Beanie Wells Or Marshawn Lynch: Which RB Would You Pick For Your Team?
In his press session on Thursday after practice, Arizona Cardinals head coach Ken Whisenhunt noted how similar seasons that Beanie Wells and Seattle Seahawks running back Marshawn Lynch have had. If you have been following the season, you would know that Lynch has been one of the best backs in the game this season, particularly in the second half of the season, while Beanie had a record-breaking week and has played well while battling through a knee injury.
Yet when you put of their numbers side-by-side, they really do seem very similar. Take a look at some of them after the jump and decide which of the two you would choose for your team.
First, the total season stats:
Beanie Wells: 14 games (missing one due to a hamstring injury), 245 carries, 1047 yards, 4.3 yards per carry and 10 touchdowns.
Marshawn Lynch: 14 games (missing one with a back injury), 266 carries, 1118 yards, 4.2 yards per carry and 12 TDs.
Beanie started strongly, with games of 90, 93 and 140 yards before he battled a knee injury. His biggest game was 228 yards against the Rams in Week 12. Only one other time all season did he amass more than 80 yards in a game.
Lynch started more slowly and has been very strong late in the season. He has gained 100+ yards in six of his last eight games, including against the 49ers, who had not allowed a back to get 100 yards in a game in over two seasons. He was the first to rush for a TD against the 49ers this season.
Both backs have been marked with inconsistencies. Lynch started his career with two 1000+ yard seasons with the Buffalo Bills, but rushed for only 450 in 2009 and a combined 737 in 2010. Wells' rookie year was fine, as he led his team in rushing with 793 while splitting carries with Tim Hightower. His 2010 campaign was a struggle, as he had knee surgery and never looked right. He gained only 397 and averaged only 3.4 yards per carry.
Lynch is known to be one of the most punishing backs in the league and at making defenders miss by running through and over them. Beanie has more elusiveness and a great stiffarm, but before this season was considered more of a finesse player. This year he has been doling out punishment.
According to PFF, Lynch has gained 671 of his yards after contact, an average of 2.5 per carry. Beanie is right with him with 648 yards and 2.6 yards per carry after contact. The difference is that Lynch has caused 50 missed tackles to Beanie's 24 on the season.
The two are built differently. Lynch is 5-11, 215 pounds. Beanie is bigger, at 6-2, 229.
Marshawn is two years older at 25 years old and five years in the league. Beanie is 23 with three years.
Lynch was clocked at the NFL combine with a 4.36 second 40 time. Beanie was clocked at 4.46 at his Pro Day.
If you had to make a choice, who would be your pick?
Being the type of back that Lynch is -- a guy that runs through defenders, you wonder how long he can keep it up. The shelf life for backs like that is short. Just look at Brandon Jacobs and Marion Barber. He does have speed, but he does not use elusiveness.
Beanie has both, but has the knock of being injury prone. He has had one knee surgery and may need another this offseason. But he is two years younger, which is huge when it comes to running backs in the NFL.
It really looks like you won't be sorry with either one, but if all things are equal, I go with Wells for one reason -- his age. Both are physical, both have come back from disappointing seasons. The one thing that Beanie has on Lynch is youth.
It will be interesting to see five years from now how the two backs have fared. I imagine that they will look very similar.
We invite you to follow Revenge of the Birds on Twitter at @revengeofbirds and like us on Facebook
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
man....marshawn's a
Flat out beast ,even tho im a hommer I gota go with Lynch, he’s so relentless. And it’s cause of him that Seattle even had a small shot at the postseason, I luv Beanie but just saying..p.s sorry for the double post my phone is sensitive lol, happy Friday
:)
by tucson cards fan on Dec 30, 2011 8:49 AM MST via mobile reply actions
Is Lynch in a contract year?
I thought I read that somewhere. A lot of guys seem to have their best year when they are playing for a new contract
by Redbird Nation #1 on Dec 30, 2011 9:28 AM MST reply actions
He is
That’s a great point. Will be interesting to see his production next season after a new deal.
Like the Cardinals? Revenge of the Birds is where to go.
Like Arizona Sports in general? SB Nation Arizona is where you'll get it all.
Follow me on Twitter! @senorjessroot
by Jess Root on Dec 30, 2011 9:55 AM MST via Android app up reply actions
tough question
can’t really say.
by fansincejakenrob on Dec 30, 2011 10:48 AM MST via Android app reply actions
Beanie matched Lynch in production with that gimped out knee of his.
Have to think that if he was healthy all season he would have out performed him. Have to wonder if he can make it through a full season without getting injured again. That’s the conundrum with Beanie Wells. At least the Cardinals have Ryan Williams to hedge the bet next season.
I agree - it's about age
If we’re talking “starting a team” you have to go with Wells. The drop-off age for RBs is ~30, so by the time your “new” team is hitting its stride, Lynch would be in his late 20’s and starting to drop off whereas Wells would be theoretically still in his prime. If you ask which RB you’d want on a team that’s building for a playoff push, that’s different – I think Lynch is probably more reliable at this point in his production and has more experience.
For example, if you’re asking which one a team like the Patriots or Packers would want, I’d say Lynch. If you’re asking which one the Panthers or Redskins would want, I’d say Wells. Since we’re probably closer to the Panthers than the Patriots at this point, I think Wells is better for this team right now.
I give Lynch the edge because he just holds up better throughout the season
I’d take Beanie on his best day over Lynch, but I don’t expect too many of those days from Beanie. I didn’t realize Lynch ran a 4.36 — scary for a back of that type. Both backs have questionable shelf-lives due to their aggressive styles.
You basically said my exact thoughts
But while many are quick to point out that Beanie is younger so he has a longer shelf life, I’d disagree. The theory is RBs don’t last into their 30s because of injury. The physical toll they take every game is far to hard on the body which leads to knee, back, neck, and just about everyother injury possible.
But considering Beanie is already plagued with a pretty serious, reoccuring injury, is his shelf life really longer? Is his body at the same point health wise as let’s say a relatively injury free running back at age 27 or 28? It’s safe to assume that his knee will plague him the rest of his career. While I agree with tw3kr that a 100% healthy Beanie is a lot scarier then Lynch, I dunno if we will ever see much more of a 100% healthy Beanie. Which is sad.
That being said, I love Beanie like a brother that I’ve never met but watch on tv every Sunday, but I’d take Lynch. And if you wanna get real crazy… I’d rather have SJax over both!
by cgcardzfan on Dec 31, 2011 3:10 AM MST via mobile up reply actions
I didn't think Lynch had 4.35 speed
I like them both, but Beanie is younger and they both seem to play with a similar punishing style right now so I’ll stick with him.
Arizona Cardinals/Chicago Bears fan
Phoenix Suns, Arizona Diamondbacks, Phoenix Coyotes, Arizona Rattlers fan
[I have always lived in Arizona, dad is from Chicago].
Leading the NFL in swagtangibles
Wanted Lynch when he was on the outs with the Bills.
Now I’d be happy with either, as long ad Beanie can get healthy.
When life gives you lemons... Bag them up and sell them. Fruit can be expensive these days.
by hevchv on Dec 31, 2011 2:42 AM MST via Android app reply actions

























