clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

NFL free agency: Who are the winners and losers? Arizona Cardinals not mentioned

New, comments

With most big-name free agents off the board, it's time to preemptively judge who's best positioned for 2014. Forget the Draft! We need judgment NOW!

In a world of instant judgement and analysis, we must naturally grade the free agency period and determine winners and losers.

In the latest Daily Win with Matt Ufford, he gives his take on five winners and five losers in free agency.

He does not mention the Arizona Cardinals, despite their success so far.

He does mention the Denver Broncos, the Tampa Bay Bucs, the Dolphins for signing Branden Albert and defensive backs for getting paid.

Denver has picked up some very good players for a lot of money. You can definitely be seen as sane for going with that. But the Cardinals picked up a franchise left tackle and have addressed almost every single team need before the draft. Why don't they get a mention?

That would be because who notices the Cardinals outside of Arizona?

It was notable to see that the Raiders are one of the losers, being that they lose Veldheer, signed Rodger Saffold, "a lesser player for more money" and then lost him because of his failed physical.

Who are your winners and losers? Should Arizona be on the list?