How To Get The Best Out Of Kevin Kolb – A Statistical Look
With the Cardinals having made the deal to get “their” guy and bring Kevin Kolb to the Cardinals at the price of Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie and a 2nd round draft choice in the 2012 draft and handing his a 5 year $63M extension with $21M of that in guarantees, it is clear that as Kevin Kolb goes over the next few seasons so will the Arizona Cardinals.
The question now becomes how to the Cardinals ensure that they put their new quarterback in the positions to allow him to best succeed?
If the Cardinals want to get the best they can out of Kevin Kolb it is going to mean a change from their offensive philosophy of the past few seasons, and not just a subtle change, but a complete overhaul. The Cardinals since 2007 have been a very pass heavy team, and most of those throws have been from the shotgun. The Cardinals have loved throwing four and five wide receiver sets out onto the field, spreading it out and looking to find space and they have shown a resistance to consistently running the football.
The first major change the Cardinals will need to make is in their formations. In 2010 nearly 65% of the Cardinals passing plays were from the Shotgun. Kevin Kolb from the Shotgun in the 2010 season posted a 65.2 Quarterback Rating and threw 3 TD’s to 5 INT’s, compounded by YPA of just 5.23. Compare that to Kolb in 2010 when he took snaps under center, a Quarterback Rating of 94.64, 4 TD’s to 2 INT’s, and a YPA of 8.22. If Arizona wants to see the best of Kevin Kolb they are going to need to move from a shotgun based passing attack to one that operates more and more from under center.
The second major change the Cardinals will need to make is also a part of their formations, this time it will be the number of receivers they put onto the football field. In 2010 the Cardinals lined up with 4 or 5 receivers on the field for a larger percentage of their offensive snaps than any other team in the NFL. They had at least three on the field for 60% of their offensive snaps. This will need to be completely reversed if the Cardinals want to see the best of Kevin Kolb. When Kolb was on the field with 2 receivers he posted a Quarterback Rating of 101, he completed 65% of his passes for a YPA of 8.73 and had 4 TD’s to 2 INT’s, when he was out there with three or more wide receivers Kolb posted a Quarterback Rating of 63.75, completed just 59% of his passes for a YPA of 5.13 and 3 TD’s to 5 INT’s. To get the best out of Kolb you are going to need to line up with just two receivers a majority of the time and hope to get some good production from your tight ends and backs, both areas Kolb loves to throw the football.
The third major change the Cardinals will need to make is committing to the running game, and committing the running the football at least 25 times a game. In 5 starts over the past two seasons (Excluding the Dallas game vs backups and the Packers game when he attempted just 10 passes before leaving injured.) when the Eagles had 25 or more rushing attempts Kolb has posted a Quarterback rating of 119.37, he has completed 72.34 percent of his passes at 9.63 YPA and thrown 6 TD’s to 1 INT. In games the Eagles have run the football less than 25 times in a game Kolb has a Quarterback Rating of 65.30 completed 57.58 percent of his passes at 6.28 YPA and thrown 3 TD’s to 5 INT’s. To put Kolb in the best position to succeed the Cardinals need to finally commit to running the football, and running the football on a consistent basis upwards of 400 times a season.
An overview, you want to get the best out of Kolb, you line up with Kolb under center, two WR’s, two TE’s and a lone setback or something similar the uses two receivers a no more than three and always keeps a tight end on the field. You commit to running the football, really running the football; regardless of the success you are having keep pounding the ball on the ground.
Is it possible for the Cardinals to make such a sweeping change in their offensive philosophy over the course of this short offseason? It is certainly in their best interests to try, and judging by some of the moves this offseason it certainly seems as if they have been geared to a switch up in how the Cardinals play the game on offense.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Revenge of the Birds' (ROTB) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of ROTB's editors.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Very nice article. I do think with Miller manning the OC duties and the moves by the FO will be seeing more of the offense you refer to.
"The point is, by my standards, I won fair and square."
-Bender
Yes because if like the Whiz and Graves said by doing the due diligence then they -- including Miller should know what Kolb is best at in when operating an offense. Oh and just because he was the passing coordinator doesn't mean as an OC ...
… he will be more inclined to pass. It’s his job to come up with a plan that works week in and week out. Again if you look at the moves made in the draft and off season thus far it does lend itself to that type of O.
"The point is, by my standards, I won fair and square."
-Bender
Same thing was said last preseason
I’ll believe they are a run first team when they do it on game day.
I'm not saying they are going to a run team. I'm just saying given the actions of the FO it seems like a strong possiblity. I said last I didn't think the O would change much if any.
This year I think it will be more balanced. Something like 55-45 (pass to run).
"The point is, by my standards, I won fair and square."
-Bender
It's been the general expectation since Whis came here that they would build a run first offense.
They did exactly the opposite. Granted when you have a talent like Warner you play to his strengths. Last year’s aberration leaves me questioning if that assumption had any merit at all. I hope they do become more balanced, yet remain dynamic. The ultimate offense can beat you in any manner. That’s what I would like to see them steer towards.
Nice job putting this together.
Still think the sample is too small for it to be very relevant though. Hope the rumors of talks with Todd Heap turn out to be true and he does sign here. That would be a big help for Kolb and the development of Housler too.
I think they can do that. I mean look at the changes to the OL. and the addition of Jeff King. and the addition of williams
I still think the line is a thing still morphing
At least I hope so. I have little faith in Brown as LT. LG is Colledge the new guy from Green Bay, and I have no inkling of how he will perform. In his defense, he played for last year’s champs. C. The Cards did well here, re-signing Sendlein. RG will be Hadnot. Ok. I have mixed feelings. He didn’t start over Deuce last year. Does that make him bad. No. This is his year to step up and perform. RT Keith. People say he has talent. I’d like to see it this year. Last year he looked beat. By the speed rusher, by the bull rush.
Overall, I’d replace Brown. Pick up someone. Please. Keeping Kolb upright is how to get the best out of him.
Just a guy, because I was born that way.
We are reportedly interested in Todd Heap
we would look pretty good out there with 2TE sets if we get him.
Heap is actually interested in returning
to the Valley of the Sun, sooner we get him the better.
by Cardsfan928 on Jul 30, 2011 11:09 AM MDT up reply actions
I would love to see more running.
I think Brown is a good run blocker.the new guy from GB is smallish (for an OLineman) but maybe that means he can be good at pulling.
No more night. I have seen the light. Let it shine on bright.
HANG HIM HIGHER!!!
by Cuckoo for Coco Puffs on Jul 30, 2011 8:10 AM MDT via mobile reply actions
CB Marshall Signed
According to Urban is on his way to AZ.
"The true test of a person's intellligence is how much they agree with you."
Interesting correlations
The question I had as I read the article was, Are looking at the stats this way putting the cart before the horse possibly? Did they have 25 running plays, fewer wr in those games, and more snaps under center because Kolb is on fire; or is Kolb on fire because of the running game, personnel and formations chosen. In any event the correlation, is of note.
by Drullin'OverDaCards on Jul 30, 2011 9:27 AM MDT reply actions
Adjusted Net Yards per Attempt
Over at Field Gulls there is a post trying to prove that Kolb sucks using this stat. Never mind that they are comparing seven games to entire seasons or careers. If it was a comparison of each quarterbacks first seven starts it might have some small value. As I’ve said before, the sample is too small to use stats as a projection. I kind of like that so many people want to bash on Kolb. He fits well with the dynamic of the team. Let the hate pile on. I want my team playing with a massive chip on it’s collective shoulder.
They would not be doing this if they got him though
Lifelong Arizona Cardinals/Phoenix Suns/Chicago Bears fan [I have always lived in Arizona, dad is from Chicago].
I disagree with your first point.
The Eagles have been historically bad out of the shotgun whether it was McNabb, Vick or Kolb at QB. In college at Houston Kolb worked primarily out of the shotgun for all four years and was very successful in that system. So don’t just write off the shotgun.
I'm not drunk I'm just drinking.
Hit post a little early there
On the second point I agree. When the Eagles had a more “max protect” formation Kolb is able to pick his targets and get the ball there accurately. Kolbs biggest issue is that he tends to get happy feet after a hit or two and his accuracy goes way down when he’s on the move.
I'm not drunk I'm just drinking.
by no1pipelayer on Jul 30, 2011 4:42 PM MDT up reply actions























