Arizona Cardinals 2011 Season Grades: The Full Report Card
Over the past couple of weeks, we have looked back at each position group of the Arizona Cardinals and have given them grades. We also polled the community to see if there was any difference. I think we can all agree that with an 8-8 record on the season, that we are going to see some mediocre grades on the whole, despite the second half run the team put on.
Since the posts were spread out, let's go ahead and look at them all again and compare the grades you all as the community and how Tyler and I doled out grades ourselves.
QB:
Writer grade: C, reader grade: C (56 percent)
We all seemed to agree that mediocre was the theme.
RB:
Writer grade: B, reader grade: B (62 percent)
It was a good year. We were all on the same page, it seems.
WR:
Writer grade: C, reader grade: crazy (27 percent F, 25 percent D, 25 percent B)
You were all over the map. I don't see how it is even logical to give a group that includes Larry Fitzgerald an F -- or really even a D. Early Doucet had a career year, albeit not superb. Andre Roberts made big contributions in the second half of the season.
OL:
Writer grade: D-, reader grade: 41 percent D, 39 percent F
This is completely reasonable. Your poll did not have plus or minus grades, so it could not have been teh same, but the split says you agreed more or less.
TE:
Writer grade: C-, reader grade: C (49 percent)
Injuries played a huge part in the lowering of the overall grade. The potential for an 'A' group is definitely there.
DL:
Writer grade: A-, reader grade: B (53 percent)
Again, we are splitting hairs. The obvious strength of the team
LB:
Writer grade: C+, reader grade: B (60 percent)
The reader grade is undoubtedly swayed by the play late in the year when the defense was effective and Joey Porter was no longer in the lineup.
DB:
Writer grade: D+. reader grade: 34 percent D, 33 percent C
Again with a writer plus/minus grade, the readers split the two letter grades around it. We think mostly alike.
ST:
Writer grade: B+, reader grade: A (53 percent)
Patrick Peterson's returns and Calais Campbell's field goal blocking give big extra credit to an average kicking and punting game, and to a forgettable season in kickoff returns.
...
There you have it. We are not too different in our thinking. Is there anything left to say about what went well/not so well with each position's play as a group?
Definitely keep discussing it, as we will close this series.
Keep up with Cardinals news and opinions when you are not on the site. Follow Revenge of the Birds on Twitter at @revengeofbirds and "like" us on Facebook. You can follow me individually at @senorjessroot.
10 comments
|
Add comment
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Solving the QB situation is the most important issue
Nothing much matters to me until the QB situation is settled. Hate to say it but Kolb is not the answer nor is anyone currently on the roster. We need improvements at LB OL and the secondary but it doesn’ make a bit of difference unless we get a true QB. 90% of the time the teams with elite QB’s win Super Bowls, not teams with average or “good” QB’s. Thats a fact.
I think while there are concerns
it is unfair to say that Kolb isn’t the answer. Kurt Warner looked like an old, turnover prone QB when he first came over. With Kolb and his time lost to the lockout and injuries, we just can’t say that he isn’t. You can certainly raise the question whether he will be durable, but that’s about it so far.
Like the Cardinals? Revenge of the Birds is where to go.
Like Arizona Sports in general? SB Nation Arizona is where you'll get it all.
Follow me on Twitter! @senorjessroot
Whoa,
Are you seriously comparing Kolb to Warner? One notable difference is Warner was the signal caller of one of the most prolific offenses in NFL history and had MVP honors. Kolb hasn’t done anything except prove he can’t handle the rigors of an entire season.
Formerly known as Cardsfan928, If you wanna grab a quick game of madden, my screenname is also my Xbox name.
by INSOMAN1ATIC on Jan 24, 2012 5:38 PM MST up reply actions
Yeah
I don’t really understand the comparison. The only common factor here is this was their first season in the new offense.
"If Gortat pulls off a real Dream Shake in-game this year I will shave my head.
Mark my words." Piotr Szczesniak 12/12/11 2:12 PM
Cardinals, Suns, D-backs for life!
No...WHOA
I’m saying EVEN WARNER looked bad his first season in AZ. Not saying Kolb is Warner. The point of the comment was not KOLB KOLB KOLB KOLB, it was that it is too early to have any definitive answer as whether Kolb is the answer. We didn’t see enough of him and he did not get the prep time that even rookies had.
Like the Cardinals? Revenge of the Birds is where to go.
Like Arizona Sports in general? SB Nation Arizona is where you'll get it all.
Follow me on Twitter! @senorjessroot
I agree with this
We need to see Kolb after a real off-season with also having time in the offense.
"If Gortat pulls off a real Dream Shake in-game this year I will shave my head.
Mark my words." Piotr Szczesniak 12/12/11 2:12 PM
Cardinals, Suns, D-backs for life!
We probably won't,
see enough of him when he goes down in week 6, but believe it or not, even I know there is a MAJOR silver lining with Kolb.
Formerly known as Cardsfan928, If you wanna grab a quick game of madden, my screenname is also my Xbox name.
by INSOMAN1ATIC on Jan 24, 2012 6:24 PM MST up reply actions
Not going to say for sure Kolb isn't the answer
But I do know this team is a QB away from being a very, very good team. We need it patched up and secured for the next few years or so. Don’t waste the talent on our roster (especially defensively) with insufficient QB play. The other issues are OT, OLB, and a #2 WR.
.
"If Gortat pulls off a real Dream Shake in-game this year I will shave my head.
Mark my words." Piotr Szczesniak 12/12/11 2:12 PM
Cardinals, Suns, D-backs for life!
They get a B,
for finishing .500 with another QB carousel.
Formerly known as Cardsfan928, If you wanna grab a quick game of madden, my screenname is also my Xbox name.
Who gets a B?
The team? If so I would personally say it was a C because .500 is pretty average. I would say a B season would be a team with high expectations having a sub-par year but still making the playoffs. Just my opinion of course. An A would be a team who either does really well with high expectations, or a team who just had a great year and made the playoffs, regardless of expectations.
"If Gortat pulls off a real Dream Shake in-game this year I will shave my head.
Mark my words." Piotr Szczesniak 12/12/11 2:12 PM
Cardinals, Suns, D-backs for life!





















