Arizona Cardinals Week 15 Bonehead Play - AZ Playcall and Refs
I don't want to steal the focus of this article from what it is for, selecting and debating the bonehead play that took place during the game and highlighting what went wrong or who messed up. But this week I do want to put a little bit of emphasis on how bad the referee's were during this game. The biggest bonehead call was in the 4th Quarter when the Ref's called the fumbled ball dead after O'Brien Schofield's second sack (back-to-back). The ball should have remained live as it rolled on the ground at the five yard line and was recovered by Calias Campbell. If it would have remained live CC93 would have returned the ball for a touchdown, which would also have been the game winning points.
There are a lot of games in which we all feel that the ref's miss something big, and I know the argument that "they could throw a flag on every play", but in this week 15 game I saw multiple blatant holds from the Cleveland Offensive Lineman and only one was called against Cleveland throughout the game. There were two very big Pass Interference calls that were missed against Cleveland where a Cleveland defender made multiple tugs at Early Doucet's jersey and had his left arm wrapped around Doucet way down the field. When the ball was thrown to Doucet the defender was able to knock the ball away, no flag thrown and Arizona had to punt, again. I don't know what these ref's were watching out there.Though inept at their jobs, at least it was pretty consistent because they also made the wrong call on a big Arizona PI play. The ref was standing on the sideline staring at Adrian Wilson when he hit WR Little in the back and took him out of the game for a few plays, but didn't throw the flag. That was a beautiful hit, but honestly should have been called for PI because Wilson was making contact with the receiver (more like laying the wood) before the ball was in his hands.
More after the jump!
At the end of the game Cleveland did have nine penalties for 74 yards, and Arizona had two for 13, but due to the lack of holding calls against the Cleveland Offensive Line it made Seneca Wallace look like more of a stud-mobile Quarterback than he is, and it made the Arizona Defense look like they couldn't get the job done. The lack of holding calls is very frustrating to me because the Defense has been on a sack frenzy with back to back weeks of five sacks with five defenders against good O-Lines and this week they were having issues. I know the issues were partly due to Wallace being mobile and mobile QB's always give AZ fits, and Cleveland has a pretty good O-Line, but it has to be said that it is also because the Ref's were too busy watching Wallace move around in the pocket and not watching Acho and Campbell get held.
Now to the Bonehead AZ playcall. It goes back to the first and goal at the five yard line after Campbell's fumble recovery. Whiz and Miller call a shuttle pass to LaRod Stephens-Howling from the shotgun formation, but it's the same playcall that worked two weeks ago with Doucet and the defense sniffs it out. Luckily, John Skelton keeps the ball and runs to the side trying to extend the broken play, but then ends up losing six yards in the process giving up another sack rather than throwing the ball away. The next two play calls are additional bad play calls and passes; first incomplete to Doucet, the second to Taylor who is tackled for a four yard loss backing up Feely to kick at the 15 instead of the 5. I know the run was hampered all day, but at 1st and goal at the five, you give it a try.
Sorry to rant this week, but am I right? Off base? Was there a different bonehead play you had in mind?
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
on 1st and goal at the 5, run run run
Then use play action. Or throw it up to Fitz. Or…do anything other than what we did….
I think
You got it right. I don’t have an issue with the play calling since the coaches were clearly trying to keep the Browns D off balance and didn’t work there. Take the good with the bad. But the initial incorrect call on the field hurt and could have cost us the game.
by defense_dad on Dec 20, 2011 11:45 AM MST via iPhone app reply actions
Completely agree
Bad play call, bad execution, bad decision to not throw the ball away. We should have put 7 on the board with that field position. At least we won though
Follow me on Twitter at @AlexDavidson68
Browns red zone defense is actually pretty stout.
How many times have the Cardinals opponents walked away thinking the same thing?
I remember one drive that Cleveland had, went down to 3rd and 1 in their own territory
the defense stopped them, with the ball clearly short of the first down yard line, and they would’ve had to punt, but the ref picks the ball up and places it exactly where it needed to be to get the first down.
by crisco219 on Dec 20, 2011 5:00 PM MST reply actions 2 recs
I got up to grab a beer assuming it was a punt
Worst tasting beer of the game…
by Jesse Reynolds on Dec 20, 2011 11:24 PM MST up reply actions
I thought they got the call wrong on the fumble when they changed it.
It looked more like Wallace’s wrist / forearm hit before his hand did. If they had ruled that his arm had made contact first then it would not have been a fumble. It was overturned only because they determined that it was the back of his hand that struck the ground first.
I also thought they botched the call when they changed Doucet’s reception to an incompletion. He clearly had control and two feet down. He was moving after the catch when hit. I guess there is a lot of wiggle room in the phrase “football move”.
yeah i thought that was down, not a fumble...
but i thought doucets play was an incomplete pass as i didnt see a football move, he got the ball then hit and it came out, but phew, at least we got the win!!
by CardsRepInChile on Dec 20, 2011 7:36 PM MST up reply actions
That gets right to the point of what exactly constitutes a "football move".
This is what the rulebook states;
“any act common to the game (i.e. maintaining control long enough to pitch it, pass it, advance with it, or avoid or ward off an opponent, etc.).”
So pretty much anything once you’ve caught the ball. I can only conclude that the official determined that Doucet was incapable of avoiding an opponent. It appeared to me that he was in the process of advancing the ball when he was struck. If that play happens at 2:01 Shurmer would have had a tough choice to make since it was called a catch on the field. The replay official chances nothing.
Rulebook note #1
With regard to the “football move”
“It is not necessary that he commit such an act, provided that he maintains control long enough to do so.”
I thought Doucet’s pass was complete since he took two steps and had the ball secured, but good point I don’t know where the “football move” took place. I do think he then fumbled when the defenders helmet hit the ball. The play should have been called as a catch, fumble out of bounds and 1st down AZ.
It’s interesting to me the different interpretations of a catch this year. We’ve seen Richard Marshall catch an INT and have it ruled incomplete because the ball moved a half inch, but then watch the replay of some WR or INT catches later in the year and see the same type of movement and the ball is ruled as a catch. I’m not saying the Ref’s are out to get us or anything, but it becomes more and more apparent to me that each ref crew has their own interpretations and items that they like to pay the most attention to. It seems that the Card’s have just had some bad ref’s this year.
Section 103, Row 19
In all fairness
the same crews have blown a lot of calls that could have gone against us. With so much available replay it’s just easy to see what the officials miss.
Bonehead play of the game was boneheaded for both teams
Skelton threw a pick targeted at Doucet on the left side with Andre Roberts standing wide open on the right hashmark with no one within 20 yards. The Browns screwed up by misaligning, having too many men on the field to correct the formation, and keeping Sheldon Brown on the sidelines for that play. Brown would have been the field corner in charge of Roberts.
by cardinalbrown on Dec 20, 2011 9:55 PM MST reply actions 2 recs
That's a good one too
Skelton throwing the INT against 10 men on the field. Both teams earn “D’uh” honors for that one.
Section 103, Row 19

by 
























