Did The Arizona Cardinals Do The Right Thing In Blocking Interview With John McNulty?
Saturday Arizona Cardinals fans learned that the Tampa Bay Buccaneers wanted to interview wide receivers coach John McNulty for their offensive coordinator position, as he had worked with new head coach Greg Schiano while at Rutgers. They also learned that the Cardinals denied said interview request.
Now we don't know the exact reasons for it and that it has reportedly upset McNulty, who wants that position, but the Cardinals were well within their rights to block the interview. However, should they have?
Perhaps the team did not want to have to have a second position to fill on the coaching staff. Perhaps they see something in McNulty they want to keep around. Perhaps they simply wanted to do to a team what was done to them by the Pittsburgh Steelers just last year when they blocked Keith Butler from interviewing with the Cardinals for their defensive coordinator position.
I speculated that letting McNulty go could actually bolster the coaching staff. Todd Haley and another guy like Hue Jackson could be brought on.
There is a fine line the organization must toe when it comes to personnel. You want to have stability on a coaching staff and talent, but you want the coaches to feel like they are being supported in their goals of advancement. I don't know the answer with this situation. When a coach signs a contract, they should think about whether they want security or the ability to walk away when their shot comes for a promotion.
The question for you is to let us know whether or not the Cardinals should have blocked the interview. Is it worth disgruntling a guy on your staff and risk chemistry issues?
For the latest AZ sports, follow us on Twitter @SBNArizona and "Like" us on Facebook.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think it was alright of them because
It creates another void on our staff and I feel if your under contract honor it
keith butler's contract is up and is taking def. coor. poition with the colts.
take that steelers. i bet they’re mad :-)
by AlaskanCard on Jan 29, 2012 10:11 AM MST via mobile reply actions
So now that the Colts look like they'll have Butler at DC and Arians at OC are they now going to be known as Steelers South.
The Steelers West stuff is so old and tired so I think the Colts (excuse me Steelers South) deserve a turn.
"The point is, by my standards, I won fair and square."
-Bender
I guess that means,
The team that Cowher built is all coming to an end?
Formerly known as Cardsfan928, If you wanna grab a quick game of madden, my screenname is also my Xbox name.
by INSOMAN1ATIC on Jan 29, 2012 9:19 PM MST up reply actions
Maybe next season,
outside of Miller everyone is coming back aren’t they?
Formerly known as Cardsfan928, If you wanna grab a quick game of madden, my screenname is also my Xbox name.
This is everyday business in the NFL
Teams do it all the time. If you have a guy under contract and plan to promote him, sometimes you have to protect your own interests rather than just playing Mr. Nice Guy. The alternative is letting another team walk away with him and now you’re the team with the coaching vacancy and needing permission to talk to other teams, etc. Nice guys finish last. I’m sure Cardinals management knows a lot more about the overall dynamics of the situation than we do so I’m not going to judge them for it.
He's under contract
Plain and simple. I’m sure he’s a upset about it BUT I’m sure he’s wasn’t upset when he was awarded that contract he has with AZ. I too agree with the others that if we let him go it may be to many gaps to fill and hurting our continuity that a team in the upswing has right now.
by defense_dad on Jan 29, 2012 3:10 PM MST via iPhone app reply actions
Funny how nearly all the posts here support "yes"
But “no” keeps leading in the poll. Buccaneers fans?






















