Cardinals Vs. Rams: Five Negatives From The 19-13 Win
The Arizona Cardinals broke their six game losing streak yesterday (and their winless streak while wearing their alternate black uniforms) with a narrow victory over the St. Louis Rams. However, the game not only took until overtime for the Cards to pull it out, but there was quite a bit of luck involved. A poor Rams coaching decision to go for it on fourth down, a blocked field goal and a spectacular 99-yard punt return all contributed to the revitalization of the Red Birds.
Other than those few fortunate plays, the game was rather ugly. The defense played decently, but keep in mind, they were going up against the 1-6 Rams. Let's take a look at five of the negatives from their week nine matchup.
Time of Possession:
The T.O.P. was skewed in the Rams' favor throughout the game, especially in the first half. Arizona was only able to run 19 plays in the fist 30 minutes of the game, rendering them almost entirely ineffective. In those 19 plays, they were only able to tally three total points. They also only had just under 10 minutes worth of offense, compared to the Rams' 20 minutes in the first half. By the time the game was over, St. Louis had the ball for 37 minutes, compared to 25 minutes for the Cards. Mainly, this fault in the Cardinals gameplan can be attributed to the...
Lack of a Run Game:
The Cardinals were downright awful in the ground game against the Rams. This is especially ironic considering the Rams had the worst rush defense in the league coming into this game. Beanie Wells had seven carries in the first half for only two yards and ended the game with ten carries for 20 yards. John Skelton was the leading rusher on the team, gaining 38 yards on four attempts.
Beanie's latest injury is highly noticeable. He is unable to make the cuts we are accustomed to seeing him make and he doesn't have the 'punch' that he normally does. On top of that, the offensive line was not able to get a push throughout the day. This was especially evident when Arizona was unable to convert a 3rd and one and was forced to punt.
Safety Issues:
Normally this headline might involve me criticizing the play of Adrian Wilson/Kerry Rhodes/Rashad Johnson, but in terms of yesterday's game, I am not talking about those safeties. I am talking about the two consecutive safeties that the Cardinals gave up in the third quarter. Rams punter Donnie Jones was able to pin the Cardinals deep and near their own end zone three times during the third period and ultimately helped his team score four points because of his kicks.
John Skelton was sacked in the end zone on the first one and collected an intentional grounding penalty on his second gaffe. If you want to relive the memories, just click here. The first one can be attributed to the lack of an offensive line, but the second safety is totally on Skelton's shoulders. The line of scrimmage was at the nine yard line and he scrambled all the way back into the end zone. He needed to just get rid of the ball, but his inexperience really showed in that situation.
Stopping Steven Jackson:
Jackson ran through the Cardinals' defense, gashing through the defensive line on several occasions to keep the Rams' drives alive and the clock running. He ended the day with 29 carries for 130 yards, a 4.5 yard average. His hard running helped the Rams open up the deep ball, much like Ray Rice was able to do for the Ravens last week.
Luckily for the Cardinals, the Rams are not the Ravens. They were able to win the game and hold the Rams to zero touchdowns, despite their repeated attempts at burning the Cardinals with the long pass. Arizona will have to shore up their run defense so that they can leave their safeties deep to prevent any further major gashes.
Injuries:
There are only a couple of injuries to report for the Cardinals, but one of them required hospitalization. Michael Adams made a great tackle during the fourth quarter, but was taken away on the cart due to an apparent head injury. From the hospital, he reassured everyone via Twitter that he was doing alright and that he just wanted to get out of there, but that they were holding him as a precaution. It was definitely a relief to read that.
Another injury that was noticeable was that of Todd Heap's hamstring. He was listed as questionable in the days leading up to the game, but was made active for the game prior to kickoff. However, we failed to see Heap throughout the duration of the game, with Jim Dray and Jeff King taking all of the snaps at the tight end position. Hopefully Heap can return soon, as he adds an entire new dimension to the offense that the team has not had for some weeks now.
What were the negatives for you, fans? What do you think the Cardinals need to improve upon in order to get a winning streak going?
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Heap was on the field for atleast one play
by Drullin'OverDaCards on Nov 7, 2011 9:29 AM MST reply actions
Just confirmed with Darren Urban
Heap did not come in for a single play yesterday.
by Tyler Nickel on Nov 7, 2011 12:58 PM MST up reply actions
Heard on Burns and Gambo
Todd Heap was on for an interview (every monday) he said he was active but that he was for emergency use. He had the green light to play but told the coaches he probably shouldn’t go for fear of tearing his hammy.
Well - let's not make this into a bigger deal than it is - but since it is a pet peeve of mine to be told I am wrong when I am right
Unless some other massive human being was wearing number 86 for the Cardinals – Todd Heap was on the field for at least one play. It is the play just after PP made the great interception. On first and ten from the 10 yard line with 0:22 left in the first quarter, Todd Heap lines up in a tight slot position to the left of Levi Brown and runs short crossing pattern with Fitz.
Verifed on NFL rewind by me.
BTW NFL rewind is really pretty cool if you are a crazy football fan – for $19.99 you can watch the replay of every single regular season game streaming to you computer in hd commercial free with all the gaps taken out – you can watch a game in about 40 minutes.
by Drullin'OverDaCards on Nov 7, 2011 3:58 PM MST up reply actions
give them some credit...
Chad Pennington made the comment that they outplayed their coaching. The rams lit up New Orleans just last week. Bradford was back and looked pretty good. Jackson is an animal. The rams to many were picked to win the division….remember? The cards held when they needed to. The guys on the field played pretty well. PP was the victim of a couple of more than questionable calls, and the guys outplayed their coaching. The negatives this game came from poor pass protection, dropped passes, poor route running and poor play calling. The fortunate aspects of the game are part of the game. Tyler, I am not sure if you have ever coached before, but the Rams made the right call in going for it on 4th down. You play the percentages and play for the win. The cards had not been able to stop steven jackson all day. Its fourth and less than 1 with just less than 2 minutes. If they get the first down, the game is all but over. They can run the clock down and leave with a last second field goal for the W. The ravens did the same thing in Baltimore last week and they won. Granted the drive was extended on a terrible PI call, but still harbaugh went for it and played the percentages. I just wish that Wiz would play the young recievers. Roberts is terrible. Stucky…please! No run game because Larod playing too much. Smith would do so much better. The D is getting much better. Acho is going to be a stud.
"I just wish that Wiz would play the young recievers. Roberts is terrible."
This is as contradictory statement as you can make, seeing how Roberts IS a young receiver.
That being said, I’m pretty sure you’re talking about DeMarco Sampson. I only remember seeing him in 1 regular season game, but I really would like to see him on the field more. But he has to stay healthy.
Faith Focus Finish
Uh yeah...
I was referring to Demarco and Steven Williams. Anyone remember him? The guy that tore it up last year in pre-season, and this pre-season also? Because he was a rook, and made some mistakes, Wiz wont play him. Instead, they play Stuckey and Roberts who couldnt catch a cold. Taylor played instead of Smith because Taylor is a vet. And I dont mean animal Dr.
Roberts looks like he is afraid to catch the ball for fear of getting killed. This offense is designed with a lot of stuff over the middle. Roberts is not that guy. Breaston was pretty damn good. Roberts is not as tough as say…Wes Welker. Put Doucet in the slot and get one of the big guys on the outside to stretch the field and take that double away from Fitz! Roberts and Early strike no fear in anyone. At least the TEs are getting some play and producing. They would be even better if someone (aka Kolb) could hit a wide open House running down the seam uncovered!
Good Article
1) Only three trips to the Red Zone in Regulation. The first time the Cards passed twice for zero yards and ran once for one yard before kicking a FG (weak). The second time the Cards had the ball on the Twenty with a 4th and one yard for a first and they elect to kick a FG (weak). The third time the Cards ran for four yards and a first down before Skelton threw a strike to Larry Fitzgerald in the End Zone (strong).
2) Spotty play by the Defense in the first half allowing three field goals and multiple penalties.
3) Play calling: The Rams played as if they knew what the Cards would call. Beanie was not happy with 2yds./carry and Skelton kept the Cards in the game by becoming the leading rusher through broken plays (weak).
4) O line spotty play, Skelton had little time or protection on the majority of plays. They made the Rams look like the 49ers while opening the doors for the two safetys and I don’t know how many sacks. Skelton was running to survive.
5) HC had no confidence in his players and the Cardinals talent was being manipulated in an effort to avoid a loss. Calias Cambell and Patrick Peterson saved Whiz’s job and boosted team confidence. (Whiz is still the weak link on the Cardinals team and a stumbling block to success.)
A guy who comments on his ex-team's performance in a game against a team that isn't his own new team.
(weak)
Faith Focus Finish
I'm trying to be polite.
The Niners spoke volumes on the field, as to why they are my team.
I’ll keep my comments to the Arizona Cardinals because I happen to live in Arizona and would like to see a local team make good. I’m a fan of Football and I love good coaching at any level. I loath poor coaching.
This is an open board, so weak or not, put up your best argument for your boy Whiz and change my mind about his lack of skills at Offense, Defense and player issues.
Disagree with 5
If your defense has been stopping them all day, you have faith in your D when your offense arrives at 4th-and-whatever. In a low-scoring game marred by incompetent offenses, whoever makes the fewest mistakes typically wins.
Understand your prospective
In my opinion it would have been a solid boost for the Offense had the first down been made. It would have given Fitz and Skelton an opportunity for the go ahead score. If you have faith in the D you go for the first down play.
Regarding the running game:
I wasn’t paying too much attention at the time, but I’m wondering if the struggles the running game had yesterday were because the Shermanator was sidelined. I know that Beanie is playing injured right now and doesn’t have the same explosion we’ve seen this year, but he did go for 88 yards and a TD against a much better Baltimore defense last week. The only thing that changed this week was the Juggernaut coming back (and possibly the Rams selling out against the run). I hate to say it, because I absolutely love the idea of the Juggernaut, and he seems like an awesome teammate and person, but he’s just not that good at creating holes for the running game.
Faith Focus Finish
That explains the sets where there was a FB
But what about single back plays? I think it is more about poor O-Line play and Beanie’s injury than anything else. You could be right about the Shermanator vs. Mauia point, though.
I also thought this
I do think that may have had somethin to do with it as well. I bet if we had Sherman in, smith would’ve got a few chances to run.
by cgcardzfan on Nov 7, 2011 1:24 PM MST via mobile up reply actions
Again, I didn't watch the FB position too carefully.
But Beanie had only 10 carries. How many of those we’re single back plays vs. with a FB?
Faith Focus Finish
I ahree with your point
But there is no way a FB impacts every running play as much as that. They aren’t in on enough plays for it to be Sherman out with an injury being the problem. The line didn’t have the best game and Beanie was looking not so good to say the least.
Most definatly...
look back at the ravens game. Beanie was popping to the outside and had some decent runs up the middle. That was because of the blocking. The shermanator has been a huge factor.
The biggest reason for our lack of offense in the 1st
Was dropped passes (especially on 3rd down) and the run getting stuffed every play and even some tackled for losses.
by cgcardzfan on Nov 7, 2011 1:25 PM MST via mobile reply actions

by 
























