Arizona Cardinals Shift Focus To Struggling Minnesota Vikings Team
There's little doubt that Ken Whisenhunt and the Arizona Cardinals were already shifting focus to Minnesota on their first practice after last Sunday's loss. For our sake, we'll say that the shift in focus begins today. The bitter taste of the last two losses still resides in the team and the fan's mouths respectively. How can the Cardinals wash that away and chalk up a win on Sunday?
Defeat the Minnesota Vikings -- that's how. The same Vikings that reached the NFC Championship game last season. The same Vikings that were one of the best teams in the NFL last season. The same Vikings that the Cardinals upset last season. It can be done again, considering that Minnesota is clearly not the same team. It began with another offseason filled with Favre-mania, and continued when he joined the team late in training camp. It hasn't dissipated even halfway through the season, as Favre's aging body became more battered when he was knocked out of last week's game against the Patriots.
Brett Favre, who tossed 33 touchdowns last season and threw a career high 107.2 passer rating, has looked like a 41-year old man so far this season. He's already eclipsed his interception total from 7 last season, to 11 this season. His 69.8 passer rating this year is a career low. To make matters worse, he fractured two bones in his ankle two weeks ago to go along with the jaw injury he received last week. Favre should never be counted out of starting at quarterback -- factoring that he holds the longest starts streak in league history -- but his chances to play the Cardinals has grown increasingly unlikely this Sunday.
That is where the Cardinals defense comes into play...
We discussed earlier this week that the Cardinals defensive play has improved this season. Playing a bruised and battered Favre would give them the edge. Playing his back up would be even better. Tarvaris Jackson would be the man leading the Vikings' offense should Favre sit out. He does little to strike fear in the eyes of opposing defenses. Count me as a fan that also isn't worried about his play. Yes, he is the same Jackson that threw four touchdowns against the Cardinals two seasons ago in a Minnesota victory. He's also the conservative-armed quarterback that owns a 58.8% completion and 78.6 passer rating. Beating Jackson would be less of a challenge for the defense then a limping Favre.
However in Minnesota, the quarterback isn't the only focus. A running back named Adrian Peterson poses as a problem for any defense, and has been a reason for their success the last two years. Peterson, who's been arguably the best running back in the league the last four seasons, has gained 970 total yards and 6 touchdowns in 2010. The Cardinals defense shutdown Peterson in front of a wild home crowd on Sunday Night Football last season, limiting him to just 19 yards on 13 carries. Obviously repeating that defensive performance is easier said than done, but at least we know it's possible. Peterson should and will be the defense's primary focus.
Another reason Minnesota was so successful last season was because of their dominant defensive play. With playmakers at all three levels, the Vikings were able to stifle opposing offenses en route to the NFC Championship game. However this season, even the defense has been middle of the road at best. It becomes a matter of whether or not the Cardinals can enforce their will against the Vikings.
As we've already found out, the Cardinals offense has been stagnant and inconsistent. It begins with the play at quarterback. The Max Hall experiment blew up in our faces and now Derek Anderson is back at the helms. He orchestrated a few impressive drives last week, but ultimately failed in the end when he threw the game-losing interception. This week, turnovers may be the least of Anderson's worries, as the Vikings defense is currently ranked 29th in the league with a -7 turnover differential and have only intercepted 6 passes this season. The Jared Allen-led pass rush hasn't been what it once was, as the Vikings defense had recorded a league low with 6 sacks in 2010.
Beanie Wells, assuming he plays, will need to be a big part of Sunday's game against Minnesota's defense. Incorporating Tim Hightower and LaRod Stephens-Howling into the offense will also be needed. The Cardinals defeated the Vikings last season because of a successful running game that wasn't afraid of Minnesota's defensive line.
It's difficult to pinpoint why the Vikings have faltered this season. The distractions of Brett Favre and the now departed Randy Moss haven't helped. It's not as if they are a terrible team. Their average point differential is only -2.2 this season. They have Pro Bowlers and playmakers on both sides of the ball as well. For the Cardinals to pull out a win in Minnesota on Sunday, it will take a big effort. After two straight losses, this is one win the Cardinals desperately need. I won't say a victory will be easy, but consider that the Cardinals usually play their best with their backs against the wall and when everyone's doubting them. So please rule the Cardinals out of this game NFL analysts -- we need this one.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thankfully for the offense
The Vikings D-Line has been dreadful this year.
"You've got to ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya, punk?"- Dirty Harry
Harvin might be out too
Heard he was limping pretty badly during practice.
Lifelong Arizona Cardinals/Chicago Bears fan [I have always lived in Arizona, dad is from Chicago].
I can't stand fair-weather/bandwagon fans, stick with your team(s), throughout the good and the bad. And don't switch to whichever team wins the Super Bowl each year.
by JoeCB1991 on Nov 5, 2010 1:12 PM MDT via mobile reply actions
Wow
So, if the only real receivers they have to worry about are Berrian and Camarillo, then the D should be able to stack the box and stop AP. Now, they just have to keep their eye on Shiancoe.
"When life gives you lemons, I say f**k the lemons and bail."
by SGM on Nov 5, 2010 1:47 PM MDT up reply actions
NFL.com is reporting that Percy Harvin was "extremely limited" in practice today,raising his chances of missing the game on Sunday
One less threat for the Cardinals.
Anderson has slowly gotten better
Heres to hoping he finally has that good game. D will do their part. If DA can play error free this is a very winnable game
I hope the Vikes are falling apart as much as their fans make out.
It will be tough going into the metrodome. Makes a handy excuse for starting Anderson over the rookie. Peterson alone makes them a dangerous team. With Hayes in the game maybe our run D will stiffen. Haggans being out could be a blessing in disguise. Will Davis should be speedier getting after Favre. I’d like to see Schofield get a shot or two at him as well. Once Favre starts getting pounded around he’s good for a mistake or two. If they go heavy against the run, as in all likelihood they will, I’d like to see some extra defensive linemen out there. The line up of Campbell, Dockett, Branch and either Robinson or Williams could get brutal.
Looks like Beanie will play but have to wonder how much and how effective he will be with the knee issues. As long as they can keep their hands on the ball I’m confident in the abilities of all our backs though. Expecting to see even more of LSH. And can we please get through one game without an interception?
Ho hum and yawn.
If the Cards give this game away in the same fashion as last week, I will not be surprised.
It seems apparent that this is the game plan, try and stay close but engineer a TO late, just in time to throw the game without looking too suspicious.
If the running game is working, throw passes into coverage. Do not make it obvious, but fail to take 3 points if it means a win. Do whatever it takes to let the game slip away in the 4th Quarter.
Better yet, manufacture an early blow out for Viking fans. They deserve some good news and we need a to grab a QB in the next draft with a high pick. A win would be disasterous for the Cardinals franchise.
by Arizona Retiree on Nov 6, 2010 12:12 AM MDT reply actions


























