustments but the focus should be on our own team and matching up against everyone that it plays, week after week.
4) I beleive that salary caps are bullshit. A team lives or dies (profits or loses) by it’s paying fanbase. Field a worth-watching product [with reasonable expendatures on players], make profits. Field shit, and you won’t make shit. As with any other contract, does the cost of a player meet or exceed the expected benefit that the player brings to a worth-watching product and, through extention, more revenue at the gate? If the answer is “Yes!”, you pay the cost. if the answer is, “No!” then you do not pay it. Will Dansby ask for an unreasonable level of compensation? If he does, the owner(s)/GM should let his ass walk. Free(er) market are ALWAYS good, in my not-so-humble opinion; they send signals to all the right places, for the right reasons, for the right consequences.
5) Q is a very good player but he is not content and probably has some ill feeling toward the organization. The WR position is a current position of surplus for this organization. Those two facts lend themselves to an obvious conclusion: he should be dealt for picks or a player (or players) that fill some need on this team. Since other teams know the situation, the Cardinals will probably lack the leverage in any deal to get what fans will think is a fair return. Unless there’s any team that any of you can think of that absolutely needs a WR more than the this team’s desire to get some kind of return. Dealing Q, because WR is what it is on this team, has to be a good.

by 




















