Boldin VS Fitzgerald 2010

Boldin - 40 / 546 / 5
Fitzgerald - 42 / 510 / 5

over 1 year ago sc464 6 comments 0 recs |

Comments

Fitz all the way

If Fitz can get nearly the same numbers WITHOUT a QB and playing on one leg the first 2 games there is no arguing who is better. Just saying.

Never do card tricks for the group you play poker with.

by sc464 on Nov 10, 2010 11:43 AM MST reply actions

whoops! Fitzgeralds TD's are at 4 not 5

Never do card tricks for the group you play poker with.

by sc464 on Nov 10, 2010 11:43 AM MST reply actions

Wow

That’s still surprising, I would not have guessed the numbers would be that close. I guess I don’t pay all that much information to Boldin anymore, but I thought he was killing it in Baltimore.

"When life gives you lemons, I say f**k the lemons and bail."

by SGM on Nov 10, 2010 12:06 PM MST reply actions

Surprising.

Lifelong Arizona Cardinals/Chicago Bears fan [I have always lived in Arizona, dad is from Chicago].

I can't stand fair-weather/bandwagon fans, stick with your team(s), throughout the good and the bad. And don't switch to whichever team wins the Super Bowl each year.

by JoeCB1991 on Nov 10, 2010 1:49 PM MST reply actions

I think Fitz's numbers would be higher if we had Joe Flacco from the beginning. Granted he's not amazing but he's better than Anderson.

by YoungCardsFanatic on Nov 10, 2010 5:30 PM MST reply actions

I like what I've seen from Flacco

He played very well in the second half of the Atlanta game, and he played well last year without many real offensive weapons except for dumping it off to Ray Rice.

Lifelong Arizona Cardinals/Chicago Bears fan [I have always lived in Arizona, dad is from Chicago].

I can't stand fair-weather/bandwagon fans, stick with your team(s), throughout the good and the bad. And don't switch to whichever team wins the Super Bowl each year.

by JoeCB1991 on Nov 15, 2010 2:52 PM MST up reply actions