Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage of 2012 Coke 600

Five Positives From The Arizona Cardinals/Denver Broncos Preseason Game

Photo

The Arizona Cardinals finished off the preseason last night with a with a 26 -7 victory over the Denver Broncos. The team played well collectively, giving the Cardinals some positive momentum going into their regular season opener against the Carolina Panthers. There were many positives in this game and many young players played well, making it difficult I'm sure for coaches to cut to a 53 man roster this week. 

The Cardinals have plenty of things to work on in the up coming week, however, here are five positives that I saw in last nights game against the Broncos.

Star-divide

Rich Bartel's play has all but solidified his position as the #2 QB

Rich Bartel took over the reigns last night after one series by Kevin Kolb and payed very well. Due to the high ankle sprain of second year veteran John Skelton, Bartel has moved up on the depth chart as the #2 QB for the Cardinals. Bartel was 12-16 passing with 216 yards. He did throw one interception and still had a quarterback rating of 130.2. Bartel showed poise in the pocket and the ability to make the second and third reads, finding Chansi Stucky on one of those reads for a 48 yard touchdown pass. I wish Skelton a speedy recovery to earn back his #2 spot, however, Bartel is going to make it very difficult if he keeps playing as well as he did last night. 

"Are they who we think they are?"

The Cardinals' second team defense played the majority of the first half and they played very well. In the first half alone they forced Denver to punt the ball 5 teams, forced 1 fumble, had an interception, and 1 sack. In my opinion there wasn't one player that particularly stood out, it was just a great showing of hustle and good team defense. Stewart Bradley did have a nice interception that he returned to the redzone, however, the offense only capitalized with a field goal by Jay Feely. The Cardinals are also showing signs of getting pressure on the QB, which caused Brady Quinn to make several bad passes that caused Denver plenty of "3 and outs" in the first half. 

The offense nearly doubled Denver's time of possession 

The Cardinals' time of possession was nearly double that of their opponents last night. The Cardinals had the ball for 39:23 to the Bronco's  20:37. This stat wasn't common to the Cardinals this past year and not since Kurt Warner led our team, but this could be a sign of things to come. I know the starters of both teams didn't play much last night, however, this is still a positive sign which contributed to a good victory.

Jay Feely the MVP? 

I ask this only to be a little humorous. Is it though? Jay Feely had 4 field goals last night, one of those for 52 yards! I know the Cardinals shouldn't be depending on the field goal kicker as much as they have in the past, but this is one positive I couldn't pass up. To have a "money" field goal kicker on your team is very important, especially in close games where three points could cost or win you the game. What I also like about Feely is that he isn't afraid to make a tackle on kickoff returns when he needs to. Maybe it's the gloves he wears that give him supernatural powers? Whatever it is, I hope he keeps kicking well, he may be depended on quite a bit this year. 

Tim Tebow containment

I didn't include this in the defense for a couple of reasons. Tebow's instinct will always be to run the ball if he can't find an open receiver. The Cardinals held Tebow to only 8 yards rushing last night, but did allow him to throw for over 100 yards.  I thought this was important because they will be playing the Panther's next week and Cam Newton will be the starting quarterback. Newton and Tebow have similar running traits, so hopefully this is a good sign of what to expect next week from the defense. The Cardinals' should make Newton beat them through the air and not the ground, where he is absolutely dangerous when given the chance. 

I'm glad the preseason is finally over and the regular season is now just nine days away. I hope the Cardinals will be ready by then and will unleash against Cam Newton and the Panthers next week. The last thing I want to see are highlights of Cam Newton beating us at home in his first NFL game.

I predict we will see the opposite, and a 34 to 17 victory for the Cardinals. 

Comment 24 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I hope that is the score

Seems possible, not sure how well Newt will play but also dont know how well Kolb will play, cant wait to listen to it on radio, and the occassional Redzone! Damn Boston network…

"Victory belongs to the most Preserving" - Napoleon

by RotB_MattR on Sep 2, 2011 12:23 PM MDT reply actions  

a Boston Cards fan?

well I’ll be damned, thats refreshing.

by Gildo on Sep 2, 2011 12:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

Week 1 prediction

Cam Newton will leave the game early due to cramps and DA will come in and throw 7 TDs

by ksredbird on Sep 2, 2011 1:23 PM MDT reply actions  

Do you mean 7 int’s?? Lol

Co-host of the Arizona Birdgang Podcast. Listen to our podcast right here at ROTB, iTunes, and Stitcher Radio. GO CARDINALS!!

by Mario Ortiz on Sep 2, 2011 1:33 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions  

Sounds more like it

Arizona Cardinals/Chicago Bears fan
Phoenix Suns, Arizona Diamondbacks, Phoenix Coyotes, Arizona Rattlers fan
[I have always lived in Arizona, dad is from Chicago].

Leading the NFL in swagtangibles

by JoeCB1991 on Sep 2, 2011 3:22 PM MDT up reply actions  

#6

The Cardinals survived the final pre-season game without sustaining a season-ending injury to a key component of the team.

Perhaps I am overstating or incorrectly analyzing this, but it seems to me that the Cardinals have an alarming lack of depth across the board. The drop off from starter to reserve at most positions is declivitous. Hopefully injuries don’t decimate the season.

It was only called the mildly irritated house on McDowell until I showed up.

by Jim Coughenour on Sep 2, 2011 1:40 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

+1 and recd

Like the Cardinals? Revenge of the Birds is where to go.
Like Arizona Sports in general? SB Nation Arizona is where you'll get it all.
Follow me on Twitter! @senorjessroot

by Jess Root on Sep 2, 2011 2:13 PM MDT up reply actions  

+1

Although I like most of our depth, nice use of a word I’ve never heard of. Declivitous.

If you don't have anything good to say about the Cards this season, you'd be correct.

by hevchv on Sep 2, 2011 2:45 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions  

I disagree...

Granted, we are thin at many positions, but so is every other team. Other than Wells, Fitz &Kolb I dont think we would be devestated if any other positions were lost.
Consider, we lost Wells backup already. A stater at cb (toler) and traded DRC to improve at QB.

No more night. I have seen the light. Let it shine on bright.
HANG HIM HIGHER!!!

by Cuckoo for Coco Puffs on Sep 2, 2011 2:55 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions  

Not so sure we would be devastated by a loss of Kevin Kolb.

Not if Bartel keeps playing at the level he has this preseason.

by hadrarius on Sep 2, 2011 2:57 PM MDT up reply actions  

Stop that right now...please

Bartel was a UFL BACKUP. He has looked very good against reserves. Bartel in place of Kolb means 2010. A game or two…maybe ok.

Like the Cardinals? Revenge of the Birds is where to go.
Like Arizona Sports in general? SB Nation Arizona is where you'll get it all.
Follow me on Twitter! @senorjessroot

by Jess Root on Sep 2, 2011 3:00 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

I agree with that.

Last night a bunch of us were all giddy over Bartell until it was pointed out we had MHS (Max Hall Syndrom).
My point was..who woyldn’t be devasted with injuries to their top guys? Could GB repeat without Rodgers? Could any team withstand the loss of multiple starters? (last year GB lost their TE & RB, but not their backups too).

No more night. I have seen the light. Let it shine on bright.
HANG HIM HIGHER!!!

by Cuckoo for Coco Puffs on Sep 2, 2011 3:18 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions  

Hey, the guy has looked good all preseason.

Not just in game four, aka the Scrub Bowl. If he can play that well against starters then we would not be “devastated” by the loss of Kolb. I have never said that Bartel is going to be elite or anything. Just that he has played well and deserves to be Kolb’s back up. It’s not just his stats either (which are impressive). He looks good on video. He is calm and collected in the pocket. Progresses through his reads in good time. Throws some spot on passes.

On the down side he throws some floaters too. He hasn’t been up against the best opposition and no one has game planned against him. The floaters come when he throws off his back foot. That is something he can overcome with proper direction.

Seems to me there has been some over reaction to positive comments about Bartel that is more of a backlash to the affectation so many fans had with Max Hall last year. Last season anyone other than Derek Anderson brought some hope of relief, from Derek Anderson. Neither of our back ups were ready to be more than back ups but watching a rookie fail was more appealing than watching DA. Then again there were a few fans that conned themselves into buying into Anderception too. Fans outside the metro Phoenix area were not as into Hall as those from the valley.

Fear not Jess, I suffer no delusions of Bartel’s grandeur. I think he has worked hard to become a competent quarterback in the nfl, however circuitous his route. I am confident that if Kolb has to leave a game that he can get the job done. I am not so enamored that I think he is the next Tom Brady.

by hadrarius on Sep 2, 2011 3:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

Ok, good

I agree Bartel has been solid. But if he starts for more than a game or two, our season is poop.

Like the Cardinals? Revenge of the Birds is where to go.
Like Arizona Sports in general? SB Nation Arizona is where you'll get it all.
Follow me on Twitter! @senorjessroot

by Jess Root on Sep 2, 2011 4:07 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

On the 5 positives

1. Bartel has been very impressive. He has certainly outplayed Skelton and deserves the #2 spot on his own merit. Skelton will still get the time to develop that he needs as the third stringer. The kid’s got potential but is still too raw.

2. The defense was inspiring last night. But it was game four of the preseason, so not as inspiring as it would otherwise have been.

3. Time of possession. That is awesome. What was the TOP for the first half alone? The Cardinals defense destroyed the Broncos in the first half. We did not see clock domination like this during Warner’s time. The offense put up points quickly with Warner but rarely sustained long drives.

4. I like Jay Feely too. The guy is good in the clutch. Rackers wasn’t. Glad they made the change. Last year I wished that he had more leg on his kick offs. Won’t matter now.

5. Tebow / Newton. Most of Tebow’s yards came on a pass to Riley didn’t they? I was too tired to pay much attention as the second half went on. Watching the highlights I thought that guy looked pretty darn impressive once he caught the ball. Tebow scares me not at all. Brady Quinn was beyond dreadful last night. Tebow couldn’t be worse than that. Elway must really have it out for him. Haven’t watched Newton play yet. Was planning on reviewing the Panthers games prior to next sunday. Cam is in for a nasty day if our defense continues to improve as it has over four weeks.

by hadrarius on Sep 2, 2011 3:37 PM MDT reply actions  

In regards to #4, kicker evaluation is a fickle matter.

http://articles.nydailynews.com/2009-12-21/sports/17942086_1_snap-kellen-clemens-jets

http://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=251127026

http://www.aolnews.com/2010/01/24/missed-field-goals-haunt-jets-after-previously-helping-them/

Feely has had just as many struggles as the next guy. An infallible kicker doesn’t usually bump around through 6 teams in 10 years. Kicking is a tough gig. I like Feely, but leg strength is a concern and he is not impervious to failure.

I agree with the lion’s share of the rest of what you said.

I’m not really sure what the deal is with Tebow? It seems like there’s an agenda or vendetta against him. He played in a couple of games last year and did fine. He has done fine this preseason. I suspect that a player like Tebow (Rothlisberger, Vick, Newton, Young, etc.) isn’t going to translate to perfection in practice. I think that some players can just have a bigger impact in real game situations.

I don’t think that Tebow is ever going to set the world on fire, but from everything I’ve seen I still don’t understand why everybody wants to bury him when other guys (Russell, Smith, Young, DA, etc.) have been given opportunity after opportunity. Why did the Broncos even draft him if they didn’t want to play him? Were they actually oblivious to the media circus and scrutiny that was going to follow their selection?

My guess is that he’ll probably get another chance before the end of the year when the team is 4-8 or something to that effect. Even if the Broncos do think that Orton is the best option to lead the team (to a 6-10 record), why don’t they put some plays in running Tebow as a fullback and mix up some direct snaps and trickery? I guess I’m just a stupid fan and the pundits are always right. That’s why every QB taken in the top 10 succeeds and everyone else is doomed to failure.

It was only called the mildly irritated house on McDowell until I showed up.

by Jim Coughenour on Sep 2, 2011 4:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

Expectations of a first round pick.

If he’d been taken in the fourth the story lines would be different. Denver overvalued him.
Second I think you underestimate Denver. They are not playoff material but they could have a pretty solid offense this year.

by Jesse Reynolds on Sep 2, 2011 4:28 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions  

Tebow was McDaniels vanity pick.

He traded up to take him in the first round. McDaniels got himself fired. Elway wants a more traditional quarterback. Look for Denver to draft a new model in the next year or two. Tebow just got stuck in a bad situation. He won’t remain with Denver for too long.

by hadrarius on Sep 2, 2011 4:41 PM MDT up reply actions  

Feely vs Rackers

The stats for both of these kickers were poured over thoroughly at the time Feely was signed with the Cardinals. What stood out as the difference was Feely’s field goal percentage in crucial circumstances compared to Rackers’. Mike Sando of ESPN went over these stats in detail. I remember reading several other analyses back then as well. No kicker is perfect, but Feely is more reliable than Rackers by a long shot when you get down to do or die time.

by hadrarius on Sep 2, 2011 4:47 PM MDT up reply actions  

Do you know where I can look at those statistics?

I was having a hard time finding anything that rates a kickers career situational field goal accuracy.

I did searches to try to find the articles you referenced, but couldn’t find them.

I found the old story on ROTB, but there weren’t any links or statistical evidence to back anything up.

I did a quick search on NFL.com and it shows that Rackers has only missed one field goal in the second half of a game the last two years (he made a game winner in overtime). Feely has missed 5 field goals in the second half the last two years (no overtime kicks).

I’m not pining to bring Rackers back. I thought at the time of the move that the decision was based on money not talent. I can see why somebody could assert that Feely is a wash, but I really don’t think that he’s obviously better than Rackers. Feely is fine. I was just pointing out that he has been involved in some historically significant choke jobs over the years. It was a lot easier for me to find articles detailing Feely’s struggles than anything to support that he is a superior kicker to Rackers.

It was only called the mildly irritated house on McDowell until I showed up.

by Jim Coughenour on Sep 2, 2011 5:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

If there is an archive of nfc west blog articles at ESPN

you might find Sando’s work on it. I don’t remember where I read the rest. As I recall the stats compared were for their full careers. Over the last two years Rackers may well have the edge. Last year’s stats didn’t exist yet of course. Sando broke down field goal attempts by game situation with particular attention to late kicks with the game on the line. He did a good job of selling me on Feely. No shocker that it’s easy to find articles on Feely’s time with the Jets. Biggest media market out there. Another thing that I liked about Feely was that his overall field goal percentage was nearly as good as Rackers but he played in lousy conditions, while Rackers was kicking indoors. Meadowlands was an awful place to kick because of the swirling winds. Buffalo and Foxboro every year can be a handful too.

by hadrarius on Sep 2, 2011 6:17 PM MDT up reply actions  

Found some Sando articles.

The first two make the side by side comparison. Rackers from ‘03 to ’09 made 4 field goals in critical situations but missed 6. Feely from ’01 to ’09 made 15 and missed 7. Sando didn’t include Rackers’ first three seasons with Cincinnati.

Feely’s Career FG % – 82.3 / PAT % 99.4
Rackers’ Career FG % – 79.5 / PAT % 98.5

Not much difference over the careers really. Both did not start off well. Rackers has been excellent the last three years (89.3, 94.1, 90.0%). His best year was ’05 (95.2). The rest of his seasons were significantly below.

 Feely averaged 84.4% playing at the Meadowlands (’05 & ’06 with Giants, "08, ’09 with Jets). With Miami in ’07 his average was 91.3. With the Cardinals last year 88.9. I figure the weather conditions in NY were a large factor in the discrepancy.

Statistically about a wash. Feely has been better in the clutch based on Sando’s analysis. That’s his only edge.

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/16407/feely-gets-another-shot-at-qwest

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/16394/rackers-retrospective-kicking-in-clutch

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/16399/feely-over-rackers-whisenhunt-explains

http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/id/16380/rackers-could-be-done-in-arizona

by hadrarius on Sep 2, 2011 6:58 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

You can also look

at the “eye test”. Over the years, Rackers hit A LOT of FG, but he was notoriously shady with the game on the line. His mental makeup was the most troubling thing. He would look like he would not want anything to do with the kicks. The kick against Green Bay in the playoffs was the one that ruined it for him here.

Like the Cardinals? Revenge of the Birds is where to go.
Like Arizona Sports in general? SB Nation Arizona is where you'll get it all.
Follow me on Twitter! @senorjessroot

by Jess Root on Sep 2, 2011 10:16 PM MDT up reply actions  

I agree, we could have won that game in regulation and could’ve saved a lot of drama.

Co-host of the Arizona Birdgang Podcast. Listen to our podcast right here at ROTB, iTunes, and Stitcher Radio

Follow me on twitter @NewMario2010https://twitter.com/#!/NewMario2010

by Mario Ortiz on Sep 3, 2011 12:32 PM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Arizona Cardinals blog for SB Nation network. Covering the Arizona Cardinals 24/7. Be a Redbird watcher with us, but please follow our community guidelines

Contact ROTB

Here at RotB we're always looking for new contributors or anyone just willing to give their feedback. If you'd like to become a contributor, create your own weekly segments, or just have a question or concern, contact me at rotb.sbnaz@gmail.com.

Arizona Birdgang Podcast -- Click below to listen to any episode you want!


Head Coach

Jess_root_small Jess Root

My_boy_larry_small Tyler Nickel

Coordinators

8217_1234799911513_1274651091_711766_4686824_n_small CardsFan08

Revan_small JoeCB1991

Assistant Coaches

577d914870be748ea886865adfe932ca_small Jesse Reynolds

Arizona_phoenix_bird_small Skii

Kiwiavatar_small khodder

Small cdeveau

Izzy_reasonably_small_small GreaZzy

Rotb_small Mario Ortiz

Ukulele_small Joe Zuppa

Index_small Alex Mann