| Sign Up | Google+

Need VS BPA or BPA VS Need



What are your thoughts

So my question is what is the better approach on the draft? Is drafting for need in the first 2 rounds then BPA the way to go or is drafting BPA in the first 2 rounds then need the way to go. In my opinion i would say BPA then need but in our case we might be able to do both this year. With the 2010 season approaching fast we have a lot of holes on defence which the saints and packers offence enjoyed showing us. In most of the mock drafts ive seen we either take OT or ILB in the first. In the mock draft i was apart of i took Brandon Spikes in the first and had the choice of Ciran Black a LT from LSU or the choice I took was Jason Fox the OT from Miami with a lot of promise till he had a knee surgery but i think he will be a great addition but should of tried to get him later. But the ? i have is need vs BPA. what our your thoughts

                                                                                                                                                                                                               

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Revenge of the Birds' (ROTB) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of ROTB's editors.

Recent FanPosts

View All Fan Posts

The Next FanPosts

There are 20 Comments. Load Now. Loading

Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.

C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read

R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next

Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read

Comment Settings

Live comment alert: Hide it!

Comments for this post are closed.

tracking_pixel_5341_tracker tracking_pixel_5351_tracker