2011 NFL Mock Draft: Kiper And McShay Say Blaine Gabbert Will Be A Cardinal
Both of ESPN's draft experts have released their latest mock drafts. Both Mel Kiper and Todd McShay seem to have copied off of one another, at least for the first five picks of the first round, as they are identical. Both have Cam Newton coming off the board at number one, followed by Marcell Dareus, Von Miller and A.J. Green. That leaves the Arizona Cardinals with a tough choice: select who is considered by many as the best player in the draft (LSU CB Patrick Peterson) or go with the best quarterback available (Missouri's Blaine Gabbert).
According to both experts, Gabbert is the guy and Peterson falls an additional two picks to the San Francisco 49ers.
Kiper says this about the pick of Gabbert:
I could also see Arizona getting creative and looking for a veteran arm such as Kolb, but Gabbert is the quarterback in the draft most likely to help a team soonest, and if he's available here, it might be tough for Arizona to pass on him. He offers elite size, accuracy, athleticism and the smarts to pick things up quickly at the NFL level. This is a pick I could see going in several directions, but if Arizona isn't confident they can get a suitable veteran fix in at quarterback, Gabbert is a good choice.
McShay justifies his projection this way:
With Miller off the board, Gabbert is a no-brainer here. The Cardinals might have a trying season in 2011 with a rookie quarterback at the helm but the team cannot believe that Max Hall or John Skelton is the long-term answer at the position. Gabbert might not be the first quarterback off the board but I believe his combination of intangibles, mental makeup and accuracy will make him the best quarterback from the 2011 class when all is said and done.
With the quarterback need taken care of in the first round, the Cardinals turn their attention to the pass rush in the second round. Kiper projects that the Cardinals will take Arizona's Brooks Reed and McShay has them selecting UCLA's Akeem Ayers in the second round.
You really can't fault the Cards for going this way for both of their first draft picks. Miller is gone and many think Gabbert is the best QB in the draft, while both Reed and Ayers are projected to be productive players on the outside.
Were it my choice, I would take Peterson and then a pass rusher. The Cardinals are going to have to get a veteran QB anyway and Ken Whisenhunt still believes that John Skelton is going to be a good quarterback. The last time the Cardinals took the consensus best player available at their pick was when they drafted Larry Fitzgerald. i don't think they have ever regretted that pick. As noted on Tuesday, there is damning evidence against drafting a QB in the second round, so even with taking Peterson I still go for the best pass rusher I can find in that round.
However, if the Cards do believe that Gabbert will be a franchise guy, you have to make that pick. It may not be where he is a "gift from heaven" as Leinart was (at least on draft day), but if Gabbert is available we really could not fault the team for taking him.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If this scenario happens I say trade down
And get a good pass rusher in the first, plus an extra pick
Follow me on Twitter @RedBirdRevival
+1
Maybe I missed something on Gabbert from watching him in the Big 12 the last two years but I just don’t see him as 5th pick worthy.
Founder of the Coalition to Light Vince Carter On Fire (CTLVCOF)
RIP Seasons of Discontent
by Scott Howard on Apr 6, 2011 12:21 PM MDT up reply actions
No need to trade down...
Just take Peterson.
Like the Cardinals? Revenge of the Birds is where to go.
Like Arizona Sports in general? SB Nation Arizona is where you'll get it all.
While I agree with taking Peterson I can understand why not to take him!
He’s not the sharpest tool in the shed, indicators he could be an off field issue maker, and to me feels "Rolle"esque…nothing wrong with Rolle if he had stayed but I think if they don’t go with him that is why…
by Punisher3190 on Apr 6, 2011 12:46 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
Sharpest tool
Doesn’t matter at CB. This isn’t QB we’re talkin about! CB is more about athletic ability than anything else. Peterson would be a good pick and I’ve heard nothing in regards to him having any issues off the field or character wise! Peterson is in a whole other galaxy compared to Rolle athletically! Passing on Gabbert would be really hard to do and if you do you know SF would grab him and your going to face him 2x’s a year!
That said, IMO, the best move the Cards can make is to take Peterson at #5 then use your 2nd and 3rd to move back into the bottom of the 1st and take Ponder! Ponder, IMO, is the #2 QB in this draft behind Gabbert! This way you clear up 2 of your biggest holes! Stll have one at OLB, but Schofield should be MUCH better this year!
You've been Stroh'd™!!!
He can't throw down field!
Why take a QB that can not hit down field passes? It is just stupid! If Peterson is there grab him. If nothing else we can use him in a trade to get a QB worth something. Gabbert will be no better than Skelton, so there is no need to have another QB that has never played in the NFL! We have other needs as well people!
Around 30% completion rate on passes over 15 yards
Thats not even downfield. I agree with Peterson or trading down
by Redbird Nation #1 on Apr 6, 2011 4:30 PM MDT up reply actions
I want Miller damn it.
Lifelong Arizona Cardinals/Phoenix Suns/Chicago Bears fan [I have always lived in Arizona, dad is from Chicago].
McShay must really hate the Cards
to have us taking both Gabbert and Akeem Ayers. Might as well trade both picks for GB’s 6th and 7th, the results would be the same.
Funny you say that
If you look back at all the ESPN writer’s picks for who would win various match-ups, McShay is the only one that consistently took the Cards. That is, until he finally realized how bad we truly were.
Follow me on Twitter @RedBirdRevival
I have
that feeling that the Bills are going after Miller. They missed on that OLB spot the last couple of years just like the Cardinals. Miller is that consensus guy for the spot and both teams need it fixed. They at least have a little faith in Fitzpatrick at QB and Buddy Nix never spends a top pick on one. Peterson would be awesome but I also have to think with the new DC and a zone blitz defense that CB gets a back seat until a later round. If no trade/free agency can happen in the next few weeks before the draft to get a veteran QB in place Gabbert may be the guy. I hope not as Gabbert is good but probably not worth a pick at #5.
They are wrong...
About as wrong as I have ever seen someone be wrong…






















