Arizona Cardinals Free Agency: Should The Team Keep Alfonso Smith?
Another day in the free agency series, another lopsided vote. 96% of you voted that the Arizona Cardinals should definitely keep LaRod Stephens-Howling on the roster by tendering the restricted free agent an offer. His skills both in the return game and as an agile running back definitely make him a candidate to return.
The Cardinals also have another running back's contract to deal with this offseason. They hold the exclusive rights to Alfonso Smith, an undrafted free agent out of Kentucky in 2010. He not only carried the ball out of the backfield for Arizona, but he has been a productive member of the special teams over the past two seasons. So the question is: should the Cardinals keep him around?
Smith only carried the ball 30 times for 102 yards in 2011 for the Cardinals, scoring his lone touchdown in week seven against the vaunted Pittsburgh Steelers defense. His 3.4 yards per carry is certainly nothing to get excited over, but then again, it can be somewhat difficult to average much more behind the current offensive line of the Cardinals.
Not only was Smith a contributor in the run game, but he played a prominent role in the special teams phase of the game as well. He had three tackles and only missed one, according to Pro Football Focus. His ability to get downfield in a timely manner makes him a huge asset on both kickoffs and punts.
So is it worth it for the Cardinals to keep Smith on the roster? He only played on 10.7% of the snaps on offense and his production was limited, but it often takes more time on the field for a running back to get going. As stated previously, the Cards do own his exclusive rights and would be able to retain him at a relatively cheap price, so I say why not?
At the very least, Smith will provide an extra body during training camp while Ryan Williams continues to recover from his patella tendon injury. Chester Taylor will more than likely not be rejoining the team next season, so the Cardinals will need a 4th running back anyhow. Smith knows the system and he has excellent speed and good potential, so hopefully with some continued hard work, he can become a solid player for this organization.
What do you think? Should the Cardinals keep Alfonso Smith around? Vote in the poll and please leave your reasoning in the comments section below.
We invite you to follow Revenge of the Birds on Twitter at @revengeofbirds and like us on Facebook. Also, follow me on Twitter at @TylerNickelASU.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I voted yes even though I don't see him returning.
He’s a good back but he just hasn’t been given his fair chance. He carried the ball 30 times for 102 yards with 1 TD this year, that being the game at Seattle while Beanie Wells was out. He’s a good RB outside the tackles like LSH and not only that he’s a solid Special Teamer, seeing as he’s in nearly every big play that’s made in the return game. Keep him… we can go with a 4 RB committee.
What about "Maybe"?
Smith is certainly worth keeping but the RB position is not that settled for me. Williams needs to come back strong and as a threat, if not we need another alternative. In that case Williams drops to 3 and number 2 needs to be added.
No
We have Wells, Williams, and LSH. We don;t need him IMO.
"If Gortat pulls off a real Dream Shake in-game this year I will shave my head.
Mark my words." Piotr Szczesniak 12/12/11 2:12 PM
Cardinals, Suns, D-backs for life!
He is not eligible for the PS anymore
Active on the 53 man for too long
by Tyler Nickel on Feb 12, 2012 8:50 PM MST up reply actions
Yes
I like Wells, Williams, LSH, Smith
Last year we had Wells, Taylor, LSH, Smith, so we know the FO will carry 4 RB’s
MOAR SEVERINO!
@awalker138-I have joined the twitters
Yes as the 4th back
Arizona Cardinals/Chicago Bears fan
Phoenix Suns, Arizona Diamondbacks, Phoenix Coyotes, Arizona Rattlers fan
[I have always lived in Arizona, dad is from Chicago].
Leading the NFL in swagtangibles
Good, cheap, and young 4th string RB
and he has some in-game experience. Bring him back, and scratch off RB from your draft boards and FA lists
Follow me on Twitter at @AlexDavidson68
He will be back as the 4th RB.
Taylor will get the axe. Smith’s contributions will be mostly on special teams. He will only see spot duty at RB if and when the situation demands.
by hadrarius on Feb 13, 2012 9:34 AM MST via mobile reply actions
I wouldn't mind seeing them go in another direction.
Smith has a decent skill set and good speed, but I think he would be better suited in a zone-blocking scheme where he could be a one cut and go RB. Outside the tackles he’s almost as big a threat as LSH, but between them he sucked. But he does have special teams value so they could justify keeping him. I would like to see them draft or sign a big, durable, physical short-yardage type back that excels between the tackles, like a Mike Tolbert. Just somebody that may not be feature back guy, but someone you can count on to be healthy and that can pick up tough yards. We know for sure Wells can’t last a whole season carrying a big load by himself again, and we’re not sure how injury prone Williams is going to be. LSH has too much special teams value and too small a frame to give him a major role on offense. I would just rather see a better insurance plan than Smith. Although a short yardage back makes the most sense to me, there are a handful of RBs in the draft that I find intriguing like Terrance Ganaway, Tauren Poole, Antwon Bailey, Keola Antolin, Robert Turbin, and Michael Smith (who could end up a late round steal). The O-line ranked 7th in run blocking (Pro Footbal Focus) this season, the WRs here have to block to get on the field, and the offense has one of the better young FBs in Anthony Sherman. This team is clearly built to run and I would like to see the team commit a little more to the run and put together a better rotation at RB that can take advantage of the present situation.

by 






















