Arizona Cardinals Roster Moves May Have Been Influenced By Suspension
When the decision was made to cut fullback Reagan Maui'a to get the team down to the 53-man roster last Friday, most believed it was a simple numbers game. It may have been just that, considering it was unlikely that the Arizona Cardinals were going to keep more than one fullback on the roster. They already had Anthony Sherman whom they drafted in the fifth round of this year's NFL Draft.
Both Sherman and Maui'a had great camps. There were even a few of us in the community who believed that the Cardinals should have kept two fullbacks three running backs on the roster. But in the end, Sherman got the job and Maui'a was let go and it may have been affected by something other than numbers.
It was reported that Maui'a will be suspended for the first three games of the 2011 season if/when he is signed to another team.
Back a few years ago, he was arrested on a battery charge in 2008. This disciplinary action is not for that. According to a tweet from Kent Somers, this suspension that Maui'a will have to serve is related to the league's substance abuse policy.
You have to wonder if the Cards may have known this.
Now Sherman did beat out Maui'a in camp overall and most did not believe that the team would keep two fullbacks on the roster. However, considering the running back situation, they may have decided to hold on to him and Sherman while they looked for another running back.
Obviously the team would not have wanted to carry a player that was going to miss the first month of the season, so this might very well have played into the decision.
In the end, this is one of those posts that do not uplift. It is unfortunate that Maui'a was involved in PEDs. In any case, we wish him well as a community and hope that he lands somewhere soon.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Does the suspension follow him forever or can a team sign him later?
Assuming this is all true, the suspension I mean, what happens if he does not play this year anywhere? Would the suspension follow him to next season? That could end up being a death sentence for a player just trying to eek into the top 53. What team is gonna want to take a guy only to have him out for 3 weeks?
by Drullin'OverDaCards on Sep 6, 2011 3:23 PM MDT reply actions
He is out for the first 3 weeks
Regardless if he is signed or still a free agent. He just cannot play in the first 3 games of the 2011 season
I thought it was HIS first 3 games of this season. Meaning, for example, if he was signed Week 14, he wouldn’t be eligible until the playoffs.
If you don't have anything good to say about the Cards this season, you'd be correct.
by hevchv on Sep 6, 2011 4:33 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
I thought so, too
but the more I’ve read it looks like it’s just the first three games of the season.
Like the Cardinals? Revenge of the Birds is where to go.
Like Arizona Sports in general? SB Nation Arizona is where you'll get it all.
Follow me on Twitter! @senorjessroot
I always thought they'd keep two FB.
Chester Taylor seems to be just taking up space as he’s really not going to utilized much if at all. I’d rather keep Maui’a.
its unfair that you say peds in the article.
you don’t know for sure if it was Performance enhancing drugs, recreational drugs, or even an alcohol related offense. Substance abuse policy covers a lot of ground. Obviously it wont matter to the team if he was on the roster or not as a second string fullback that would have been suspended. why not throw him out and if there are injuries in the first three weeks bring him back. no one is probably going to pick him up and unless there is an injury he wouldn’t be in the game.anyway so it was a good move on the cardinals part. they have let him go and brought him back before it would not surprise me to see him again.























