Revenge Of The Birds Football 101: The Tampa 2 Defense
Every week at Revenge of the Birds, I'll go over a different football term/scheme/position in an effort to provide the community with a better understanding of the game we all know and love. Last week the draft landed on a Friday so I decided to push this segment back one week. By demand, this week we'll discuss a popular defensive scheme known as the Tampa 2 defense. Every year we hear sportscasters talk about the Tampa 2 but rarely do we hear what exactly it is. It originated in 1975 by the Pittsburgh Steelerswhen Jack Lambert was the inside linebacker for the Steelers defense. The name however, originated some 20 years later.
The phrase "Tampa 2" obviously originated from the Tampa Bay Buccaneers when Tony Dungy was the head coach from the mid 1990's through the early 2000's. Monte Kiffen was the defensive coordinator through that time as well, and helped master the formation. Tony Dungy admittedly said he used the 1975 Steelers scheme, and brought it with him to the Bucs when he was hired. Fortunately for Dungy, he had the defensive personel to run such a defense.
Before discussing the Tampa 2 defense, we should explain the Cover 2 defense first. The Cover 2 defense features two cornerbacks and two safeties. The cornerbacks' job is to jam their receivers coming off the line, and slow them before they can reach the safety. Instead of staying stride-for-stride with the receiver like the Man defense, the cornerback will sit tight in their zone, generally 10 yards off the line of scrimmage. The safeties are responsible for anything that gets past the linebackers or corners. The outside linebackers also have zones, covering the field in between the line of scrimmage and the cornerbacks. One of the biggest weaknesses to the Cover 2 defense is the middle of the field. Since the middle linebackers'(MIKE) duty is to stop the run, the middle of the field can be exploited and thus allow big plays and yardage. That's where the Tampa 2 defense comes into effect.
The Tampa 2 modified the Cover 2 by inserting a fast inside linebacker or MIKE, in the middle of the defense. Their job was to quickly back pedal and cover up to 11 yards of ground to cover the middle of the field. This change vastly eliminated the weakness of the Cover 2 and was extremely difficult to stop when Dungy brought it back in 1996. Why don't more teams use this great defense you ask? Without the right personnel, the defense will fail.
The Tampa 2 requires very quick defensive ends that will pressure the quarterback by winning their one on one battles off the edge. The defensive tackles must also be fast but are depended on to stop the run as well. The defensive line must work very well together and are the primary source for generating pressure to the quarterback. If they fail to do that, the defense will not work. One common misconception of the Tampa 2 is that defenses cannot blitz to avoid leaving holes in the defense. This is not true as every NFL defense MUST blitz. If they don't, quarterbacks like Peyton Manning and Tom Bradywill eat them alive. In Tampa Bay, Dungy had Simeon Rice on the outside and Warren Sapp as the defensive tackle - two prototypical defensive lineman for that defense.
The linebackers in the Tampa 2 must also be very athletic and possess great quickness. The outside linebackers should be built for coverage and solid tackling also. The most important part of the scheme however, is the inside linebacker. They are usually undersized and very fast. Typically, the Tampa 2's biggest weakness remains the middle of the field because most teams don't have the ideal MIKE linebacker. Dungy had Derrick Brooks. He was small but fast and provided great tackling for the Bucs.
The secondary is generally physical with receivers. The cornerbacks should be built to stop the run since they will receive more runs heading in their direction. The Tampa 2 also needs a hard-hitting strong safety for an intimidation factor. They are responsible for laying the wood on receivers and running backs streaking over the middle. John Lynch was the perfect strong safety for Tampa Bay, and Ronde Barber was the ideal tackling cornerback as well.
The purpose of the Tampa 2 is to eliminate big plays from opposing offenses and force them into short dump-off passes. The defense particularly excelled in late-game situations when the opposing team needed to score quickly, but struggled to do so. As you can see from the chart above(courtesy of ESPN), there is little room for the quarterback to throw to due to the amount of zones that were occupied. Obviously one of the biggest factors for a successful Tampa 2 is the speed of the defense. The entire defense must be fast and very good at tackling. Teams can exploit this defense however, by running up the middle effectively. A very good slot receiver or fast tight end will also have big games against the Tampa 2 since the linebackers are generally not quick enough to cover them. More and more the Tampa 2 defense is being used by the NFL with most teams adding their own twists.
Football Term of the Week: Check off
A check off, or audible, is used by the quarterback of the offense. The check off is usually called when the quarterback has the chance to study the opposing defense's formation. The result is a new play being called at the line of scrimmage in order to catch the defense off guard.
If there are any specific schemes, formations, positions, terms, or plays that you'd like explained, list them in the comment section below.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
One other comment
As I understand it, the Tampa 2 requires very high energy and most defenses running it tend to ware down in the fourth quarter so you need good depth to spell guys.
by Birdman from Mesa on Apr 30, 2010 4:41 PM MDT reply actions
Good point
That tends to get overlooked but considering how much running and dropping coverage the team does, its true.
What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds
Who even runs the Tampa Two anymore?
Vikings, I think Raheem brought it back when he kicked Jim Bates out, and… ? [i]Maybe[/i] the Giants this year?
Anyways, since I’m going to go ahead and assume you like looking up formation-related information, you should do one of these on Jim Bates’s defense. It’s pretty unique and, in my opinion, interesting.
The Bears run some kind of Cover Two.
Lifelong Arizona Cardinals/Chicago Bears fan.
I can't stand fair-weather/bandwagon fans, stick with your team, throughout the good and the bad.
Colts?
I don’t really follow the Colts but this does sound like them with Mathis and Freeney. Not to mention Dungy’s hand there.
The Colts do
Bears and vikings do. The Lions, Bills, and Chiefs have recently too.
What? I didn't break it, I was just testing its durability, and then I placed it in the woods becuase it's made out of wood and I just thought he should be with his family.
Revenge of the Birds
The Bears and Vikings do
The Bears run the same exact version of the Tampa 2, the Vikings modified it a little and is a little more of a standard Cover 2.
Indianapolis abandoned its Tamp 2 Defense before last season. When Dungy retired, he took the defensive scheme with him. Indy now plays a very aggressive and heavy blitz style of defense.
"No player is greater than a team."
-Vince Lombardi
Giants
It’s rumored the Giants might run a Tampa 2, but considering our MLB are unproven rookies, I’m fairly certain that Fewell is sticking with our standard 4-3. He’s made it clear that he’ll run whatever formation will fit best with the personell, and simply put: the Giants don’t have the linebackers to run a Tampa 2.
You seem to have the front 4
for it, but I agree about the inexperience of your MLB, that would be a lot to put on him as an unproven rookie.
another good thing about the tampa 2 personnel wise is that cornerbacks tend to last much longer career wise
since they don’t have to cover receivers one on one, and actually play closer to the line, the corners don’t need elite speed (which is why ronde barber has been playing corner for the last 50 years it seems).
the bears made brian urlacher a house hold name because of the tampa 2
A safety out of collage put on some weight and absolutely owned the middle in this d
The Devil Birds just got cha
by DaCards on Apr 30, 2010 9:41 PM MDT via mobile reply actions
That
and Urlacher’s ability. His speed and athleticism are ideal for the scheme. He did play some OLB at New Mexico as well.
This isn't a base D, it's a scheme, right?
It seems like, in the 3-4, a modified Tampa 2 would be more effective. More linebackers means more speed, and gives you more options with a 4-man rush. This would add an element of confusion on the offensive side, wouldn’t it? Trying to figure out where the 4th guy is going to come from, and which LB will cover where — though ultimately the same area will be covered irregardless…
The only reason I am inquiring this direction is, well, we run a 3-4, but the Bills & Chiefs comment (because they’re both trying to convert to a 3-4) made me wonder.
3-4
You’re right, 3-4 defenses do run the Tampa 2 and have been having success at it. Because the game is getting smarter with x’s and o’s, and the athletes are getting better; the 3-4 allows more flexibility.
They are who we thought they were!
by Jesse Reynolds on May 1, 2010 3:33 AM MDT up reply actions
Sort of
In a cover 2, it is typically run out of a 4-3 alignment. The major difference, as alluded to throughout the article and comments, is it’s a giant zone coverage defense. You’ve got 7 guys playing zone and not allowing anything deep so it can be hell for the QB to find anything open downfield in it (other than over the middle). Great defense for protecting leads and avoiding big plays, and will create a lot of turnovers if the QB gets impatient and tries to force the issue.
A 3-4, in addtion to being run out of a difference base (obviously) is designed to create as much pressure on the QB as possible, largely by getting the OLB’s into very favorable match-ups.
In general (say that because a lot of teams will throw out all kinds of looks) a cover 2 will create more interceptions (remember the Tampa vs Oakland Superbowl), whereas a 3-4 will keep the blitz coming (hence the nickname “blitzburg”) and can create interceptions but relies mostly on sacks and constant pressure. Kind of interesting that Pittsburgh helped to popularize both schemes.
took me a second
to figure out what you meant by the Bills and Chiefs. I do know the Bills are converting their D to a 3-4 from a cover 2, I thought the Chiefs already ran a 3-4 but as the Cardinals are the only team I follow closely I won’t claim any accuracy to that thought.
Buffalo’s planned conversion really makes me wonder why they didn’t go with Williams at #9, but if they don’t have a true NT they’ll find out the hard way the value of it in a 3-4.
Great article
A lot of people like the Tampa 2 and because it also has name recognition many people think it’s better than it really is. Obviously, with HoF talent it will succeed, as almost any D with HoF talent would… But there are more weaknesses than just running up the middle, ie screen passes (especially bubble screens), WR overloads (like the 4 WR set in the picture) with routes designed to stretch defenders in their zone, and play-action passes (which depend on a successful run game) because they “freeze” up the LB’s just enough to create coverage holes.
I think in the redzone is when it’s most effective because of the space limitations. It compacts it and makes for a very difficult time running or passing because LB and DB drop backs aren’t as deep.
They are who we thought they were!
thank you
i never understood the term when i was in comentary what tampa 2 meant but now i do thanks and keep up the good work





















